Tag apostles

Concentrate on the Calling (Acts 6:1-4)

¹ Now in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplying, there arose a complaint against the Hebrews by the Hellenists, because their widows were neglected in the daily distribution. ² Then the twelve summoned the multitude of the disciples and said, “It is not desirable that we should leave the word of God and serve tables. ³ Therefore, brethren, seek out from among you seven men of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business; ⁴ but we will give ourselves continually to prayer and to the ministry of the word.”

Acts 6:1 The new community has been characterized by unity and sharing (Acts 4:32). In the recent past people that owned land or houses sold them and brought the proceeds to be distributed according to needs (Acts 4:34-35). Out of this generosity the needs of all the people were met — until they weren’t. At some point it became obvious that the distribution stopped being fair. Greek-speaking Jews (Hellenists) noticed that their Greek-speaking widows were neglected in the daily distribution of alms. The Hellenist’s complaint against the Hebrews, a quiet grumbling that eventually erupted in open criticism, was that the Hebrews were only taking care of Hebrew widows; Hellenistic widows were overlooked.

The care of the widows is good. But when the care is not done carefully it can cause hard feelings, discontent, and even division. Although the number of disciples was multiplying not everyone was feeling good about how their fellowship was treating the Hellenistic widows. Can you imagine the complaint?

“Excuse me, Peter, John, and the other apostles. Sorry to bother you guys with this but the Hellenists or Greek-speaking Jews are upset because their widows are neglected by the Hebrews in the daily distribution of alms. That is, when the food pantry or money is given out, the Greek-speaking widows typically get less or are left out altogether.”

The Hellenists were Jews that had been “born outside the Land but had moved into the Land of Israel. These are the Diaspora Jews. Jews from the Dispersion who had migrated back into the Land of Israel” (Fruchtenbaum, 2020). They believed in Yahweh, had practiced Judaism, and had become followers of Jesus. However, owing to their long and multi-generational residence in other countries, they did not speak Hebrew. Does this matter to us today? Let’s talk ministry effectiveness. For those who would serve their subcultures well, it does. Serving your church well means being able to communicate effectively. This is not entirely based on your own ability to articulate the meaning of a passage or lead people in worship. It also means being able to listen well to people that we love when they are in difficult moments. In those moments, if their first language is not your first language, the ministry may be operating below its capacity.

The desire to speak one’s native tongue during times of high emotional is a deeply rooted psychological and cultural phenomenon. This behavior is often seen in multilingual individuals who, despite proficiency in other languages, revert to their first language when experiencing intense emotions such as fear, anger, grief, or joy. For those who would bring excellence to the service of people whose first language is something other than their own, without the ability to speak the language of the people you are serving, things are being missed. Consider diversifying your team. Prayerfully look at adding people to the team that speak the languages of the demographics you are serving. Why?

Psychological and Neurological Factors Favoring Diversity

• Emotional Resonance — The native language, often learned in early childhood, is intricately tied to an individual’s emotional development. Emotional experiences and expressions are encoded in this language. This means that the first langauge is the most natural medium for articulating deep-seated feelings (Pavlenko, 2005).
• Cognitive Load — Speaking a non-native language requires additional cognitive resources, as it involves not just language production but also the management of grammatical structures, vocabulary, and pronunciation. During emotional turmoil, cognitive load increases, and individuals may find it more challenging to maintain fluency in a second language. Reverting to the native language, which is processed more automatically and with less cognitive effort, becomes a natural response. Ministry Relevance: When trying to comfort or counsel someone who prefers to speak in another language, their ability to clearly communicate their perspective may be inhibited by cognitive load. Having someone who can talk with the person in their native language allows them to spend less energy in the mental work of translating their feelings into your tongue and more energy in the effort to be transparent and clear.
• Comfort and Identity — The native language is often closely linked to one’s identity and sense of self. In moments of vulnerability, people tend to seek comfort in familiar cultural symbols, including language. Speaking the native tongue provides a sense of security, continuity, and connection to one’s roots. This can be comforting during distressing times.

Sociolinguistic Perspectives

• Cultural Context — Language is a core component of culture, and expressing emotions in the native tongue allows individuals to tap into culturally specific ways of understanding and articulating feelings. For example, certain emotional expressions or concepts may not have direct translations in other languages, making the native language the most effective way to communicate these nuances.
• Social Bonds — Speaking the native language in times of emotional need can also be a way to strengthen social bonds with others who share the same language. It can signal a need for empathy and understanding from those within the same linguistic community, who are more likely to grasp the emotional subtleties being expressed.

Questions for Consideration

1. Can you or anyone in the leadership team of your ministry or church fellowship readily list the ethnic groups you serve?
2. How many groups are being served whose first-languages are not represented in the leadership team?

Acts 6:2 The twelve summoned the multitude of the disciples to disclose and direct. Trained by Jesus to lead they recognize the importance of ensuring the participation of the church laity in dealing with difficulty. First, they disclosed their assessment of the situation and how it related to their apostleship: It is not desirable that we should leave the word of God and serve tables. Notice that they did not speak against serving the widows. But they said they should not be the ones doing it. Some will see in their response a condescending attitude toward the needs of the poor. Some will read this passage and get the impression that the apostles believe themselves to be above serving widows. That is not the case. They have been trained to serve (Matthew 20:28; John 13:1-17), charged to serve (Luke 22:26; John 21:17; 1 Peter 5:3), and changed in order to serve effectively (John 14:26; 15:26). And they believe that serving the poor is an important part of church ministry (Galatians 2:10). In seeking to understand the response of the apostles we must prayerfully consider their calling. The apostles were to have a special foundation-laying ministry (Ephesians 2:20) of preaching, teaching, and penning the word. Each of the following passages sheds some light on their decision in this matter:

• Their Call to Preaching was the Main Plan (Mark 3:14) – ¹⁴ Then He appointed twelve, that they might be with Him and that He might send them out to preach. This passage makes it clear that from the beginning Jesus had a preaching ministry in mind. Although He did teach them how to serve others in various ways, preaching was foremost among the reasons they were selected and trained.
• Their Call to Preaching was Primary (Acts 5:20; Matthew 10:14) – The angel did not tell the apostles to return to the work of distributing aid to the widows; they were directed to return to the ministry of declaring and teaching the word of God.
• Working with the Word was The Ministry of the Spirit Among the Apostles (John 14:23-26; John 16:13) – The apostles were supposed to teach all things that Jesus commanded (Matthew 28:18-20). The Spirit of God needed to have their undivided attention. As the Helper was bringing to remembrance what Jesus taught them, they could not be distracted by the distribution of alms. Such work could be done by someone else.

Who wants to see the pilot of the airplane coming down the aisle asking if you would like cookies or peanuts? A lot of people can do that job. But flying the plane requires special training and our lives depend on it being done well. We want the pilot to remain focused on flying.

• The Call to Preaching was Personal (John 21:17) – Peter had pledged faithfulness but abandoned Jesus when he was faced with arrest and the promise of brutality. In a painful conversation with Peter the risen Lord both extended forgiveness and defined faithfulness. Jesus made it clear that the past failures were not important; He wanted Peter to go forward loving his Lord by feeding His sheep. And the love language of Jesus was not ambiguous: Feed His sheep, Peter! For Peter the priority of preaching was more than the common calling of Christ on their apostolic band; it was deeply personal to him.

It is with their calling in mind that they must say no to the request for their personal oversight and high participation in the distribution of alms to the poor. They say no in order that they would yes to what matters most – their calling. For the apostles, to personally prevent the problem that has been presented they would have had to take an enormous amount of time away from prayer and the ministry of the word. That would not be desirable; they were called and trained for a ministry of the word. As we consider the response of the apostles we are given a principle for our own day-to-day decisions about what we should and should not do. If we are going to render excellence to God and His people though our living, we do well to keep this in mind:

The Principle of High Quality Production — Excellence is never an accident. In order to effectively bring forth good fruit you must focus. There will be no casual completion of your calling. You must concentrate on your calling and cut out things that you are not called to do (1 Timothy 4:15). Being involved in many good things at the expense of your calling is not desirable to God.

Here is the question, friend: What can I do to become more fruitful in my calling? And here below are three things that will help you get answers and stay in His will.

• Get Clarity on Your Calling (Mark 3:14; Matthew 10:14; John 15:20; John 14:23-26; John 21:17)
• Regularly Review your Reasons (Psalm 1; Joshua 1:8) – Keep your plans for the year in view. Regularly retreat to review these plans and request from God insight into what needs to change. This helps with course correction when we begin to drift.
• Delegate Some Duties (Exodus 18:1-27) – Failure to delegate is the undoing of many. For those of us who want the ministry to grow we must make it a priority to spend time (1) mentoring the next generation, (2) involving other gifted people in the work we do, and (3) casting vision for what will happen with real focus.

Before I was blessed with an opportunity to serve as a pastor at Three Rivers Community Church in Martindale I was a volunteer with a few ministries in San Antonio, Texas. I remember like it was yesterday talking with a friend in the hotel lobby during a break at a winter conference. I was serving as a speaker along with James Mendoza. (Pastor Mendoza is an outstanding leader and teacher at Vista Community Church in San Antonio, Texas.) While at the conference a friend and ministry staff member with the ministry I volunteered with asked if I was going to sign up for another year. As much as I enjoyed serving as a speaker for their conference and for the campuses served by that ministry, I was certain that I would not be going much further with them. Why? Because I was not leading.

And in my home church, although I was asked to serve as a leader of a good ministry in that fellowship, I was certain that I would not be staying. Why? Because I was not teaching. During that same period of time I was also asked if I would lead media ministries for two different organizations. I gave each of them a no. Why? Because if I had accepted those positions I would not be focused in the areas that God has equipped and called me: leading and teaching. Friend, you must stay with what God had called you to do. It is not desirable that you would leave your calling to serve in other capacities. Be undistracted! Some will regard your steadfast decision to be undistracted as an indicator of arrogance. That may be true; you may be arrogant. But don’t be ignorant of the truth about your calling – you need to concentrate on it. Saying no to others is about saying yes to God even more. Or, as is the case with the apostles, your “no” is the outworking of a clarity and confidence about the calling of Christ on your life. Saying “yes” to things that you are not called to do means saying “no” to being truly devoted to your calling.

The Principle of Equal and Opposite Answers — When we are asked to do something, we have to realize that saying yes will always mean saying no to something or someone else.

It is not arrogance or a lack of a servant’s heart that will lead you to turn down an “opportunity” when it means being less available for what God is asking of you.

Questions for Consideration

1. Are you being asked to serve in ways that are within your skillset but outside your calling? Jesus had the skills or ability to do a lot of things. But he limited Himself to His father’s business.
2. Itemize your duties and things you have agreed to do. Look over the list and identify which items are related to what you are called by God to do. Take a moment to put that list on a separate sheet of paper or in an electronic document. Ask some other godly people if they agree. Let the first person you ask be Jesus. And give Him time to reply. Do not immediately rush off to ask others.

References

Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge University Press.

Notes

In the featured image of this post I am seen with Rev. Patrick (Forrest Hills Presbyterian Church), Christina (administrative assistant), and Joshua (UTSA student and way cool partner in ministry). We were fellowshipping a bit.

The apostles keep getting arrested. First it was just Peter and John (Acts 4:1-3). Now it is all of them (Acts 5:17-18). That is, in our passage the high priest came with a group and arrested all of the apostles. Soon after they were released by an angel (Acts 5:19-20). Today, they are being arrested again. But it is different. Notice the contrast between the arrest of yesterday (Acts 5:17-18) and today (Acts 5:26).

• Yesterday it was a “hands-on” approach to getting the apostles. The arrest literally involved a throwing on of hands (ἐπέβαλον τὰς χεῖρας ἐπὶ τοὺς ἀποστόλους) by the captain of the temple and his officers. To understand what is meant by “laid their hands on the apostles” it helps to see that the word being translated laid (ἐπέβαλον) is found in other places (Acts 4:3; 21:27). Anyone who becomes acquainted with the other passages where ἐπέβαλον is used, can see that the arrest of the apostles was violent.
• Today, however, the captain went with the officers and brought the apostles without violence (Acts 5:26). The apostles have most certainly reported their imprisonment, angelic visitation, and command to “speak to the people all the words of this life” (Acts 5:20). With that in mind, the captain’s attempt to arrest the apostles must be seen as evil. It is really an attempt to prevent (1) a ministry that has been helping hurting people and (2) the bringing of the message of eternal life through faith in Jesus Christ. The jealousy (indignation) of the high priest was the motivation behind the arrest. In the power of the Holy Spirit the Galileans are drawing the people away from the Sadducees to the Savior.

But, what changed? That is, why is this second attempt to get the apostles without violence. The text makes it clear: the captain and the officers are afraid.

Then the captain went with the officers and brought them without violence, for they feared the people, lest they should be stoned. (Acts 5:26)

It is obvious that the people now side with the apostles and are willing to use their greater numbers and the stones in the immediate vicinity to stop the arrest. (We must also see that the foolishness of Sadducee teachings is now on full display. Sadducees do not believe in angels (Acts 23:8). However, according to the apostles, an angel let them out of prison. Either the prison is truly dysfunctional and the apostles are lying or there is growing evidence that angels are real.) The religious leaders want to shut down an effective ministry and the people are now standing in the way. If the apostles are going to be arrested, they are going to have to be willing to go on their terms.

They are unstoppable! No weapon formed against them will prosper (Isaiah 54:17).

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

Continuity of Miraculous Power (Acts 5:12a)

With the conjunction and of and through the apostles hands (δὲ τῶν χειρῶν τῶν ἀποστόλων) of Acts 5:12, the material following the tragedy of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11) is tied to the record of what follows (Acts 5:12-16). In effect, using the coordinating conjunction, Luke tells the reader to look at Acts 5:12-16 in light of what has just happened and to see it as a continuation of the Spirit’s work. Notice the continuity.

Do not miss the fact that the power of the apostle’s anointing continued to be at work with many signs and wonders being done among the people. Do not miss the significance of their continued ability to do miracles.

The same Spirit that was at work in the separation of the liars is still at work in the support of the leaders.

Their credentials as approved men of God and authorities to whom the people must listen were in the many signs and wonders (John 10:38; 14:11). If you were struggling with what had happened, your confidence in the apostles would be restored daily by their godly character and their great ongoing power and willingness to help others free of charge. Through the continuity of miracles through the apostles, Christ was telling the church that He continued to be at work both in and through the apostles and that He approved of the outcome with Ananias and Sapphira.

Continuity of Unified Fellowship (Acts 5:12b)

See their cohesion and oneness; the people continued to be unified as a fellowship. It says that they were all with one accord in Solomon’s Porch. In light of verse 13 the all is certainly a reference to the known congregation prior to the event of Acts 5:1-11. That same group of people, minus two, is still meeting in Solomon’s Portico or colonnade.

Figure 1: Solomon’s Porch Concept Art – Covered area with columns

Thousands of people have come to faith since Pentecost; the outpouring of the Spirit was in a room where a 120 people could meet. There are too many people to meet in the upper room mentioned in Acts 2. The apostles have taken up the practice of Jesus (John 10:23); they go to an open place in the temple to meet with the people in a ministry of teaching and miracles.

Unity remained and the custom of coming together in the temple to hear the word continued. When the Lord cleanses His community, the problem is removed, and the people continue in unity. If a church community disintegrates on account of disobedience, it may be an indicator that the Lord is removing the lampstand (Matthew 5:13-16; Revelation 2:5) of that fellowship. Unity is important and after a tragic event it must be guarded and promoted. Why is unity important?

Unity is an indispensable attribute of fellowships that will be effective as witnesses in their communities (Acts 1:8; John 13:35; 17:21) and in the work for which we were saved (Ephesians 2:10; 4:15-16 Galatians 6:2). The ongoing unity made the Jerusalem fellowship fit for witnessing to the world and the work of building up one another. Prince among preachers, Charles Spurgeon (June 19, 1834 – January 31, 1892), puts the importance of unity in perspective:

Satan always hates Christian fellowship; it is his policy to keep Christians apart. Anything which can divide saints from one another he delights in. He attaches far more importance to godly fellowship than we do. Since union is strength, he does his best to promote separation. (Spurgeon, 1868).

The events of Acts 5:1-11 (chastening or church discipline) and Acts 5:12-16 (continued power and unity) are a lesson for the modern church. We are prone to permit and tacitly promote evil when we do not take an active stand against it in our fellowships. Why? We are fearful that we will lose membership, lose financial stability, and lose our ability to reach the surrounding community. But the truth is that the compromise of not confronting and cutting out willful sinning will grieve the Spirit and hence undermine out witness. We cannot bear fruit if we do not abide in His word. Acts 5:1-16 is telling our churches to not believe the lie of losing the church if we deal with sin. The truth is that we will lose our churches if we don’t deal with willful disobedience.

Evaluate and Embrace or Eliminate — People and things that underscore the importance of unity and undertake the ongoing challenge to protect and promote Christ-centered unity in our churches are of the Spirit and missional in nature. People and things that persistently undermine church unity are demonic and are used by the devil in his dogged determination to destroy men and the mission given the local church. Take inventory church. Evaluate and embrace everything that is found to be in the first category. Eliminate with extreme prejudice everything that falls into the second and everyone that, when confronted, will not repent.

In this regard I am especially qualified to say something. My journey with Jesus has included highs in ministry and times of dealing with disobedience in ways that have been painful, public, and yet absolutely necessary for the health of the fellowship… and my own walk with God. Now I am thankful. In the handling of sin in our fellowships we cannot forget the importance of grace, gentleness, and the goal of restoration. Let nothing be done toward the sinning brother or sister that does not take into account God’s grace toward us in Christ (Ephesians 4:32); recipients of grace must not forget their own history of rebellion and the great grace that brought about their repentance. Gentleness, if possible, should be shown toward those who have failed. Only when the sinning persons demonstrates an unwillingness to repent should fellowship be shut off and interactions be limited to what is absolutely necessary. Finally, we should aim for restoration. That means, although a period of separation or being sidelined is in order, we want to see our brothers and sisters back in fellowship and using their gifts for the glory of God and the good of others. Peter failed. After a time he was restored. The brother in Corinth failed. He needed to be put out for a time. But not permanently. He needed to be restored. Restoration should become part of our stories; otherwise our churches become characterized by the false notion that the members have not messed up and that failure is unforgivable and the end of fellowship — an anti-gospel of sorts.

Questions for Consideration

1. Is the fear of repercussions preventing your fellowship from confronting sin issues in the congregation?
2. Does the church have a history of helping a fallen brother or sister get back up?
3. What message does it send to the surrounding community if the person who fails is sent away permanently?

References

Spurgeon, Charles H. (1868). Lectures to My Students. Marshall, Morgan & Scott.

In the Aftermath of Chastening (Acts 5:12-16)

¹² And through the hands of the apostles many signs and wonders were done among the people. And they were all with one accord in Solomon’s Porch. ¹³ Yet none of the rest dared join them, but the people esteemed them highly. ¹⁴ And believers were increasingly added to the Lord, multitudes of both men and women, ¹⁵ so that they brought the sick out into the streets and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them. ¹⁶ Also a multitude gathered from the surrounding cities to Jerusalem, bringing sick people and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed.

Introduction

What does a congregation do after events like the church discipline displayed with Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11)? You could stop everything and get a consultant / counselor to come in and help everyone deal with the grief and fear that comes with (1) lying to the Spirit and (2) the Spirit’s abrupt removal of the liars. You could lose momentum and eventually have to shut things down. (In the denominations that I have served in such a response would involve contacting the district because the assets of the church actually belong to the denomination.) If you were in the Ananias camp you could convene a clandestine committee to replace Peter. (In light of most recent events, Peter is probably going to know. And may the Lord have mercy on you when you come to church.) Here is what the passage promotes:

1) Regard the church community and its individual members as sacred; do not bring into the bride of Christ worldly ways of getting ahead.

2) Acknowledge the anointing and authority of those appointed to lead. In the case of the apostles, their position and power in God’s work makes lying to them tantamount to lying to the Holy Spirit.

But what does a fellowship do after events like those recorded in Acts 5:1-11? In the writing of Luke we see that some things continue without change and one thing does not remain the same.

Questions for Consideration

1. Do you interact with your local congregation as a sacred community or something common?

2. While our local church leaders are not supernaturally able to discern the truth about things on their own, the Spirit can give them insights into things that would not otherwise be known. In your work with your leadership and other Christians are you mindful of the Spirit’s presence?