To the Church in Sardis (Revelation 3:1-6)

3:1 “And to the angel of the church in Sardis write,

‘These things says He who has the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars: “I know your works, that you have a name that you are alive, but you are dead. 2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die, for I have not found your works perfect before God. 3 Remember therefore how you have received and heard; hold fast and repent. Therefore if you will not watch, I will come upon you as a thief, and you will not know what hour I will come upon you. 4 You have a few names even in Sardis who have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with Me in white, for they are worthy. 5 He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels.

6 “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.” ’ (Revelation 3:1-6, NKJV)

Introduction

In the messages to the churches Jesus speaks words that are fitting for the situation faced by each fellowship. In each address the First and Last (Revelation 1:17) provides an assessment of the recipient church’s work as a lampstand (Revelation 1:20). Some churches are commended for the courage to let their light shine in the midst of growing hostilities toward Christ-following. Other churches are criticized for their cowardly conformity to the spiritual and sexual immorality of the people around them.

Each communication contains material that is specific to the church being addressed, but it also contains a general word to anyone reading the prophecy (Revelation 1:3). The general word is truth that transcends the particulars of Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamos, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, or Laodicea. It is for anyone and everyone who desires to live effectively in the service of Jesus.

In this general word, the Spirit of Jesus turns from the announcement to the individual church and appeals to all who will hear. The formula that introduces this broader call to consider and apply what was said is: “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches” (Revelation 2:7, 11, 17, 29; 3:6, 13, 22). In Revelation 3:1–6, the reader of the larger work is taken to the fifth of the seven churches — the church in Sardis (Revelation 1:11; 3:1).

The message to the church in Sardis may be broadly characterized as containing a revelation of the quality of their work as a lampstand (Revelation 3:1), a resuscitation through an abrupt call (Revelation 3:2), requirements for remediating stated problems (Revelation 3:3), encouragement for a remnant of faithful followers (Revelation 3:4), an uplifting message about the record of the faithful and the eventual confession of Christ (Revelation 3:5), and the relevance of this message for a readership that is not from Sardis (Revelation 3:6).

The Revealing (Revelation 3:1)

Patmos and the Seven Churches

Figure 1: Patmos and the Seven Churches. In a route that starts with Ephesus, the church at Sardis is the fifth of seven.

The reference to the sevenfold Spirit of God in Revelation 3:1 is not isolated. The same expression has already appeared in the opening of the prophecy, where grace and peace are said to come from “the seven Spirits who are before His throne” (Revelation 1:4). It appears again in the vision of the Lamb, who has “seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent out into all the earth” (Revelation 5:6). The language is therefore not a new idea introduced in the message to Sardis, but a deliberate reminder of the fullness of the Spirit associated with the reign and work of Christ.

For readers familiar with the Old Testament, this points vigorously to Isaiah’s prophecy concerning the anointed Branch from the line of Jesse: “The Spirit of the LORD shall rest upon Him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD” (Isaiah 11:2). The sevenfold description in Isaiah is the basis for the mention of the Spirit in this symbolic fullness. This sevenfold Spirit is the Spirit of Christ. So then, the Christ who speaks to Sardis has power, perception, wisdom, counsel, and authority. He possesses the fullness of the Spirit of God seen in his earthly ministry (Luke 4:14-21; Acts 10:38). He is the King who sees all, understand all, and ultimately is in control of all.

Stars are luminaries in highly visible positions. In Scripture they can function figuratively as signs or representatives that point beyond themselves to Christ. E.g., at the birth of Christ, the magi saw “His star” in the East and came to worship Him (Matthew 2:2). Later, the same star went before them “till it came and stood over where the young Child was” (Matthew 2:9–10). In a similar witness-bearing role, John the Baptist is described not as the Light itself, but as one sent to bear witness to the Light, so that others might believe through him (John 1:6–8). Jesus later described John as “the burning and shining lamp,” adding that the people “were willing for a time to rejoice in his light” (John 5:35).

In Revelation, the “stars” are specifically identified as the angels or messengers of the churches (Revelation 1:16, 20). Therefore, when Christ introduces Himself to Sardis as the One who has the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars (Revelation 3:1), the image speaks of His authority over those appointed to serve as visible witnesses within the churches. These messengers are not the light themselves; their purpose is to point the church to Christ, the true Lord of the lampstands. Now the Lord of the lampstands is about to provide an assessment of their work as a lampstand.

Although they look healthy, Jesus says they are dead.


Figure 2: Although the church in Sardis looks healthy, Jesus says it is dead. They look festive but they have already flatlined.

The church in Sardis had a reputation or a nameyou are alive. But the one who has eyes like a flame of fire (Daniel 10:6; Revelation 2:18) and who tests the minds and hearts sees things differently (Jeremiah 17:9-10; 1 Samuel 16:7). Jesus is not concerned with reputations; He sees the more substantial matter of the contemplations of the heart, resulting character, and outworking conduct. Jesus says that the truth is that you are dead (Revelation 3:1). This is a reveal that would have surprised the recipients and the surrounding churches. And yet, considering the history of Sardis, it is not a surprised that they are caught off guard. Leon Morris says,

The city’s easy wealth seems to have made for slackness. It was captured by Cyrus the Persian (549 BC) and by Antiochus (218 BC), both times because of its slackness. The city was built on a hill so steep that its defences seemed impregnable. On both occasions enemy troops scaled the precipice by night and found that the overconfident Sardians had set no guard. (Morris, 1987, Vol. 20, p. 78)

Sardis is situated high on a hilltop. This has repeatedly led to inaccurate feelings of security and a lack of watchfulness. There is no mention of persecution for this church. Why is that? Because they are not being persecuted. They have been assimilated; they are not witnesses and, although they have the trappings of a lively church, with regard to the matter of their witness, they are dead.

The Resuscitation (Revelation 3:2)

The word of God calls Sardis out of its dead slumber.


The word of God calls Sardis out of its dead slumber.

Jesus resuscitates the church. His word is enough to bring about a good stirring in the people in the Sardis fellowship who needed the jolt. Wake up, church at Sardis! (cf. Romans 13:11; 1 Corinthians 16:13) The Be watchful is a present active participle; since particles are commentary on verbs we should view this as saying be watchful in an ongoing fashion for another activity. This must have felt to some like the paddles they use to get a heart restarted on someone who thought they were alive. It would have arrived to their ears with a “peculiar force to the church in a city which had twice been captured owing to its failure to watch. Lack of spiritual vigilance may likewise be costly (Morris, 1987, Vol. 20, p. 78-79). But what is the spiritual activity to which being watchful is attached?

Their fellowship is not fully necrotic; there remains some things in the church need to be strengthened. Jesus says to strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die. The verb translated strengthen (στήρισον) has the idea of causing something to be firmly established, to be built up, and to be confirmed (Lk 22:32; Ac 18:23; Ro 16:25). The things that needed to be strengthened are not called out; evidently, for a watchful person it would be obvious. Be watchful, church at Sardis, as you build up, as you bolster, and as you establish what is left of the good works left uncompleted. But Jesus will not leave it there. In case they still do not know what to do, He takes it a step further.

The Requirements: Remember and Repent (Revelation 3:3)

In the FBI’s 2019 offense-analysis table, residential daytime burglaries outnumbered residential nighttime burglaries: 290,909 during the day versus 195,884 at night, with 89,814 classified as unknown.


In the FBI’s 2019 offense-analysis table, residential daytime burglaries outnumbered residential nighttime burglaries: 290,909 during the day versus 195,884 at night, with 89,814 classified as unknown.

Go back to the basics, church. Remember or recall the manner in which you received the gospel. Someone shared it with you. You are believers today because believers declared to you the word of truth or gospel of your salvation (Ephesians 1:13). Remember how you heard or kept that word; you were obedient to that word and began to both be a light and to change your ways. Stay with that! Keep receiving the gospel and keep changing your ways. You have wandered away. Wander back! Repent! Morris puts it this way: “Obey (better ‘keep’, as RSV) is present imperative and enjoins a continuing activity, while repent (aorist) is urgent.” (Morris, 1987, Vol. 20, p. 79)

If the church does not watch or look out for places where it is becoming less than what Christ wants, the same Christ will come to it like a thief. This, for their time and culture, is a proverbial expression for unexpected visitation (Matt. 24:43; 1 Thess. 5:2; 2 Pet. 3:10). In case they were not getting it, Jesus goes on to say that He will not let them know when that visit will take place; he is coming like a thief and thieves don’t do not try to work with you to find a time that suites your calendar.

Pattern What the Data Suggests Summary
Daytime is common FBI data shows more residential burglaries during the day than at night in the cited U.S. table. (Federal Bureau of Investigation) “A thief does not always come in the dark; he comes when vigilance is low.”
Nighttime still matters Nighttime residential burglaries are still substantial, even though fewer than daytime incidents in the FBI table. (Federal Bureau of Investigation) “The issue is not the clock; it is the surprise.”
Weekdays are significant A U.K. College of Policing summary, drawing from ONS data, reports about 70% of domestic burglaries on weekdays and 30% on weekends; it also reports 40% from 6 a.m.–6 p.m. and 60% from 6 p.m.–6 a.m. (College of Policing) “Thieves study routines. Judgment catches the careless in their routine.”
Precise timing is hard to know Temporal crime research notes that residential burglary timing is often difficult to estimate precisely because victims may only know a time window, not the exact hour. (MDPI) “The victim often does not know the hour — which is exactly Jesus’ point.”
Day and night risks differ Criminological research distinguishes daytime and nighttime burglary patterns and argues that prevention frameworks differ by time period. (Twente Research Info) “The thief adapts to the condition of the house.”

This unexpected visit is not a reference to the second coming. How do we know that? The second coming will take place whether the Sardians are watchful or not; it is not conditional. So what is this visit? Christ comes in many ways and this is clearly a limited coming in judgment on unrepentant sinners. (Morris, 1987, Vol. 20, p. 79)

The Remnant (Revelation 3:4)

Beale’s statement accords with the idea of not being ashamed of Christ and the fact that he will not be ashamed of them (Revelation 3:5).

As already mentioned in regard to the letters to Pergamum and Thyatira, these Christians were probably succumbing to the temptation not only of maintaining a low profile as Christians in such contexts, but also of paying token acknowledgment to the pagan gods (whether to Caesar or the patron gods of the guilds). As also in the other churches, the motive for this was probably fear of persecution, especially economic ostracism. (Beale, 1999, p. 276)

The likeness of the noncompromisers to Jesus is intensified, since, as with him, their worthiness is not only a prior state but is included in the resulting condition of their overcoming. The worthiness of Jesus in 5:9 is a result of his overcoming (νικάω, 5:5). The same connection may be implicit in 3:4b–5a, where “they are worthy” (ἄξιοί εἰσιν) is directly followed by “the one who overcomes” (ὁ νικῶν). The acknowledgment of the saints’ worthiness anticipates the allusion to Matt. 10:32 at the end of 3:5. In that Synoptic context “worthy” (ἄξιος) is repeated three times to indicate the final reward for those who remain faithful to acknowledging Jesus despite persecution (see Matt. 10:33–39, and cf. “reward” in 10:41–42). Likewise, the main qualification for consummate worthiness here is a faith that testifies openly to Jesus. (Beale, 1999, p. 277)

That v 4b concerns a reward because of perseverance through suffering is further evident from 7:14, which refers to “the ones coming out of the great tribulation” and to those who “have washed their robes” (ἔπλυναν τὰς στολὰς αὐτῶν) and “made them white in the blood of the lamb” (ἐλεύκαναν αὐτὰς ἐν τῷ αἵματι τοῦ ἀρνίου). The parallel with 7:14 is confirmed further by περιπατήσουσιν μετʼ ἐμοῦ ἐν λευκοῖς … περιβαλεῖται ἐν ἱματίοις λευκοῖς in 3:4b–5a (“they will walk with me in white … he will be clothed in white robes”), wording that is developed in 7:9, 13, which both read περιβεβλημένους στολὰς λευκάς (“having been clothed in white robes”; cf. 3:18a). (Beale, 1999, p. 277)

Like the churches at Pergamum and Thyatira this one has a mixed membership. But in those the faulty members are a minority. At Sardis they predominate. Only ‘a few people’ have not ‘soiled their clothes’. (Morris, 1987, Vol. 20, p. 78)

The Record (Revelation 3:5)

The statement that their names will not be erased from the book of life presents a problem to some. But a person who is truly born again remains regenerate, as John said elsewhere (John 5:24; 6:35–37, 39; 10:28–29). While this passage may imply that a name could be erased from the book of life, actually it only gives a positive affirmation that their names will not be erased (cf. Walvoord, Revelation. pp. 82, 338). This is one of the most debated verses in Revelation because it sits at the intersection of two biblical themes:

  1. The certainty of God’s saving work (e.g., John 10:27–29; Romans 8:29–39; Philippians 1:6).
  2. The necessity of perseverance (e.g., Matthew 24:13; Hebrews 3:14; Revelation 2–3).

The question is whether Revelation 3:5 teaches that a genuinely saved person can lose salvation or whether Christ is making a positive promise of assurance.

After weighing the grammar, the context of Revelation, and the theology of the New Testament, I believe Revelation 3:5 is best understood as a promise of assurance rather than a warning that true believers can lose salvation. It is a promise to the overcomer, not a description of someone whose salvation has been revoked. The emphasis of the verse is positive, not negativ. The verse reads:

“He who overcomes… I will never blot out his name from the Book of Life…”

The Greek is especially emphatic:

οὐ μὴ ἐξαλείψω (ou mē exaleipsō)

The construction οὐ μή is one of the strongest ways Greek expresses denial. It could legitimately be translated:

“I will certainly never erase his name.”

Notice what Jesus does not say. He does not say:

“Some names will be erased.”

Instead He says:

“The conqueror’s name will never be erased.”

That is the emphasis. Further, the promise parallels the other promises in verse 5.

Promise Meaning
White garments Acceptance and purity
Never blot out the name Security
Confess the believer before the Father Public acknowledgment

Each is positive. It would be unusual if the middle promise suddenly became a veiled threat while the other two are straightforward assurances. The context of Sardis supports assurance. The church at Sardis had three standout characteristics: (1) a reputation for life, (2) but was spiritually dead, and (3) a faithful remnant (Rev. 3:4). Jesus distinguishes between:

  • those merely appearing alive
  • those who genuinely overcome

The overcomers are not earning salvation. Throughout Revelation, overcoming characterizes genuine believers (cf. 1 John 5:4–5).

Revelation itself explains who is in the Book of Life

  • Revelation 13:8 – Those whose names are written in the Book of Life do not worship the Beast.
  • Revelation 17:8 – Those whose names were written from the foundation of the world do not follow the Beast.

Notice the direction of logic. John does not say: They persevered, therefore their names stayed. Instead: Their names were written, therefore they persevered. This is a very important theological observation.

Consider with me for a moment the ancient civic atmosphere; it helps explain the promise. Most commentators point out that Sardis maintained citizen registers. When someone died—or occasionally lost citizenship—their name could be removed from the city’s roll. Jesus appears to use that familiar civic image. The point becomes:

“Earthly cities may erase your name. I never will.”

That fits beautifully with the church’s situation.

But you will say, “What about Moses asking to be blotted out?” In fact, you will answer me saying, “Several Old Testament passages mention blotting out.” This is true. Let us consider them:

Passage What it clearly proves What it does not clearly prove
Exodus 32:32–33 God has a “book”; blotting out is judgment against sinners after covenant rebellion. That Moses believed a regenerate person could lose eternal salvation.
Psalm 69:28 “Book of the living” language is tied to the righteous and the wicked. That David is teaching a doctrine of losing salvation.

These Old Testament texts provide the imagery of erasure from God’s book; they do not, by themselves, prove that Revelation 3:5 teaches the loss of eternal salvation. Also, it must not be overlooked that they were given under a different covenant – not of grace but of law. Revelation 3:5 must be read in its own context (eschatological) and covenant (grace); seen in this setting, Christ gives the overcomer a promise of security: “I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life.”

Those who believe salvation may be forfeited argue:

  • Jesus would not mention blotting out unless it were possible.
  • Warnings throughout Hebrews and Revelation are genuine.
  • “He who overcomes” implies that some believers fail to overcome.

This is a respectable interpretation and has been defended by Arminian scholars such as Grant R. Osborne and Robert H. Mounce. Both men generally understand Revelation’s warnings as real conditions for final salvation. However, even these scholars recognize that Revelation’s emphasis is perseverance rather than speculation about losing salvation.

Several observations, for me, tip the scales in favor of assurance.

Reason Explanation
The Grammar The verse is framed as an emphatic promise. It does not say, “I may erase.” Rather, it says, “I certainly never will.”
Revelation’s Doctrine of Election Revelation 13:8 and 17:8 describe those written in the Book of Life as preserved from apostasy. That makes the Book of Life the explanation for perseverance—not the reward for it.
Jesus’ Gospel Language Jesus repeatedly promises security (John 6:37–40; 10:27–29). No one can snatch Christ’s sheep from His hand. Revelation 3:5 harmonizes naturally with those promises.
The Literary Purpose Every promise to the seven churches is designed to encourage faithful believers. The emphasis is:

“Remain faithful because Christ keeps His own.”

rather than

“Remain faithful or I might erase you.”

There is also an important pastoral distinction. The New Testament consistently teaches (1) professing believers may fall away and (2) true believers persevere because God preserves them. From the human perspective, we are called to overcome. From God’s perspective, those written in the Book of Life do overcome. Those two truths are held together throughout the New Testament.

The phrase “I will never blot out his name” is best read as an emphatic promise of eternal security to genuine believers rather than evidence that salvation may be lost. The grammar is strongly affirmative, the immediate context emphasizes encouragement, and Revelation later teaches that those whose names are written in the Book of Life are preserved from ultimate apostasy. This reading also fits comfortably with Christ’s promises in John 10 and the broader New Testament doctrine of God’s preserving grace. Nevertheless, the verse still functions as a serious call to perseverance, because the New Testament never separates God’s preserving work from the believer’s continuing faith. Christ does not say, “I might blot out your name.” He says, “I will confess your name.” The final chord struck in this message to the needy church of Sardis is one of hope and encouragement not a veiled threat.

The Relevance (Revelation 3:6) – Seven Takeaways Toward Better Fellowship with Jesus

Takeaway Personal question Practice for the week
1. Refuse to live on reputation. “Am I known as alive, but spiritually coasting?” Ask God to show you where your public image is stronger than your private obedience.
2. Wake up spiritually. “Where have I become careless, dull, or sleepy toward the Lord?” Begin each morning with this prayer: “Lord, make me watchful today.”
3. Strengthen what remains. “What is still alive in me that needs attention before it dies?” Identify one neglected spiritual practice — prayer, Scripture, worship, service, confession — and rebuild it.
4. Remember how you received the gospel. “Have I drifted from the simplicity and seriousness of what I first received?” Spend time rehearsing the gospel: what Christ saved you from, what He saved you for, and what He is calling you to now.
5. Hold fast, not loosely. “What truth have I begun treating as optional?” Choose one command of Christ you already know and deliberately obey it this week.
6. Repent urgently. “What has God already confronted that I keep delaying?” Name the sin plainly before God and take one concrete step away from it today. Not vague regret — actual turning.
7. Don’t be harmless because you are spiritually dead. “Would the world even notice if I stopped following Jesus?” Look for one visible way to identify with Christ this week — in speech, ethics, generosity, witness, or refusal to compromise.
8. Refuse low-profile Christianity when faithfulness is required. “Am I hiding my allegiance to Jesus to avoid discomfort or cost?” In one setting where you tend to stay silent, speak or act in a way that makes loyalty to Christ clear.
9. Keep your garments clean. “What am I allowing to soil my walk with Christ?” Review entertainment, relationships, business habits, online conduct, and speech. Remove one defiling influence.
10. Find encouragement in the remnant. “Who else is trying to walk faithfully?” Connect with one faithful believer for prayer, encouragement, or accountability. Sardis had “a few”; find your few.
11. Live before God, not applause. “Are my works complete before people but unfinished before God?” Do one hidden act of obedience this week that no one else needs to see.
12. Let Christ’s warning sober you, not crush you. “Where is Jesus mercifully warning me before judgment comes?” Treat conviction as grace. Write down what the Spirit is pressing on you, then respond before the feeling fades.
13. Walk toward the promise, not merely away from sin. “Do I see holiness only as restriction, or as walking with Christ?” Meditate on the promise: “They shall walk with Me in white.” Let the goal be fellowship with Jesus, not merely moral cleanup.
14. Remember that Jesus knows the truth. “What does Jesus know about me that my reputation hides?” Pray Psalm 139:23–24 and invite the Lord to search the difference between appearance and actual.
15. Leave listening, not merely having heard. “Did I hear what the Spirit says, or only attend another service?” Before leaving the gathering, write one sentence: “Because of Revelation 3:1–6, I will ______ this week.”

References

Beale, G. K. (1999). The book of Revelation: a commentary on the Greek text (p. 260). W.B. Eerdmans; Paternoster Press.

Boldt, M., Borg, A., Svensson, M., & Lavesson, N. (2016). Evaluating temporal analysis methods using residential burglary data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(9), 148.

College of Policing. (2022). The nature of neighbourhood crime.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2020). Crime in the United States, 2019: Burglary. U.S. Department of Justice.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2020). Crime in the United States, 2019: Table 23—Offense analysis, number and percent change, 2018–2019. U.S. Department of Justice.

Montoya, L., Junger, M., & Ongena, Y. (2016). The relation between residential property and its surroundings and day- and night-time residential burglary. Environment and Behavior, 48(4), 515–549.

Morris, L. (1987). Revelation: an introduction and commentary. InterVarsity Press.

Walvoord, J. F. (1985). Revelation. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures. Victor Books.

Behold vs Indeed in Revelation 2:22

20Nevertheless I have a few things against you, because you allow that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, to teach and seduce My servants to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols. 21And I gave her time to repent of her sexual immorality, and she did not repent. 22Indeed I will cast her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds.

Upon reading this passage in the NKJV I wondered whether the word underlying the Indeed of 2:22 was actually ἰδοὺ. Upon checking the Nestle-Aland United Bible Societies version, my suspicions were confirmed:

22ἰδοὺ βάλλω αὐτὴν εἰς κλίνην καὶ τοὺς μοιχεύοντας μετ̓ αὐτῆς εἰς θλῖψιν μεγάλην, ἐὰν μὴ μετανοήσωσιν ἐκ τῶν ἔργων αὐτῆς,

The rendering in the NKJV makes the statement of Jesus an interjection. However, if it had been translated behold it would have been an imperative and a summons to watch what He was going to do if the wrongdoers did not repent. (ESV, KJV, and NASB have behold, The NET Bible has Look!) It may seem like a small matter. However, without the imperative it is not a call to action or a command that alters the course of that church or the modern reader. Jesus calls me to behold what He will do if there are people in our fellowship that teach immorality and idolatry and will not repent. The Righteous Judge will protect the fellowship from their influence.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

P.S. It should be noted that the normal translation of ἰδοὺ is behold.

Passage NKJV wording
Revelation 1:7 Behold, He is coming with clouds…”
Revelation 3:11 Behold, I am coming quickly!”
Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door and knock.”
Revelation 4:1 “I looked, and behold, a door standing open in heaven…”
Revelation 4:2 “and behold, a throne set in heaven…”
Revelation 5:5 Behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah…”
Revelation 6:2 “And I looked, and behold, a white horse.”
Revelation 6:5 “and behold, a black horse…”
Revelation 6:8 “And I looked, and behold, a pale horse.”
Revelation 6:12 “and behold, there was a great earthquake…”
Revelation 7:9 “After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude…”
Revelation 9:12 Behold, still two more woes are coming…”
Revelation 11:14 Behold, the third woe is coming quickly.”
Revelation 12:3 “and behold, a great, fiery red dragon…”
Revelation 14:1 “Then I looked, and behold, a Lamb standing on Mount Zion…”
Revelation 14:14 “Then I looked, and behold, a white cloud…”
Revelation 16:15 Behold, I am coming as a thief.”
Revelation 19:11 “Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse.”
Revelation 21:3 Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men…”
Revelation 21:5 Behold, I make all things new.”
Revelation 22:7 Behold, I am coming quickly!”
Revelation 22:12 “And behold, I am coming quickly…”

 

The Coming of Elijah

Before the coming of Messiah there must be the coming of His messenger. This is what the prophecies had foretold and this is fulfilled in a wily wilderness preacher around the time of Jesus.

  • The messenger will be a desert prophet (wilderness) crying out for repentance in preparation for the coming of the Lord. (Isaiah 40:1-3; 740 BC – 680 BC) 1 “Comfort, yes, comfort My people!” Says your God. 2 “Speak comfort to Jerusalem, and cry out to her, That her warfare is ended, That her iniquity is pardoned; For she has received from the Lord’s hand Double for all her sins.” 3 The voice of one crying in the wilderness: “Prepare the way of the Lord; Make straight in the desert A highway for our God.

Matthew, the tax-collector-turned-apostle, tells the reader that John the Baptist is the person of Isaiah’s prophecy. The strange prophet in the wilderness crying out for change, according to Matthew, is the prophesied voice. Look at it! In Matthew’s narrative John is referred to as the voice of one crying in the wilderness: this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 40:1-3). The main idea of Isaiah’s prophecy is that the person crying out is trying to get the people ready for the arrival of the Lord. Now think about what John the Baptist, according to Matthew, was saying to the people:

In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” (Matthew 3:1)

It is clear that John the Baptist is trying to get the people ready and that Matthew, a Jewish man, sees in the ministry of the baptizer the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy.

  • The messenger will confront evil, call for true righteousness, and then the Lord will come to His temple. (Malachi 3:1; 432 BC – 425 BC) 1 “Behold, I send My messenger, And he will prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, Will suddenly come to His temple, Even the Messenger of the covenant, In whom you delight. Behold, He is coming,” Says the Lord of hosts.

The prophecies foretold a person who would prepare the way before the Lord Himself: Behold, I send My messenger, and he will prepare the way before Me (Malachi 3:1). That is what John was doing – preparing the way before the Lord. John’s ministry attempts to ready the common people and priests for the coming of the Lord to His own temple. The baptizer had spoken openly and directly to the scribes and Pharisees about their need for repentance (Matthew 3:7-12). John’s denunciation of their ministry was aimed at helping them avoid an unpleasant confrontation by the Lord of the temple. Why? In the previously mentioned prophecy from Malachi there is a prediction that warns the priesthood (Malachi 3:2-3). It says to the religious leaders that the Lord they claim to be seeking will come suddenly or unexpectedly to His own temple. They did not listen to John and the Lord whom they were seeking suddenly came to His own temple (Malachi 3:1). [What Jesus found was precipitated a physical reprimand by the Lord Himself (John 2:13-17). The response of Jesus to uncleanness in the temple was itself a sign. He cleansed it by removing the corruption and chastening the corrupters. See Malachi 3:2-3.] John the Baptist, is a messenger arriving before the Messiah (Jesus of Nazareth) preparing the people and promoting genuine repentance in the priesthood.

  • The messenger will succeed in promoting a revival characterized by a turning of hearts Malachi 4:4-6 (432 BC – 425 BC) 4 “Remember the Law of Moses, My servant, Which I commanded him in Horeb for all Israel, With the statutes and judgments. 5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet Before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord. 6 And he will turn The hearts of the fathers to the children, And the hearts of the children to their fathers, Lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.”

This prophecy from Malachi mentions the return of Elijah. It says that Elijah the prophet would be sent before the coming of the day of the Lord. Both Matthew and Luke provide accounts of Jesus telling people that the Elijah of this prophecy is… John the Baptist (Matthew 11:7-15; 17:1-13; Luke 7:24-29; Mark 9:2-13). In essence, Jesus says that John, if they are willing to receive it, is the Elijah that that was mentioned by the prophet Malachi (Matthew 11:14-15).

14 And if you are willing to receive it, he is Elijah who is to come. 15 He who has ears to hear, let him hear! (Matthew 11:14-15)

If you are not willing to receive it, as evidence by a refusal to repent, then John is not Elijah to you; John himself would deny being Elijah when asked by the unrepentant religious leadership (John 1:19-21). To those willing to receive the gracious gift of a warning from God through the prophet in the wilderness, John is Elijah. In person? Reincarnation? No, he is Elijah in spirit (personality type) and power (Luke 1:5-17).

 

The Relevance

God still works this way. That is, Christ does not come casually into a life, a church, or a community. Before His arrival there will be people who will promote preparation. They are Elijahs if you are willing to receive them. These people will speak unapologetically about repentance, reordering priorities, and truth-telling. These things come before revival; repentance precedes renewal. (Among Gentiles repentance is not the same as among the Jews. John the Baptist could say repent because he is speaking to the Jews. They had been tutored by the law. Paul, an apostle to the Gentiles, starts the spiritual conversation differently. As Gentile they are ignorant concerning the law and the prophets. If he had started with “Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” they would have had questions? E.g., repent from what and whose kingdom. For the Gentile a repentance is still needed. But it is from believing in things other than Christ for salvation. After receiving Jesus, Gentiles willing to place their faith in Christ must be patiently taught to live for Him. See Matthew 28:18-20). Repentance is not entry-level Christianity. It is ongoing spiritual realism. It is the ongoing the refusal to make peace with sin wherever it is found.

John’s words to the Pharisees also remind the modern Jesus follower that heritage is not a substitute for holiness (Matthew 3:8-9).

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick Barnes

Seeing the Son of David

Seeing the Son of David (Matthew 1:1; 22:43; 45)

What is the point of telling me that Jesus is the Son of David? To answer that question we have to look at what the term means to the people of the New Testament. To people living in the New Testament period, the phrase Son of David was loaded. Using it meant that the person was expressing messianic expectations. All by itself the term Son of David is a messianic title. We miss the speaker’s message when we see them refer to Jesus as the Son of David and think of this as merely a genealogical description. Son of David carried royal, covenantal, and eschatological meaning. Those meaning can be found in the Hebrew Scriptures and Second Temple Jewish expectations.

  • The Royal Aspect of Son of David – The foundation of regarding the title Son of David is based on God’s covenant with David. The LORD promises King David a line and lasting kingdom through his descendant: “I will raise up your seed after you… and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.” (2 Samuel 7:12–13) Thus, to a Jewish hearer, “Son of David” meant: (1) A legitimate heir to David’s throne,  (2) a king whose right to rule came by divine promise, and (3) a ruler whose kingdom would have enduring, even eternal significance. This title was not merely a metaphor; it was a reference to God’s promise to David — a line and a lasting kingdom.

 

  • The Roles of the Son of David – Most Jews expected the Son of David to be: (1) a national deliverer, (2) arestorer of Israel’s sovereignty, (3) One who would defeat Israel’s enemies (Rome, in their context), and (4) A restorer of justice, law, and worship. How did they get these expections? These expectation were birthed and shaped by texts such as:
    • Isaiah 11:1–10 (a shoot from Jesse)

    • Jeremiah 23:5–6 (a righteous Branch from David)

    • Ezekiel 34:23–24 (David as shepherd-king)

Thus, Son of David implied political restoration, even if Jesus redefined how that restoration would occur.


What follows are my findings on the phrase
Son of David in the Gospel of Matthew.

  • Matthew 1:12 In the opening of the gospel and the beginning of Jesus’ genealogy. We must not miss that the first thing that the author would have us to know about His subject: He is descended from David. In this way Matthew sets out the premise of the book and begins his proof.
  • Matthew 1:20 — In the address of the angel to Joseph concerning Mary’s Baby we are told that the angels regard Joseph as a descendant of David. Through Joseph the Baby will inherit a legal right to the throne of David. It is important to note that Joseph is descended from David through Solomon and Jeconiah; this blood line cannot ascend to the throne.1 Mary is also descended from David through his son Nathan. Through her Jesus receives his blood right to the throne.
  • Matthew 9:27 — In the importunate prayers of the two blind men of Capernaum we are told that they regard Jesus as being the heir to the throne of His father. The blind can see who He is, friend!
  • Matthew 12:23 — In the question of the amazed multitudes concerning the identity of Jesus, there is the question of whether or not Jesus is the Son of David. The question of the crowd shows that Jesus is viewed through the lens of messianic expectations. To see Jesus properly is not to see him as a son of David (υἱὸς Δαυίδ) (Matthew 1:20) but the Son of David (ὁ υἱὸς Δαυίδ)(Matthew 12:23). Jesus of Nazareth is not merely in the line but is in fact the culmination of the line.
  • Matthew 15:22 — In the crying out of the Gentile woman of Canaan as she requested help for her daughter. The Gentiles know that the help of the nations will be a Jew (Matthew 15:27) and that he will be the heir to the throne of David.
  • Matthew 20:30-31 — Jesus is referred to as the Son of David twice in the requests for mercy of two blind men. It is not to be overlooked that in each case where he is addressed by the blind that they call him Lord and Son of David.
  • Matthew 21:9 — In the crying out of the multitude as Jesus enters the city.
  • Matthew 21:15 — In the crying out of the children as Jesus enters the temple.
  • Matthew 22:42 — In the answer of the Pharisees to the question of Jesus concerning the genealogy of the Christ.

Besides these occurrences David is mentioned by Jesus in His response to the criticism of His disciples (Matthew 12:2) and in exposing the ignorance of His enemies (Matthew 22:41-43, 45). The first and last mentions of David are key. In the former we are told that Jesus is descended from David. In the latter we are told that the expectation of the Israel was that the Messiah will be a descendant of David. Everything between these two statements serves to show that Angels, Jews, and Gentiles know or expect Messiah to be the Son of David. What is Matthew’s point? For those who are willing to look, the former tax collector would have us to know that Jesus is obviously the long-awaited Son of David. Matthew wants us to see that those who were willing could see it. Even the blind guys could see it (Matthew 9:27; 20:30-31). Do you?

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

Notes

1 Joseph’s line is considered disqualified from the throne of David because of a specific divine judgment pronounced on King Jeconiah (also called Coniah or Jehoiachin)—a judgment that affects the royal, legal line descending through Solomon (Jeremiah 22:24–30). This is a well-recognized issue in biblical theology and is central to understanding the genealogy of Jesus.

2 It has been said that the emdash is a sure sign that content has been generated by AI. In this case the emdashes represent the fact that the author is a nerd and uses them for writing and actually knows the keystroke in Windows to produce the character.

The Relentless Love of God for a Non-Prophet

The Relentless Love of God
Jonah 1:5-6
Mariners are professional sailors. They are experts in the matters of traveling on the sea and dealing with problems that are faced with sailing. Their situation is not run-of-the-mill bad weather at sea; these mariners are afraid. The situation is so bad that the sailors have given up hope of saving their cargo; it is being thrown overboard in an attempt to make the ship lighter. I can hear them saying
Forget the cargo! We can lose
the livelihood; we just want to
live. Men, let us try to live through
this. We will deal with the issue
of lost cargo if we can survive this
storm.
And their efforts to live were not just in the physical; before throwing cargo into the sea they reached out in the spiritual realm for help: 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐠𝐨𝐝 (Jonah 1:5). It is a chaotic scene. There is a storm threatening to destroy the ship and its crew, men are crying out to their gods for help, and cargo is being thrown out in a desperate attempt lighten the load and survive. But down in the lowest parts of the ship, Jonah is sleeping hard or was fast asleep. When the captain finds the slumbering prophet he is confused. “𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧, 𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐫?” That is, “What are you trying to tell us, man? What is the meaning of taking a nap when we are about to die? Call on your god!”
Jonah, oblivious to what has been happening, is depressed and has been trying to escape from (1) the presence of the Lord and (2) his own feelings of dismay. Sleep, like drugs or sex, is a coping mechanism and form of escape. He may be sleeping because he walked a bit to get to Joppa. But the fact that he retreated to the lowest part of the ship in an indicator that Jonah does not want fellowship with God or men. He rages against all wise judgement and is running from his calling (Proverbs 18:1).
A man who isolates himself
     seeks his own desire;
He rages against all
     wise judgment.
But his disobedience has put him and the people around him in peril. God had called the prophet for help; the Lord wanted Jonah to bring his word to a wicked city (Jonah 1:1). Jonah refused the call and ran from the Lord. Now he is the one that needs to call out for help. Ironic? Not really. His sin has found him out (Number 32:23) and God is relentlessly pressing on his prophet to come out of his hate-fuled rebellion back into relationship and back into service. The Lord loves Jonah and won’t let him go. Love never fails.
In His grip by His grace,
Roderick Barnes