Seeing the Son of David (Matthew 1:1-1:17; 22:43; 45)

What is the point of telling me that Jesus is the Son of David? What follows are my findings on the phrase Son of David in the Gospel of Matthew.

• Matthew 1:1 in the opening of the gospel and the beginning of Jesus’ genealogy. We must not miss that the first thing that the author would have us to know about His subject: He is descended from David. In this way Matthew sets out the premise of the book and begins his proof.
• Matthew 1:20 in the address of the angel to Joseph concerning Mary’s Baby we are told that the angels regard Joseph as a descendant of David.
• Matthew 9:27 in the importunate prayers of the two blind men of Capernaum we are told that they regard Jesus as being the heir to the throne of His father. The blind can see it!
• Matthew 12:23 in the question of the amazed multitudes concerning the identity of Jesus there is the question of whether or not Jesus is the Son of David. The question of the crowd shows that Jesus is viewed through the lens of messianic expectations. To see Jesus properly is not to see him as a son of David (υἱὸς Δαυίδ) (Matthew 1:20) but the Son of David (ὁ υἱὸς Δαυίδ)(Matthew 12:23). He is not merely in the line but is in fact the culmination of the line.
• Matthew 15:22 in the crying out of the Gentile woman of Canaan as she requested help for her daughter. The Gentiles know that the help of the nations will be a Jew (Matthew 15:27) and that he will be the heir to the throne of David.
• Matthew 20:30-31 twice in the requests for mercy of two blind men. It is not to be overlooked that in each case where he is addressed by the blind that they call him Lord and Son of David.
• Matthew 21:9 in the crying out of the multitude as Jesus enters the city.
• Matthew 21:15 in the crying out of the children as Jesus enters the temple.
• Matthew 22:42 in the answer of the Pharisees to the question of Jesus concerning the genealogy of the Christ.

Besides these occurrences David is mentioned by Jesus in His response to the criticism of His disciples (Matthew 12:2) and in exposing the ignorance of His enemies (Matthew 22:41-43, 45). The first and last mentions of David are key. In the former we are told that Jesus is descended from David. In the latter we are told that the expectation of the Israel was that the Messiah will be a descendant of David. Everything between these two statements serves to show that Angels, Jews, and Gentiles know or expect Messiah to be the Son of David. What is Matthew’s point? For those who are willing to look at the evidence, Matthew would have us to know that Jesus is the Son of David. Matthew wants us to see that those who were willing could see it. Even the blind guys could see it (Matthew 9:27; 20:30-31). Do you see the Son of David?

The Man to Mentor Our Messiah (Matthew 1:18-25)

How does Joseph get selected to be the mentor of Messiah, the man to raise our Redeemer, and an early guide for the Son of God? The answer to this question, as we will see in the discussion that follows, is good news for anyone that desires to be used by God. Read on and get insights for becoming someone that can be used greatly to advance good in this world and teach others effectively.

Joseph is an upright (δίκαιος) man and does not want to continue in a marriage relationship with someone who is plainly not worthy of trust. They have not consummated their marriage and Mary, as it seems to him, has already become pregnant in extramarital relations. If the conception happened before her betrothal she is a fornicator. If it happened after her betrothal she is an adulteress. In the former case the penalty is nothing less than public disgrace. In the latter is the case it is death. The text says that the conception and conspicuous results happened after betrothal (His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph) but prior to the consummation of their covenant (before they came together). See Luke 1:26-38 for a description of (1) Mary’s visit by the angel Gabriel and (2) how her Child would be conceived. Some of our Bible translations indicate that there was problem during the engagement of Joseph and Mary (NLT, CSB, GNT, CEB, NABRE); this is incorrect. This view is based on the false notion that modern engagement is the same thing as betrothal. Translations that do not use “engaged” but use “betrothed” instead are ESV, NASB, NKJV, KJV, NET, and RSV. These translations reflect the Jewish legal reality that betrothal was more binding than modern engagement:

Marriages were arranged for individuals by parents, and contracts were negotiated. After this was accomplished, the individuals were considered married and were called husband and wife. They did not, however, begin to live together. Instead, the woman continued to live with her parents and the man with his for one year. The waiting period was to demonstrate the faithfulness of the pledge of purity given concerning the bride. If she was found to be with child in this period, she obviously was not pure, but had been involved in an unfaithful sexual relationship. Therefore the marriage could be annulled. If, however, the one-year waiting period demonstrated the purity of the bride, the husband would then go to the house of the bride’s parents and in a grand processional march lead his bride back to his home. There they would begin to live together as husband and wife and consummate their marriage physically. Matthew’s story should be read with this background in mind. (Barbieri, 1985, p. 20)

Sexual immorality during engagement would be viewed as a breach of trust and could precipitate the end of the relationship. Such a sin during betrothal is adultery and carries the penalty of death (Deuteronomy 22:23-24). Either way two things are not in Joseph’s heart: (1) it was not in his heart to have her as his wife (Deuteronomy 24:1; Matthew 1:19) and (2) he did have it in himself to hurt her (John 8:4):

His love for her was demonstrated by his actions. He chose not to create a public scandal by exposing her condition to the judges at the city gate. Such an act could have resulted in Mary’s death by stoning (Deut. 22:23–24). (Barbieri, 1985, p. 20)

Joseph would like to divorce his wayward wife secretly. That is, instead of publicizing her infidelity and putting her life at risk he simply desires to be done with his disappointing marriage. She was supposed to be faithful to him. Obviously, as it would seem to anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about human reproduction, that is not the case. But, unknown to a just man named Joseph is the fact that Mary’s pregnancy is not an early insight into immoral character but the handiwork of the Holy Spirit. What seemed to be a problem was really part of the prescription for what ails man most. A virgin birth, though initially problematic for the carpenter, was an essential element in Heaven’s effort to save mankind – especially them that believe:

Though Matthew expounds nothing of its significance here, the virginal conception has regularly been understood as a way by which Jesus could be both fully human and fully divine. His father, in essence, was God, through the work of the Holy Spirit; his mother was the fully human woman, Mary. As fully God, Jesus was able to pay the eternal penalty for our sins (v. 21) for which finite humanity could not atone. As fully human he could be our adequate representative and substitutionary sacrifice.

(Blomberg, 1992, p. 58)

But God does not tell Joseph about the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit. He is left to look at the outworking and draw his own conclusion (Matthew 1:19-20). He is abandoned by the Almighty to assess unaided the situation and formulate a response (2 Chronicles 32:31). God has withdrawn in order that in the hurt inflicted by Mary the heart of Joseph could be held up for all to see. What are we seeing? To understand what we are seeing we have to refrain from a rush to interpret Joseph’s actions. He is a Jew and Jewish in his culture and he has a Jewish understanding of who God is and what God wants from him. He has learned what God wants from him through the Scriptures:

• The Self-Description of God in Answering Moses’ Question (The Question – Exodus 33:18; The Answer – Exodus 34:6-7) [~1446-1406 BC]
• The Glory of a Man (Proverbs 19:11) [~950 BC]
• Key Characteristics in the Creator (Psalm 89:11-14) [~1000-960 BC]
• The Marriage of the Almighty (Hosea 2:16-20) [~755-725 BC]
• Expectations on the Nation (Hosea 12:6) [~755-725 BC]
• The Goal and Opportunity for Glory that God Gives Each Person — (Micah 6:8) [~740-700 BC]

And what God wants is found in Joseph. This just man (Matthew 1:19) is the epitome and example of the man described by the prophet Micah 6:8:

⁸ He has shown you, O man, what is good;

And what does the Lord require of you

But to do justly,

To love mercy,

And to walk humbly with your God?

The New King James Version (Mic 6:8).

Who is the man that would have a hand in raising the Son of God? Who is the man that can be given charge of the greatest of all gifts and provide guidance to the Son of God for living godly. This is the man!

The Conduct of the Carpenter

Foremost in my mind, as I examine this passage, is the difference between Joseph’s concept of forgiveness and my own. For me forgiveness is transactional and involves a trade. But if forgiveness is the idea that, after the transaction based on the proper trading, (1) if I can hurt you I wont and (2) if I can help you I will, the prerequisites are conspicuously absent. Joseph’s response to this situation is a sermon that tells me to love my enemies. His handling is a foreshadowing of the Savior’s supplication from the cross to forgive the people jeering. Forgiveness here is not a doing that can be derived from a policy but is an emanation from a nature, an expression of his identity, and an outworking of my commitment to be godly.

Forgiveness, as it is seen in Joseph, is not a function of the offenders offer of an acceptable apology and is not based on the behavior of the person that has bruised me or beaten me or crucified me. It proactively loves when the other person persecutes me, it aggressively activates and avails me of all resources in the advance of the greatest good for the one who has wronged me, and administers a balm of mercy on the one who is mean to me. Flowing out of a heart that has been forgiven by God is devotion to doing right by God in a forgiveness that engages the enemy with mercy.

The Character of the Carpenter

But who is this man who will mentor Messiah, have a hand in raising our Redeemer, and give guidance to the young Son of God? The character of the carpenter and the calling on his life speaks volumes to us about where to focus on changes.

• Joseph is Calm (Matthew 1:18-19; James 1:19-20) – Jesus grew in wisdom and stature (Luke 2:52). Before Jesus would come to clearly understand his identity and calling God would have real manhood demonstrated by a godly man.
• Joseph is Compassionate (Micah 6:8; Matthew 1:19; Leviticus 20:10) – The aim of Joseph is to do justly and to love mercy. He is, by his actions, an effective exhortation toward being both just and merciful.
• Joseph is Considerate (Matthew 1:20) — The carpenter considers his steps. In a sense he measures twice so that he will only have to cut once.
• Joseph Promptly Obeys (Matthew 1:24-25) — Notice that Joseph is a man of obedience. We see it in two ways: (1) Joseph immediately took to him his wife (Matthew 1:24) and (2) he named the boy Jesus (Matthew 1:25). This will be a pattern for Joseph — he is found responding rapidly to the revealed will of God.

Roderick’s Notes on Luke

2 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.”

When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born.

So they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:

‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,

Are not the least among the rulers of Judah;

For out of you shall come a Ruler

Who will shepherd My people Israel.’ ”

Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared. And he sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him, bring back word to me, that I may come and worship Him also.”

•When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was. •When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceedingly great joy. And when they had come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down and worshiped Him. And when they had opened their treasures, they presented gifts to Him: gold, •frankincense, and myrrh.

Then, being divinely warned in a dream that they should not return to Herod•, they departed for their own country another way.

Flight into Egypt

Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, “Arise, take the young Child and His mother, •flee to Egypt, and stay there until •I bring you word; for Herod •will seek the young Child to destroy Him.”

When he arose, he took the young Child and His mother by night and departed for Egypt, and was there until the death of Herod, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, “Out of Egypt I called My Son.”

What God Wants for Christmas (Matthew 2:1-14)

Introduction

We are all familiar with the story and song of the wise men that visit Jesus. There are three of them and they are kings. They are from three different ethnic groups and came from the west to present their gifts to Jesus shortly after his birth.

We Three Kings of Orient Are by John Henry Hopkins, Jr (1857)

We three kings of Orient are;

bearing gifts we traverse afar,

field and fountain, moor and mountain,

following yonder star.

Refrain:

O star of wonder, star of light,

star with royal beauty bright,

westward leading, still proceeding,

guide us to thy perfect light.

Born a King on Bethlehem’s plain,

gold I bring to crown him again,

King forever, ceasing never,

over us all to reign. [Refrain]

In fact, based on the typical nativity scene, the barn animals, shepherds, three kings, Yoseph, Miriam, and newborn Yeshua are all together for a moment. That is, based on the nativity scenes we can purchase online or in the big box stores, there was a point in time when the shepherds from the field were at the manger with the wise men. At least that what they are selling me on Amazon.com.

Figure 1: Amazon – 14 Piece Nativity Set Includes People and Animals (Amazon, 2021)

The real story is quite a bit different. Based on the Bible the shepherds and the wise men do not arrive on the scene at the same time (Luke 2:15-16; Matthew 2:9-11). Not even close. As we consider the real story based on the Scriptures we will see that the plain truth with what the big box and online outlets are selling.

More importantly, because academic accuracy is not the point of Christ-centered preaching, in what Matthew records we see five very valuable truths for us today:

• First, we see God’s great and gracious love for the nations.
• Second, the text is telling us in no uncertain terms what gift to give the Son of God this year.
• Third, we witness ungodly reactions to Yeshua’s right to reign in our lives.
• Fourth, we view a principle concerning revelation and ministry.
• Fifth, we see a principle of provision for those called to work for God.

God’s Great and Gracious Love for the Nations (Matthew 2:1-2; Daniel 5:11)

¹ Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, ² saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.”

Our story picks up after Jesus was born in Bethlehem. (Matthew may assume that his readership is aware of the prophecy that says where Messiah was born. See Micah 5:2. He is a Jew writing to Jews about a Jew. In any case, since he aims to prove that Jesus is Messiah, it supports the point he is making by mentioning the birth place of Jesus.) To give us an idea of the time Matthew says that it was in the days of Herod the king.

Behold (1:1) this sight, says the former tax collector. Into Jerusalem come a group prominent and influential Gentiles from Babylon, Persia, and Media (modern day Iraq-Iran region). They are astrologers known throughout the region for their sorceries; officially they are employed to make sense of dreams and signs in the heavens. It is worth noting that the rabbis of the time do not think highly of them. The Sanhedrin regards the act of gathering information from the magi as a crime punishable by death.¹ These men have come from afar looking for Someone. In fact, the men arrive asking a question: Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? Wow! The sight of a group of magi coming to town is wildly unusual. Their question, though, is unsettling. Why?

• First, why do these non-Jews believe the King of the Jews has been born?

• Second, why do they care?

To answer the first question let us consider what they have seen and where they are from. We see in the text that these wise men have seen His star while watching from the East. (μάγοι is the plural of magi. From this word we get the words magic and magician.) That star was to them a heavenly indicator that Messiah had been born. To understand why they make this connection we have to look at the history of the Jews and ultimately the great grace of God to the nations.

Why did these Eastern wise men even correlate the birth of Jesus to the appearance of a star? To be sure, the connection between a star and the birth of Messiah was recorded in Torah. And it was actually revealed to an astrologer — Balaam. Although Balaam had been hired by the king of Moab to curse the Jews, he was moved by God somewhere between 1400 BC and1200 BC to make the following prophecy:

¹⁷ I see Him, but not now; I behold Him, but not near;

A Star shall come out of Jacob;

A Scepter shall rise out of Israel,

And batter the brow of Moab,

And destroy all the sons of tumult.  (Numbers 24:17)

The Star and the Scepter of this prophecy are both recognized by rabbinical teachings as messianic. Why are they messianic:

• The Star – Consider the mention of a star coming out Jacob. A star, for the Jews, is a heavenly body given for signs and seasons (Genesis 1:14-15). The star seen in the vision of Balaam is a sign of a special season – the earthly ministry of the Messiah has begun.
• The Scepter – A scepter is a royal staff or rod that symbolizes a ruler’s authority, kingship, and right to govern. It is not a weapon—it is a symbol of legal and sovereign power. In this poetic literature the Scepter is a reference to a future Ruler.

Both the Star and the Scepter come out Israel. So, the special revelation of God to the Jews contains a clear and recognized connection between the appearance of a special Star and the rise of a ruler from Israel. Put together they are an allusion to Messiah. But the fact that the Jews have this in their writings does not explain how the Eastern astrologers made the connection.

Let us not forget the deportation of Jews by Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar some 600 years prior to the birth of Yeshua (605 BC). Some of the Jews that were deported remained in Babylon long after their initial captivity and eventually came into seats of power and prominence (Brown, 1994, p. 169). Most notable among them was Daniel. Daniel was taken captive from Jerusalem when he was probably about 16 years of age. He was a young, good-looking, intelligent man with an uncompromising commitment to God (Daniel 1:1-6). After many trials and tribulations Daniel, a captive and eunuch (Isaiah 56:3-5; Daniel 1:3, 6) in the royal court, became a leader in the land. After learning the language of his captures and proving himself to be reliable and excellent in all he did, Daniel was promoted:

⁴⁷ The king answered Daniel, and said, “Truly your God is the God of gods, the Lord of kings, and a revealer of secrets, since you could reveal this secret.” ⁴⁸ Then the king promoted Daniel and gave him many great gifts; and he made him ruler over the whole province of Babylon, and chief administrator over all the wise men [חַכִּים‎ (ḥakkîm) wise men] of Babylon. (Daniel 2:47-48)

Did you see that? An intelligent Jew with a heart to serve God, originally brought in as a slave, was put in charge of the wise men. In due time God made a Jew who loves God the president of Hakkim University, Wise Guy College, Magi Institute of Astrology in Babylon. Listen to the words of a queen when her husband King Belshazzar, the son of the previously mentioned King Nebuchadnezzar, needed help interpreting a sign:

¹¹ There is a man in your kingdom in whom is the Spirit of the Holy God. And in the days of your father, light and understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, were found in him; and King Nebuchadnezzar your father—your father the king—made him chief of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers. ¹² Inasmuch as an excellent spirit, knowledge, understanding, interpreting dreams, solving riddles, and explaining enigmas were found in this Daniel, whom the king named Belteshazzar, now let Daniel be called, and he will give the interpretation. (Daniel 5:11)

By the time Nebuchadnezzar’s reign is over Daniel has been made chief of the magicians. So, how did the wise men make the connection with the star and the birth of Jesus (Matthew 2:1-2)? And where did they get the information? The connection was made for them by a man of God. (Balaam was a contributor. But ultimately the record was kept officially by who? The Jews.) And the sign of ruler’s birth was communicated to them by a man of God. They have Daniel’s text book Messianic Signs and Balaam’s prior contribution What to Look for When Messiah Comes.

But, if they have Daniel’s record, why are they asking where the Messiah is? Approximately two years have passed. They do not assume that the child is still in Bethlehem. (The prophecy concerning the birthplace of Messiah would have been recorded in about 735 BC. But knowing that Messiah was born there does not mean that is where he is when they arrive two years later.) How do the wise men intend to solve the problem of finding where Messiah is nearly two years after the star appeared. That is easy: go to Jerusalem and ask the Jews (Isaiah 2:3; John 4:22).

But why? That is, why did they come? The ability to make the connection, in light of what has been shared, makes sense. But why make the trek? This reason is simple – to worship Him. We have to see that this also most certainly based on Daniel’s influence. He would be given a vision of the Son of Man that revealed His relationship to God, the scope of His dominion, and the right response to His reign.

¹³ I was watching in the night visions,

And behold, One like the Son of Man,

Coming with the clouds of heaven!

He came to the Ancient of Days,

And they brought Him near before Him.

¹⁴ Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom,

That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion,

Which shall not pass away,

And His kingdom the one

Which shall not be destroyed. (Daniel 7:13-14)

Based on what they understood from their time under Daniel’s authority and teaching, the coming Messiah will be seated with God in authority, has an everlasting kingdom, and is to be worshipped by the nations. The only right response to the birth of the King of the Jews is worship. And thus we are introduced to the first thing that we must see in all of this.

What God Wants – God has been at working providing a witness for Himself to the nations (Isaiah 43:12; 44:8). Even in the miserable moments of captivity those whose lives belonged to God were being used to communicate the truth about the coming of the King. God’s grace is so great and unrelenting that He would use a remnant of His people as a witness even as they suffer for the ongoing wickedness of their nation’s majority. What does God want? In the midst of a mess you did not make God wants you and I to make the most of every moment to teach people about him. Our circumstances, be they pleasant or painful, are arranged by God so that we can help people know Christ.

• Mentor People in the Midst of Your Mess
• Point People to the Author of Creation for Revelation (Daniel 2:27-28)

God was at work through the prophecy of Balaam and the captivity of Daniel to make Himself known to the nations. Through His leading and grace worldly spiritists involved in demonic practices were given the truth about when the Messiah would be born, what sign to look for, and the proper response.

Ungodly Reactions to Yeshua’s Right to Reign in Our Lives (Matthew 2:3-6)

³ When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. ⁴ And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. ⁵ So they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:

⁶ ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,

Are not the least among the rulers of Judah;

For out of you shall come a Ruler

Who will shepherd My people Israel.’ ”

Herod… and all Jerusalem with him were troubled (from ταράσσω – be troubled; be disturbed. This word is used to communicate emotional distress. See Matthew 14:26 and Luke 1:12.) Why are they distressed? The idea that there were only three wise men is not part of the text. The distress and high visibility of the visitors indicates that the number was larger than three.

So there were at least two, but maybe there were twenty, or two hundred, or two thousand. There were enough to cause the whole city of Jerusalem to be tremendously stirred up (Mt. 2: 3), and this implies that, perhaps, there were considerably more than just three of them. (Fruchtenbaum, 2016, pg ).

The king is troubled because he is not the king of the Jews. In fact he is not a Jew but an Edomite – a descendant of Esau. And Herod is unwilling to tolerate even the thought that someone might want the throne. Herod the Great kills his favorite wife (Mariamne) and three of his own sons (Alexander, Aristobulus, and Antipater) because he believes they are trying to replace him. Ultimately he is threatened by Yeshua’s birthright to reign.

The same is true of the religious leadership. Instead of being satisfied with the honor of stewardship they have coveted the things of God and have set their hearts on ownership of what belongs to the Son of God. They cannot be content to be vinedressers but would even kill the heir in order that the vineyard would be theirs (Matthew 21:38; Luke 20:14; Mark 12:7).

But let us not sit as judges of Herod and the rulers. Instead of condemning them for the criminal attitudes toward Christ we should examine ourselves. The hard questions, the ones we are reluctant to ask ourselves, and the ones for which we often do not want the answer are “In what ways am I like Herod? How am I similar to the people who should rejoice with the news of the Messiah in our midst but find myself unsettled and even rejecting His right to reign in my life.”

What God Wants – the realization that Jesus is just and holy makes me uncomfortable with Him coming into my life. The wickedness in me wants to keep doing my will and not His and rejects His right to reign in my family, in my friendships, in my finances, and in my faith. I find myself refusing to release a throne that belongs to Him and that I know He wants. God wants (1) a willingness to give the Son His inheritance and (2) authenticity about my own fallenness and need for a Savior.

The passage about Herod and the priests and scribes reveals ungodly reactions to Yeshua. In the former their is an immediate hostile rejection that will become manifest in a plot to kill the Son (Matthew 2:16-18). In the case of the priests there is disbelief and disinterest. They do not believe that anything of substance could be known or revealed by God to the Gentiles and they manifest a disinterest in giving up what they are doing to make ready for the revelation and reign of The King of the Jews. Religious folk do this a lot. We talk about our desire to see Jesus come again but do little or nothing of substance to make ready for His return. In fact, we are sometimes found in the ongoing practice of things He does not like and are made to feel uncomfortable when people talk about His second coming. God wants us to admit that we have these issues and come to Him for healing (Matthew 13:15).

The Sinister Plot to Kill the King (Matthew 2:7-8; 16-18)

⁶ ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Are not the least among the rulers of Judah; For out of you shall come a Ruler Who will shepherd My people Israel.’ ” ⁷ Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared.

The sinful ruler, upon hearing that the real King of the Jews has arrived, begins concocting a sinister plot to eliminate Yeshua. To be effective in the elimination of his rival, Herod has to gather some information. His goal is to develop a profile that can be used to target anyone that might be the actual King. Creating a good profile requires answers to two questions:

• Target Region Question – Where was the King of the Jews born? With this question Herod is trying to narrow the geographical scope of a search. He is also attempting to mitigate the number of people that will have to be killed. It is not that he cares for the people. If he cannot minimize the number of people that have to be killed he will catalyze and invite scrutiny from Caesar Augustus that he would rather avoid.
• Target Age Question – What time did the star appear? With the question Herod is determining the age of the Christ. This information can be used to decide which children will be put to death (Matthew 2:16-17).

Good religious people, even if they have no real interest in the Person or program of God, can give you some great information. They are full of it. Herod knew that the religious rulers could be consulted for the whereabouts of the birthplace of the King of the Jews.

To get what he wanted Herod called a secret meeting. Why was it a secret? I see three reasons. First, when people are up to no good they want to remain in the darkness lest their deeds come to the light and be clearly seen (John 3:20-21; Ephesians 5:11-13). Second, people who want to remain in control compartmentalize information so that no one but them has the big picture (Wikipedia, Compartmentalization). Third, because the Sanhedrin has made consulting with the wise men a crime punishable by death, Herod wants to avoid the appearance of conspiring with them to get information. He does not fear execution by the religious leadership but needs to mitigate the appearance of being altogether without regard for Jewish law and customs.

In that clandestine meeting with the religious leaders Herod is told that the Christ was to be born in Bethlehem. The priests and scribes knew that much; this information had been provided by God through the prophet Micah over 700 years earlier (Micah 5:2). When King Herod got his information he was ready to put the next phase of his evil plot into action – use the wise men to get the exact location of the target. After all, they are really good at using information to find things. Let them finish the work they have begun and use the the results (Matthew 2:16-17). This brings us to the theme of this article.

What God Wants – What part am I playing? Am I a help to God as He brings the King and His kingdom. Or do I (1) harbor a wicked desire to remain in control, (2) have people thinking I am trying to help, while I (3) hinder the work, and (4) plot to harm the workers. God wants me to prayerfully and in light of His Scripture to consider what role I am playing in His work to tell the world about the Son.

This type of self-assessment is part of why the Scriptures were given to us. Instead of looking down over our noses at Herod, shaking our heads in disapproval at the priests, and condemning the other criminals we see in the pages. What does God want? God wants us to use these pages to come to Him with the hard questions about who we really are.

¹¹ Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come. (1 Corinthians 10:11)

The Principle of Revelation and Doing-it-Differently Ministry (Matthew 2:9-11; John 12:29; Acts 26:12-14; 22:6-9)

⁹ When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was. ¹⁰ When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceedingly great joy. ¹¹ And when they had come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down and worshiped Him. And when they had opened their treasures, they presented gifts to Him: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. ¹² Then, being divinely warned in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed for their own country another way.  

The wise men, accustomed to working in the service of kings to get answers, departed in search of the Child. What happens next was unexpected even by them. The star which they had seen in the East went before them. This raises the question about what it is they were seeing. Was it an actual star? Even a rudimentary understanding of what a star is says that what they saw was not what modern readers call a star. A fusion reactor based on the combining of hydrogen atoms to make helium atoms that was close enough to stand over where the young Child was… don’t make no sense. A literal star would incinerate Bethlehem, Judea, the continent, and the planet. So what was it? It was what had appeared around the angels to the shepherds and what had led the Jews in times of old at night – the shekinah glory of God.

Is it strange that only the wise men saw it? That is, does it seem odd that only the wise men could see what they called a star leading them to a particular home in Bethlehem? Not really.

For Your Eyes Only (Matthew 2:9-10)

• Word of Encouragement for Jesus Alone – ²⁹ Therefore the people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, “An angel has spoken to Him.”  (John 12:29)
• Calling for Saul Alone – ⁶ “Now it happened, as I journeyed and came near Damascus at about noon, suddenly a great light from heaven shone around me. ⁷ And I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?’ ⁸ So I answered, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said to me, ‘I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you are persecuting.’ ⁹ “And those who were with me indeed saw the light and were afraid, but they did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me.  (Acts 22:6-9)

What God Wants – The principle is plain. Revelation is given to the worker for the work and not to the crowd for general consumption. As God is working in and through you to do something new it is often the case that others cannot see what you see. It is for your eyes and ears only. What you see or what He is leading you to will eventually become apparent. Until then you may have to accept the fact that your vision for a ministry, for a change in your church, for a different way of doing things is for your eyes.

A mentor and good brother, Dr. Alejandro Mandes, shared this word with me years ago as I was starting a ministry. “Roderick, do not be upset with late adopters.” He was telling me that there are things that I would have a vision for that would not get the support I wanted when I started.

Part Ways with These People (Matthew 2:12)

Notice that God does not want the wise men to go back to Herod. What do you think Herod would do to them wants he got his information? God is not only graciously giving the Gentiles an opportunity to worship the King He is also protecting them from potential harm through those bent on preventing the good news or telling the truth about his dastardly deeds. Now we see why the meeting was kept a secret. By keeping the groups separate it would lessen the likelihood that they would have told the truth about what he was trying to do:

¹⁶ Then Herod, when he saw that he was deceived by the wise men, was exceedingly angry; and he sent forth and put to death all the male children who were in Bethlehem and in all its districts, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had determined from the wise men. ¹⁷ Then was fulfilled what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying:

¹⁸ “A voice was heard in Ramah,

Lamentation, weeping, and great mourning,

Rachel weeping for her children,

Refusing to be comforted,

Because they are no more.”

A Principle of Provision for Those Called to Work for God (Matthew 2:13-15)

¹³ Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, “Arise, take the young Child and His mother, flee to Egypt, and stay there until I bring you word; for Herod will seek the young Child to destroy Him.” ¹⁴ When he arose, he took the young Child and His mother by night and departed for Egypt, ¹⁵ and was there until the death of Herod, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, “Out of Egypt I called My Son.”  

The wise men have made it possible for Yoseph, Miriam, and Yeshua to make a break from the region. How? Their gifts were actually a provision for a poor family that would be seeking asylum in another country. In the gold, frankincense, and myrrh are symbols and the things needed for a trip they are about to make. Concerning the symbols listen to Fruchtenbaum:

The wise men left behind three gifts: gold and frankincense and myrrh (Mt. 2: 11). All of these elements have symbolic significance. Gold is the symbol of kingship; Yeshua is the King. Frankincense is the symbol of deity; Yeshua is God. Myrrh is the symbol of death and sacrifice; Yeshua is the final sacrifice for sin. While the first line of the popular Christmas carol, “We three kings of Orient are,” is not biblical, the last line is correct: “God and King and Sacrifice.” (Fruchtenbaum, 2016, Kindle Locations 7806-7810)

In the text Joseph receives another special revelation. This is the second time an angel appears to him in a dream. And it is the second time that we see on display the character of a man that can be used to raised the Son of God. Immediate obedience is what we saw when the angel told him not to be afraid to take Miriam as his wife; he arose and brought her to his home (Matthew 1:20-25). And now it is immediate obedience that we see in Joseph when it is revealed that God wants to make the Child and mother safe by getting them away from Herod.

What God Wants (Matthew 2:13-14) – If Mary is the first to receive Christ, Joseph is the first missionary using ministry support in promoting and protecting the gospel. Is it not obvious that God wants people that He can use to glorify Himself and help others? For families and society God wants people that can be counted on to immediately obey with the aim of promoting, protecting, and providing for others. While He can use them God does not need people of influence or affluence. And the Almighty will provide what is needed for the worker to do the work (Matthew 2:11).

GOD IS GOING TO GIVE ME

WHAT I NEED TO DO

HIS WORK!

Attempting to Persecute the Son (Matthew 2:16-18)

¹⁶ Then Herod, when he saw that he was deceived by the wise men, was exceedingly angry; and he sent forth and put to death all the male children who were in Bethlehem and in all its districts, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had determined from the wise men. ¹⁷ Then was fulfilled what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying:

¹⁸ “A voice was heard in Ramah,

Lamentation, weeping, and great mourning,

Rachel weeping for her children,

Refusing to be comforted,

Because they are no more.”

Deceiving a Despot (Matthew 2:16) After some amount of time it dawns on the despot Herod that he has been deceived. “They should have made it back by now. And I am getting reports that they actually did not go to Bethlehem.” For someone as self-absorbed and evil as Herod, when the wise men’s decision departed for their own country another way it was an infuriating encounter with the truth. It was yet another reminder that (1) he was not in control and (2) he was not regarded as the King of the Jews. I have said it often. But it is worth repeating: When people that you serve are being difficult, you have threatened their ego, their empire, or their economy. With this man, it is all three.

Illegitimate King Herod will now do what he has always done — eliminate the threat. Prior to this time Herod has had a practice of putting to death anyone he deems a danger to his reign:

37 BCE — Purge of Hasmonean leadership

• Upon securing the throne with Roman backing, Herod executed many members of the Sanhedrin and rival Hasmonean supporters who opposed his rule.

35 BCE — Execution of Aristobulus III

• Aristobulus III, the popular Hasmonean high priest and brother of Mariamne I, was drowned under suspicious circumstances.
• Motive: His royal lineage and popularity made him a rival claimant.

30 BCE — Execution of Hyrcanus II

• Former High Priest and Hasmonean patriarch.
• Accused of treason; likely executed to extinguish Hasmonean legitimacy.

29 BCE — Execution of Mariamne I (Herod’s wife)

• Accused of adultery and conspiracy.
• Her Hasmonean bloodline posed a dynastic threat to Herod’s rule.

7 BCE — Execution of sons Alexander and Aristobulus

• Sons of Mariamne I and Herod.
• Charged with treason after prolonged court intrigue.
• Herod reportedly said it was “safer to be Herod’s pig than his son.”

5 BCE — Execution of Antipater

• Herod’s eldest son and heir apparent (by Doris).
• Convicted of plotting to poison Herod.
• Executed just days before Herod’s own death.

And he was aided by the wise men in developing a profile. This puts into perspective tools. The wise men were not evil and actually sought opportunity to worship the one born King of the Jews. Herod’s heart motivates him to use otherwise good or morally neutral things for evil purposes: (1) the region to focus on was based on information he had gained from the chief priests and scribes and (2) the age component of the profile of who to kill is based on the time which he had determine from the wise men. Consider this list:

• Satan — Language and Truth Twisted into Deception (Genesis 3:1–5). Good/Neutral Thing: Language, reason, and partial truth. Evil Use: Satan does not invent falsehood wholesale; he selectively quotes and reframes God’s words, exploiting Eve’s capacity for reason and trust. Language—given to name, bless, and commune—becomes the means of spiritual death.
• Cain — Creation Turned into an Instrument of Murder (Genesis 4:3–8). Good/Neutral Thing: The created order, physical strength, and environment. Evil Use: Cain uses what God made good—his surroundings and human capability—to murder his brother, allowing wounded worship and jealousy to culminate in violence.
• Pharaoh — Administrative Power Used for Genocide (Exodus 1:8–14; 1:15–22). Good/Neutral Thing: Government authority, census awareness, and labor organization. Evil Use: Pharaoh employs state administration and population control mechanisms to suppress Israel and command the killing of Hebrew infants in response to a perceived future threat.
• Balaam — Spiritual Insight Converted into Strategic Corruption (Numbers 22–25; 31:16). Good/Neutral Thing: Prophetic knowledge and spiritual discernment. Evil Use: Unable to curse Israel directly, Balaam weaponizes his insight by advising Moab to entice Israel into idolatry and immorality, achieving through corruption what he could not through proclamation.
• Saul — Royal Authority Justifying Personal Jealousy (1 Samuel 18–26). Good/Neutral Thing: Kingship and responsibility to guard God’s anointed order. Evil Use: Saul repurposes his throne to pursue David, masking fear and insecurity under the guise of royal duty and divine zeal.
• Absalom — Justice Language Used to Steal Hearts (2 Samuel 15:1–6). Good/Neutral Thing: Advocacy, empathy, and public discourse. Evil Use: Absalom exploits legitimate grievances and compassionate speech to undermine trust in David and foment rebellion, turning justice rhetoric into a tool of insurrection.
• The Chief Priests — Law and Piety Used to Kill the Righteous (Matthew 26–27; John 11:47–53). Good/Neutral Thing: Legal process, religious authority, and theological reasoning. Evil Use: Courts, witnesses, and doctrine—intended to preserve truth—are manipulated to secure the execution of Jesus under the pretense of protecting the nation.

The evil is not the gun, it is not artificial intelligence, or politics. The problem is in the hearts of those who have these things. In each case, the evil does not lie in the thing itself—knowledge, power, law, language, or authority—but in the heart that bends it toward self-preservation, fear, or pride. “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked.” (Jeremiah 17:9, NKJV)

Herod fits squarely in this biblical pattern: not ignorant brutality, but calculated corruption of God-given means to oppose God-ordained purposes. We must prayerfully ask God: “Tell me the truth. In what way am I like Herod – using things in ways that are contrary to your kingdom, against your express agenda, and with the goal of promoting my own vain glory and illegitimate right to reign.”

Conclusion

In the opening of this not-so-brief posting I mentioned things that we would see. First, we have looked at the grace of God to the nations; He revealed His plan to bring His King into the world to those who were outside of the covenants. Hundreds of years before Messiah was born He would Daniel in the misery of captivity to make His plan known to the Gentiles. Second, we have seen ungodly reactions to the revealing of the King. There was hostility in Herod and disinterest in the religious leadership. Overall we see in them what, if we are honest, we can sometimes see in ourselves – angst and apathy toward Yeshua’s right to reign. Third and fourth, we saw principles of ministry. Finally, as promised, I set before you what God wants as a gift. You. In all of this God makes it clear that he wants to the free will offering of yourself. While some are loathe to give Him this gift the wise men are examples. In them we see a positive example and exhortation to give the gift of ourselves to the King. Out of our lives we give our time, our talent, and treasure to be used in His service.

Notes

¹ There were other similar crimes for which the Sanhedrin was also committed to sentence people to death. “As to the magianism, Rab and Samuel (differ thereon): one maintains that it is sorcery, the other, blasphemy. For R. Zutra b. Tobiah said in Rab’s name: He who learns a single thing from a Magian is worthy of death.” (Gruber, 1996, p. 180)

References

Amazon. (2021). Set of 14 Christmas 14 Inch Real Life Nativity Set Includes People and Animals, https://www.amazon.com/14-Piece-Christmas-Nativity-Set/dp/B00H53WGAC

Barbieri, L. A., Jr. (1985). Matthew. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures. Victor Books.

Blomberg, C. (1992). Matthew (Vol. 22, p. 58). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

Brown, Raymond E., S.S. (1994). The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke (New York: Doubleday, 1994).

Fruchtenbaum, Arnold G. (2016). Yeshua: The Life of Messiah from a Messianic Jewish Perspective – Vol. 1. Ariel Ministries.

Gruber, Daniel. (1996). Gruber, Rabbi Akiba’s Messiah and the Origin of Rabbinic Judaism (July 1996)

Wikipedia, Compartmentalization, Obtained 2021.12.27 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(information_security)

Introduction

We can hear the word of the Lord Jesus, affirm its truth, and still hold on to practices that contradict it. A Jesus follower may attend church, use Christian language, and speak about faith while leaving certain habits, loyalties, and sources of security unexamined. Acts 19:11–20 brings us face to face with an important question: How am I responding to the word I have received?

The events in Ephesus are ancient, but the issue they expose remains relevant. God worked extraordinary miracles through Paul, confirming His messenger and demonstrating His power. Others attempted to use Jesus’ name without submitting to Him. Even some who had believed continued practicing magic until the events Luke records moved them to confess their deeds and destroy the materials that sustained those practices. The Lord’s word was spreading, and its power became visible as people brought their lives into obedience to it.

This passage helps the modern Jesus follower understand the importance of receiving and responding properly to the word of the Lord Jesus. His name calls for reverence, His message calls for obedience, and His authority reaches into the parts of life we may prefer to keep unchanged. As we study these events, we should ask where we need to confess sin, abandon competing allegiances, and remove the means of returning to what Christ calls us to leave behind. The word we receive must be allowed to prevail in the life we live.

      ¹¹ Now God worked unusual miracles by the hands of Paul, ¹² so that even handkerchiefs or aprons were brought from his body to the sick, and the diseases left them and the evil spirits went out of them.

Authenticating the Messenger (Acts 19:11-12; Supporting Passages Acts 5:11-12)

Acts 19:11-12 – Paul was working with his hands during his ministry in Ephesus, providing for his own needs and those of his companions (Acts 20:33–35).¹ He was a tentmaker by trade (Acts 18:3). In that work, it would have been natural for him to wear an artisan’s apron and use a cloth to wipe sweat from his brow. These ordinary articles fit Luke’s description of the handkerchiefs (σουδάρια, soudária, sweat cloths) and aprons (σιμικίνθια, simikínthia, work aprons) taken to the sick. Luke says they were brought from his body (ἀπὸ τοῦ χρωτὸς αὐτοῦ, apó tou chrotós aftoú, literally “from his skin”). Through articles that had touched the apostle, God brought healing and expelled evil spirits. Two things are being accomplished thereby: (1) demonstrating the power of Jesus’ kingdom and (2) authenticating Jesus’ servant (Acts 19:11–12).

Some commentators say that God is merely accommodating the beliefs of the people and that the items taken from Paul’s body are not instrumental in the miracles. Luke does not go into specifics about how the handkerchiefs and aprons were used to bring healing and cast out evil sprits. That is not his point. Polhill states it best when he writes, “[T]he miracles wrought by the apostles are never presented as ends in themselves but always as opportunities, assistance to faith and commitment.” (Polhill, 1992, p. 402)

There were precedents in the history of the Jews showing that the power of the kingdom, even if it were waning, could be present on a body or on things used by kingdom people. When that power effected a miracle it was to be regarded as a sign. In the unusual happening witnesses are presented authentication of a ministry, indication of the authority that had been given to a person by the Lord, and confirmation of claims.

It won’t be long before someone will see the power of the kingdom and, although they do not know the King, will attempt to acquire and use His resources for their own endeavors. Having shown his reader the real ministry of Paul, the author goes on to show us folly of fooling around with the name of Jesus and finding out that the spiritual forces of darkness know the difference between Jesus’ disciples and charlatans.

      ¹³ Then some of the itinerant Jewish exorcists took it upon themselves to call the name of the Lord Jesus over those who had evil spirits, saying, “We exorcise you by the Jesus whom Paul preaches.” ¹⁴ Also there were seven sons of Sceva, a Jewish chief priest, who did so. ¹⁵ And the evil spirit answered and said, “Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are you?” ¹⁶ Then the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, overpowered them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded.

The Difference on Display (Acts 19:13-16; Supporting Passages)

Acts 19:13 – Exorcisms were not exclusive to the Christian community. Before the church was birthed, the Jewish community already had people who practiced exorcism. Jesus acknowledged their activity when defending His own casting out of demons (Matthew 12:27; Luke 11:19). Against the background of God’s extraordinary works through Paul, Luke introduces itinerant Jewish exorcists (περιερχομένων Ἰουδαίων ἐξορκιστῶν, perierchoménon Ioudéon exorkistón) who attempted to invoke the name of the Lord Jesus over those who had evil spirits. They were attempting to get the same results.

Two connected features stand out in their wording. First, they invoke “the Jesus” (τὸν Ἰησοῦν, ton Iisoún), identifying the particular person whose authority they hope to employ. Second, they specify “whom Paul preaches” (ὃν ὁ Παῦλος κηρύσσει, on o Pávlos kiríssi). They identify Jesus by another man’s proclamation. In the second feature of their exorcism language, they reveal that knowledge of this Jesus is being presented by Paul… not themselves; they themselves do not know or preach Him. Correct wording is their concern because they are really spell casting.

They thought that success turned on the correct use of the magical formula. (Robertson, 1933, Acts 19:13)

If God is doing a work through you, it will not be long before people will try to do that same work using your words, using conventions of your ministry, and using what they view as essential elements of your effectiveness. They are watching with the goal of getting insight on how to imitate what the Lord is doing through you. For example, if you are achieving results and using the phrase “in Jesus name,” people who want to achieve the same results will begin using those words and His name as a way of making their own ministry manifest the same outcomes.

Acts 19:14 – After describing the rise of copycats among the itinerant Jewish exorcists, Luke turns to a particular case: seven brothers who did so (τοῦτο ποιοῦντες, touto poiountes)—that is, they attempted to invoke Jesus’ name over those afflicted by evil spirits. These seven sons of Sceva stand out for two reasons: (1) their father’s identification as a Jewish chief priest (Ἰουδαίου ἀρχιερέως, Ioudaiou archiereōs) and (2) the humiliating outcome of their efforts. Through their failed attempt to use Jesus’ name, God would magnify that name and move believers who still practiced magic to renounce it.

Ephesus was a city known for its pervasive practice of the occult. The Jews that performed exorcisms were held in great by the witchcraft community. The occult subculture now contained pagans, those practicing Judaism, and Jesus followers. The magic practitioners from each of these subcommunities would have watched with great interest the efforts of the seven sons of Sceva.

Among practitioners of magic in ancient times Jews enjoyed high respect, for they were believed to have exceptionally effective spells at their command. (Bruce, 1988, p. 368)⁶

Acts 19:15 – The evil spirit (τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ πονηρόν, to pnévma to ponirón) answered (ἀποκριθέν, apokrithén) their incantation. Absent from Luke’s record are the distress and pleading seen when demons confronted Christ. There is no mention of crying out against torment and begging not to be sent into the abyss (Mark 5:7–12; Luke 8:28–31). Here the response reads as a composed challenge to the authority of those who took it upon themselves (ἐπεχείρησαν, epechírisan, “attempted” or “undertook”) to drive out the evil presence.

Here we must slow down. The translation of the underlying Greek into English has lost some of its fidelity in the NKJV. Two different words used by the evil spirit are translated as know.

With these two definitions in mind we can revisit and unpack what the evil spirit says:

Jesus know (τὸν Ἰησοῦν γινώσκω, ton Iisoún ginósko) or I am familiar with Jesus through experience, and Paul I know (καὶ τὸν Παῦλον ἐπίσταμαι, ke ton Pávlon epístame) or I have acquired intel about this man; but who are you?

The demon says that he is familiar with Jesus through experience (Mark 1:23-24; Luke 4:33-34; Mark 1:34; Luke 4:41) and has information about Paul (Acts 16:16-18). The same demon indicates ignorance of seven sons of Sceva.” In other words, “Tell me who you are because, I have no prior experience or intel or you. We have been briefed on Paul, the Power in him, and his relationship with Jesus. If we see Paul, Paul’s sweat cloth, or Paul’s apron, we know to just leave.”

Acts 19:16 – The demon was not going to depart. In fact, knowing that there was no power and no reason to be afraid, he used the person he possess to abuse the seven sons of Sceva. This was a terrible outcome.

With the extreme sense of modesty characteristic of Judaism, the nakedness of the Jewish exorcists was almost symbolic of their total humiliation in the incident. (Polhill, 1992, p. 404)

Two lessons emerges from the story. First, Christianity is not to be confused or conflated with magic. There will be no mixing of the ministry with the occult. The program of Jesus stands in opposition to unapproved approaches to interact with the spiritual realm. Second, the name of Jesus is no magical incantation that can be used to make things happen. If the person using the name does not know the Lord, they are trying to get results without having relationship or power. 

     ¹⁷ This became known both to all Jews and Greeks dwelling in Ephesus; and fear fell on them all, and the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified. ¹⁸ And many who had believed came confessing and telling their deeds. ¹⁹ Also, many of those who had practiced magic brought their books together and burned them in the sight of all. And they counted up the value of them, and it totaled fifty thousand pieces of silver. ²⁰ So the word of the Lord grew mightily and prevailed.

Section Title (Acts 19:17-20; Supporting Passages)

Acts 19:17 – The outcome of the failed attempt to cast out the demon became known to all Jews and Greeks; a city immersed in the occult heard that an evil spirit could not be evicted by well-connected Jewish exorcist that used the name of Jesus. What came of that is the important thing. Jesus name was magnified (ἐμεγαλύνετο, emegalíneto). When the word name is used here it is more than the proper noun that was used to refer to the Christ. The name is the person of Christ, the program of Christ, and the message preached about Christ. All of it together was made to be held in high esteem. Even the demon’s testimony gave credence to the claims that Jesus is the Christ and Son of God and that Paul had been sent to proclaim his message of salvation. The word translated magnified means to exalt, glorify, or speak highly of. In the end both Jews and Greeks in Ephesus were glorifying and exalting Jesus.

Acts 19:18-19 – Look now at the effect on the Jesus follower community. Within the church or among the many who had believed there were people practicing witchcraft and using the occult to achieve their goals. They came forward admitting their faults or confessing and telling what they had been doing. The came (ἠρχοντο, ērchonto) of verse Acts 19:18 is in the imperfect; this is an ongoing activity that was occurring over a period of time.

Came (ἠρχοντο [ērchonto]). Imperfect middle, kept coming, one after another. Even some of the believers were secretly under the spell of these false spiritualists just as some Christians today cherish private contacts with so-called occult powers through mediums, seances, of which they are ashamed. (Robertson, 1933, Acts 19:18)

The preaching of Paul had no doubt already (1) declared that Jesus is the only way of salvation and (2) denounced the practice of magic. However, it went unheeded until the seven sons of Sceva were stripped and wounded. In the end everyone saw the truth of what the apostle had been saying. So convincing was the preaching pared with the abject failure of the intinerant Jewish exorcists that those who were dabbling in demonic activities abandoned it all together. By burning their books they declared three things about the occult:

When the means for ungodliness are eliminated the person is serious about not sinning. By burning the books they eliminated the tools of their evil endeavors. This is true repentance. What sins am I saying that I am forsaking but keeping the equipment, the software, the relationship used to commit that sin?

This was a while in coming and did not take place over night. It was the work of God to get the people there and a process for them to participate in purifying their lives.

The verb translated burned is the imperfect active of κατακαιω [katakaiō]. It took a good while to burn them completely (up, we say; down, the Greeks say, perfective use of κατα [kata]). These Magical Papyri or slips of parchment with symbols or magical sentences written on them called Ἐφεσια Γραμματα [Ephesia Grammata] (Ephesian Letters). These Ephesian Letters were worn as amulets or charms. (Robertson, 1933, Acts 19:19)

But why did it take so long? Sanctification is not immediate:

Magic was part of Ephesian culture. Nor should one question the integrity of these Ephesian Christians who only now openly forsook such ways. Salvation involves a process of growth, of increasing sanctification. And after all, the Ephesian spells were not that remote from the horoscopes and board games that supposedly communicate telepathic messages with which many Christians dabble in our own day. (Polhill, 1992, p. 405)

Acts 19:20 — The So (οὕτως, houtōs) that opens this verse can also be translated “thus” or “in this way.” The verbs grew (ηὔξανεν, ēuxanen) and prevailed (ἴσχυεν, ischyen) are both in the imperfect. They are portraying ongoing past activity. The same verse could be translated “So the word of the Lord Jesus was growing and was gaining strength.” Luke describes the Lord’s message spreading and demonstrating its power. In this context, that power is evident in changed lives.

Although “all those who dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus” (Acts 19:10), some who believed continued practicing magic (Acts 19:18). The message had reached their ears, but its implications were not yet governing certain area of their lives. In this way points back to the events through which God brought further change. Through the extraordinary miracles, the humiliation of the self-appointed exorcists, and the resulting fear and confession, the Lord exposed the incompatibility of magic with the Way. Jesus’ name was magnified, and believers demonstrated their repentance by destroying the tools of their former practices. The word they had heard was visibly overcoming and destroying the works of the devil (1 John 3:8). “It was a day of triumph for Christ in Ephesus, this city of vast wealth and superstition” (Robertson, 1933, Acts 19:20).

Conclusion

What are we to do with these things. Prayerfully consider the questions and action items in the table below. May God be at work prevailing in your life as you seek His counsel in prayer at the word of the Lord Jesus.

Table 3: Takeaways: Key Questions and Action Items

Key Question	Action Item
Acts 19:11–12 Am I obeying the teaching of Paul as Christ’s authenticated messenger?	Read a passage from one of Paul’s letters this week. Identify an instruction you have resisted and take one specific step to obey it.
Acts 19:13–16 Am I depending on Jesus Himself, or seeking spiritual results through formulas and occult practices?	Examine how you pray and seek help. Confess any misuse of Jesus’ name or involvement in occult practices, and seek support from a mature believer to follow Christ faithfully.
Acts 19:17, 20 How can my words and conduct magnify Jesus and help His Word advance?	Give Christ the credit when discussing answered prayer or ministry. Share one specific way His Word is changing your life with someone who needs encouragement to trust Him.
Acts 19:18–19 What sin must I confess, and what means of returning to it must I remove?	Confess the practice to God and seek accountability from a trusted believer. Remove the materials or access that enable it, accepting the cost; dispose of occult materials rather than passing them to others.

Endnotes

¹ Paul’s activities in the city of Ephesus were broad and far reaching. The table below provides those that are known and some that are supposed.

² The glory seen in Moses face was passing away (2 Corinthians 3:7, 13). Whether passing away means (a) diminishing over time as Moses was away from the meetings with God or (b) that the ministry of Moses was temporary, we should see the point: it authenticated him as a man of God and implied his authority. I personally believe this is what happens for every Christian that meets with God; in Moses case they were allowed to see a diminishing glory as a means for declaring him as designated by God to be heard and obeyed.

³ Some will point to the fact that Jesus told the woman that her faith had made her well. So was it the power in the hem or the Power in Him that fixed the flow? Either question misses the point. What point? Jesus was authenticated by the outcome. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer sad, the question is not how. God can use any how. The miracle says that the question to be asked is “Who is this?” (Bonhoeffer, 1966).

⁴ In the healings associated with Peter’s ministry, including the expectation surrounding his passing shadow, the authenticity of the message and the minister were confirmed (Acts 5:12–16; compare Acts 4:29–30; 14:3).

⁵ Stephen’s angelic countenance recalls the shining face of Moses (Acts 6:15; Exodus 34:29–35). This resemblance suggests divine authentication. Like Moses, Stephen lived in fellowship with God, as indicated by his fullness of the Holy Spirit and his vision of God’s glory (Acts 6:5, 8–10; 7:55–56), and brought God’s message to His people (Acts 6:10; 7:2–53). The connection with Moses is my own interpretive inference from Luke’s description.

⁶ Several magical papyri which have survived from those days to ours contain attempts to reproduce the true pronunciation of the ineffable name—Iaō, Iabe, Iaoue, and so forth—as well as other Jewish expressions and names such as Sabaoth and Abraham, used as elements in magic spells. The Jewish high priest was the one man who was authorized to pronounce the otherwise ineffable name; this he did once a year, in the course of the service prescribed for the day of atonement.

⁷ According to magical theory, the potency of a spell is bound up with its secrecy; if it be divulged, it becomes ineffective. So these converted magicians renounced their imagined power by rendering their spells inoperative.

References

Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000). In A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Bonhoeffer, D. (1966). Christ the center (J. Bowden, Trans.). Harper & Row.

Bruce, F. F. (1988). The Book of the Acts. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26). Broadman & Holman Publishers.

Robertson, A. T. (1933). Word Pictures in the New Testament. Broadman Press.

Toussaint, S. D. (1985). Acts. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures (Vol. 2). Victor Books.

Prepare your household. Help your neighbor.

What would your household need if the power went out tonight and stayed out for several days? Cybersecurity terrorism, severe weather, and other emergencies can interrupt the services we depend on. A little preparation now can help us respond calmly, care for those entrusted to us, and be available to help others.

For followers of Jesus, preparation can be an expression of stewardship and love of neighbors. Proverbs 21:20 commends wise provision, and Galatians 6:10 calls us to do good to others. This guide offers a manageable place to begin: understand your needs, build useful supplies within your budget, and make a plan you can actually follow. Read what follows and prayerfully consider how your household can prepare for emergencies and help others if those times come.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

Some of my Christian brethren are irritated with me speaking out a word of caution concerning Halloween. A few have even voiced the belief that it does not matter. To my beloved, how many wiccan’s are celebrating Easter with you. We use Easter to promote something. Why are you so against seeing that they are doing the same thing under the cover of a cultural practice. Just sayin’. Many Wiccans observe Samhain around October 31 as a religious festival involving ancestors, the dead, divination (witchcraft), and seasonal renewal.

The following examples come from Wiccans and Satanist documents.

Can you attend a Halloween celebration? The real question is: Why are you there, and what are you doing? Are you among the people on mission, as Jesus was, or are you participating in and endorsing works He came to destroy (1 John 3:8)?

Avoiding all association with people who practice sin would require leaving the world (1 Corinthians 5:9–10). Our lights are not to be hidden or kept entirely away from the darkness. And we must stay away from judging those outside the church; Someone qualified has that job already (1 Corinthians 5:12–13). Yet being present among unbelievers cannot become participation or promotion of prohibited practices (Deuteronomy 18). We are called to reach people while refusing fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness (Ephesians 5:11). Let’s go love on some people. But celebrating in the way of the world is taking it to far.

In His grip by His grace,
That Guy

References — APA 7

Church of Satan. (n.d.). F.A.Q. holidays. https://churchofsatan.com/faq-holidays/

Fox, S. (n.d.). Guide to celebrating Samhain. Circle Sanctuary. https://www.circlesanctuary.org/teachings/Samhain-Lore-and-Rituals

Kardia. (2021, October 27). How do Wiccans celebrate Samhain? Living Wicca Today. https://wicca.com/livingwiccatoday/how-do-wiccans-celebrate-samhain/

The Poisson distribution answers this question: Given an average rate, what is the probability that an event will occur a specified number of times within a defined interval?

Notice the word probability. The distribution does not tell us what must happen next. It tells us how likely different counts are under a particular model. An average of three arrivals per day does not mean exactly three people will arrive tomorrow. There might be none, three, or more than five. The Poisson distribution assigns a probability to each possible count.

That distinction matters when circumstances are difficult. Will a shelter receive more people than its reserve water can support? Will equipment failures exhaust a rescue team’s spare parts? Will a ship pass close enough to offer a stranded crew a chance to signal for help? These are questions about uncertainty—and the probabilities can help us prepare. Here are five reasons the Poisson distribution deserves a place in our mathematical toolbox.

The Formula: A Probability for Each Possible Count

P(X = k) = (λ^ke^−λ) / k!

X is the number of occurrences in the interval. (Note: An interval could be in space, time, or some other dimension.) k is the specific count whose probability we want: 0, 1, 2, and so on. λ (lambda) is the average number of occurrences within the specific interval being studied. It is an average count—not a probability and not necessarily the count observed in one interval. e is approximately 2.71828, and k! means k factorial; for example, 3! = 3 × 2 × 1 = 6, while 0! = 1.

λ = Average Rate × Size of the Interval.

The time units must match. If ships pass at an average rate of one every six hours, then λ = (1/6 ship per hour) × 12 hours = 2 ships for the twelve-hour interval. For six hours, λ would be 1; for twenty-four hours, it would be 4. Lambda changes with the interval, even when the underlying rate stays the same.

Where X is the number of occurrences of an event, the Poisson formula calculates the probability of X will happen that many times. When you use the formula to get the probability for each possible value of X, the set of values returned is the Poisson Distribution for range of values valid for X. That is, for a fixed λ (average), the probabilities assigned to X = 0, 1, 2, … form the Poisson distribution. Calculating them for a selected range of X values displays that portion of the distribution.

For the time-based examples below, assume occurrences are independent and the average rate remains constant, with a negligible chance of multiple occurrences in a sufficiently short interval. These are hypothetical examples. Real emergencies can involve clustering, changing conditions, or connected failures that make a simple Poisson model unsuitable.

Reason 1: The Poisson Distribution Turns an Average into Useful Probabilities

An average gives us a starting point. The distribution lets us ask how likely a particular count is. Suppose a shelter receives an average of three unexpected arrivals per day. What is the probability of exactly five arrivals tomorrow? Interval: one day. λ = 3, the average number of arrivals within that one-day interval. The five arrivals in our question are the possible outcome k = 5; they are not lambda.

P(X = 5) = (3⁵e⁻³) / 5! = (243 × e⁻³) / 120 ≈ 0.100819

The probability is approximately 10.08%. That does not predict that five people will arrive. It means that, across many comparable days governed by this model, about 10 out of every 100 days would have exactly five arrivals.

Reason 2: The Poisson Distribution Helps Us Estimate the Risk of Running Short

Now suppose the shelter’s reserve water covers the next day’s needs of five additional people. The important question changes: What is the probability of more than five arrivals? Exactly five arrivals would use the reserve’s capacity; six or more would exceed it.

Parameters: X = tomorrow’s unexpected arrivals; interval = one day; λ = 3, the average count of arrivals within one day; reserve capacity = 5 people. We want P(X > 5).

Formula: P(X > 5) = 1 − P(X ≤ 5). Add the probabilities of zero through five arrivals, then subtract their sum from one.

P(X > 5) = 1 − e⁻³[1 + 3 + 3²/2! + 3³/3! + 3⁴/4! + 3⁵/5!]

= 1 − 0.916082 ≈ 0.083918 = 8.39%

There is approximately an 8.39% chance that tomorrow’s arrivals exceed the reserve water’s capacity. This gives planners a numerical description of one risk. Whether that risk is acceptable depends on the consequences of a shortage and the options for obtaining more water.

Reason 3: The Poisson Distribution Helps Us Evaluate Equipment Reliability

During a prolonged power outage, a rescue team’s radio system experiences an average of two failures per week. Each failure consumes one repair kit, and the team has three kits. What is the probability that failures exceed the available kits next week?

Parameters: X = failures next week; interval = one week; λ = 2, the average count of failures within one week; repair capacity = 3 failures. We want P(X > 3).

Formula: P(X > 3) = 1 − P(X ≤ 3). Subtract the combined probabilities of zero, one, two, and three failures from one.

P(X > 3) = 1 − e⁻²[1 + 2 + 2²/2! + 2³/3!]

= 1 − 0.857123 ≈ 0.142877 = 14.29%

Under this model, there is approximately a 14.29% chance of needing more than three repair kits. Over many comparable weeks, that is roughly one week in seven. This calculation addresses the chance of exhausting repair capacity; it does not calculate repair time or guarantee uninterrupted radio service.

Reason 4: The Poisson Distribution Measures the Probability of an Opportunity

A stranded crew can signal ships that pass within range. Ships enter that range at an average rate of one every six hours. What is the probability that at least one ship enters range during the next twelve hours?

Parameters: X = ships entering range in twelve hours; rate = 1/6 ship per hour; interval = 12 hours. λ = (1/6 ship per hour) × 12 hours = 2 ships, the average count within the twelve-hour interval. Lambda is 2 here, rather than 1, because the question covers twelve hours, not six. We want P(X ≥ 1).

Formula: P(X ≥ 1) = 1 − P(X = 0). The only alternative to at least one ship is no ships.

P(X ≥ 1) = 1 − (2⁰e⁻²)/0! = 1 − e⁻²

≈ 1 − 0.135335 = 0.864665 = 86.47%

There is approximately an 86.47% chance that at least one ship enters signal range within twelve hours. There is also a 13.53% chance that none does. A passing ship creates an opportunity to signal; it does not guarantee that anyone sees the signal or can rescue the crew.

Reason 5: The Poisson Distribution Helps Us Recognize Unusual Network Activity

Suppose a company’s remote-access gateway normally records an average of one failed login every ten minutes during comparable periods. A security analyst observes four failed logins in ten minutes. How unusual is a count this high under normal conditions? For this hypothetical example, assume failed logins occur independently at a constant average rate. Parameters: X = failed logins in ten minutes; interval = ten minutes; λ = 1, the average count of failed logins within ten minutes; observed count = 4. The observed count of four is compared with the baseline average count of one; it does not replace lambda. We want P(X ≥ 4), the probability of four or more failed logins—not merely exactly four.

Formula: P(X ≥ 4) = 1 − P(X ≤ 3).
Substitution: P(X ≥ 4) = 1 − e⁻¹[1 + 1 + 1²/2! + 1³/3!].
Calculated outcome: P(X ≥ 4) = 1 − 0.981012 ≈ 0.018988 = 1.90%.

Interpretation: Under the assumed normal-activity model, a ten-minute period has about a 1.90% chance of containing four or more failed logins. Such a count could prompt an analyst to examine the accounts, source addresses, and timing. It is not a 98.10% probability of an attack: a rare count under one model does not establish its cause. Legitimate users can mistype passwords, repeated attempts can be linked, and login rates can vary by time of day. Across 1,000 comparable periods, this model would predict about 19 periods meeting the threshold even without a change in the baseline. A Java simulation could demonstrate that distinction by comparing calculated probabilities with observed frequencies.

Conclusion

The power of the Poisson distribution is its ability to turn an expected count into probabilities for possible outcomes. It helps us distinguish exactly five, more than five, and at least one—questions that can lead to very different decisions.

In difficult circumstances, an average alone can leave us poorly prepared. A probability gives us a clearer view of the uncertainty we face. Its usefulness still depends on whether our assumptions and estimated rate fit the situation.

A small Java program can help make the point concrete: enter an average rate and an interval, choose a question about a count, calculate its probability, and compare the result with repeated simulations. The aim is to understand how likely an outcome is, so we can make better-informed decisions.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

References

Brain Station Advanced. (2026, May 15). Introduction to Poisson distribution [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNwxV8OfNE8

Central passage: Acts 19:1-10; Related Passages: Luke 17:20-21; Acts 1:3; Acts 28:23, 30-31

      ¹ And it happened, while Apollos was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper regions, came to Ephesus. And finding some disciples ² he said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” So they said to him, “We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.” ³ And he said to them, “Into what then were you baptized?” So they said, “Into John’s baptism.” ⁴ Then Paul said, “John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.”

     ⁵ When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. ⁶ And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied. ⁷ Now the men were about twelve in all.

     ⁸ And he went into the synagogue and spoke boldly for three months, reasoning and persuading concerning the things of the kingdom of God. ⁹ But when some were hardened and did not believe, but spoke evil of the Way before the multitude, he departed from them and withdrew the disciples, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus. ¹⁰ And this continued for two years, so that all who dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks.

Introduction

Getting The People from John to Jesus (Acts 19:1-4)

While Luke does not identify the catalyst for Paul’s question, the question itself suggests that he was probing something he considered important: Had these disciples received the Holy Spirit when they believed? (And what was it that prompted him to ask this question. Did the apostle notice missing marks of the kingdom?) He is asking about the earnest of our inheritance—the down payment guaranteeing what is to come—and the power for witness (Ephesians 1:13–14; Acts 1:8). Through the Spirit, the kingdom proclaimed as “at hand” (Matthew 3:1-2; Matthew 4:17; Mark 1:14-15) becomes a reality personally experienced and in hand (Romans 14:17). Rebirth and renewal, God’s love poured into our hearts, and a life characterized by righteousness, peace, and joy are all features of the kingdom brought through the Spirit (Titus 3:5; Romans 5:5; 14:17).

The reply of the disciples exposes a shortcoming in their understanding and experience. (In his prior work for Theophilus Luke has used the disciples (GK, TL) for followers of John the Baptist. See Luke 5:33 and 7:18f.) Paul addresses this deficiency by directing them to the point of John’s preaching and the mission of John’s ministry (VR). In fact, John’s focus was in getting his hearers to believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus (). John himself had proclaimed that the Coming One would baptize with the Holy Spirit (Mark 1:7–8). At Pentecost, the risen and exalted Jesus (aka the one who would come after John the Baptist) poured out that promised Holy Spirit (Acts 2:32–33). The kingdom that had been at hand in the Spirit-filled life of Jesus was now among men filled with His same Holy Spirit.

But what happened with these disciples? These particular John-followers appear not to have heard that the promise had been fulfilled: We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit. In light of John’s ministry and message, they cannot be saying that they did not know about the baptism of the Holy Spirit by Messiah (Luke 3:16); they meant they had not heard about the fulfillment — the outpouring at Pentecost. They knew only of John’s preparation preaching through a baptism of repentance. Paul now points them to the One for whom John had prepared them:

Paul’s statement in v. 4 is the critical point. John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance, preparatory to the coming of the Messiah. John’s entire role as forerunner was to prepare the people for the Messiah’s coming. The Messiah had indeed come, and he is Jesus. Thus, to be a true disciple of John was to confess Jesus, for he is the one whom John had heralded. (Polhill, 1992, p. 399)

In this light, although this disciples have repented. The kingdom has not come for them; there remains a work to be done in their lives by Christ. And we do well to remember this when preaching.

A ministry that promotes repentance is good. But by itself misses the mark and is impoverished. The repentance required by God is not merely a turning from sin; there must be a turning to the Savior. In response to our decision to transfer the treasure of trust to Christ, God makes a deposit, a down payment – The Holy Spirit. The abundant life promoted by the Christian is not a human effort to abandon sin but the application of a new nature.

Peter and Paul — Parallels and Proof of Authority (Acts 19:5-7)

The disciples of John the Baptist, upon hearing this, are baptized in the name of Jesus. But why? We would say that they have already been baptized. That shows our tendency to conflate the preparatory baptism of the forerunner with the Christian rite of baptism. It uncovers our theology: we make repentance redemption. They are not the same. The difference is Christ. If they were the same Paul would have merely laid hands on them. But, because they have believed on Jesus and been baptized in Jesus’ name, he obeys the commandment of Christ and baptizes them again.

The disciples made a decision to follow Jesus and publicly declared that decision with a water baptism that was an outward confirmation of a inner decision to receive Christ (VR: Ethiopian eunique; Philippian Jailer and his household; Cornelius’ and his household). But they did not receive the Holy Spirit yet. Paul would have to intervene and thereby be validated for his role in their lives and ours:

⁶ And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.

The laying on of Paul’s hands in order to receive the Holy Spirit is not going to be the norm. But it parallels an event that was used to indicate Peter’s unique position among leaders in the church. The big fisherman was set apart among the apostles; he alone was given an authority to release and bind (VR). Luke shows Paul to be among the Gentiles what Peter has been among the Jews and among people in general (Acts 10).

This was done to ensure that the disciples would regard Paul as having authority and that the promise had been kept. If they had received the Spirit without any heavenly fanfare, they may have questioned what changed or why they should listen to Paul. By doing it this way Jesus directed the disciples to head the teachings of Paul going forward. Luke takes great pains to make the reader see the similarities between Peter and Paul with the goal of showing that their words are to be received and obeyed:

	Peter	Paul
Heal lame men	Acts 3:2–8	Acts 14:8–10
Cast out demons	Acts 5:16	Acts 16:18
Confront sorcerers	Acts 8:18–24	Acts 13:6–11
Raise the dead	Acts 9:36–41	Acts 20:9–12
Experience miraculous escapes from prison	Acts 12:7–11	Acts 16:25–26
Lay Hands and the Spirit is Received	Acts 8:14–17	Acts 19:5-7

Table 1: Parallels between Peter and Paul (adapted from Bruce, 1988, pp. 367–368)

What is the rule, then, about the reception of the Holy Spirit in the book of Acts? The truth is that apart from the reception of the Holy Spirit a person does not belong to Christ and is not saved. However, there is no one way that it takes place in Luke’s record:

It should also be noted that the reception of the Holy Spirit in Acts does not follow any set pattern. He came into believers before baptism (Acts 10:44), at the time of or after baptism (8:12–16; 19:6), and by the laying on of apostolic hands (8:17; 19:6). Yet Paul declared (Rom. 8:9) that anyone without the Holy Spirit is not a Christian. (Toussaint, 1985, p. 409)

Twice, though, the Holy Spirit is given by Christ only after there was a laying on of apostolic hands (Acts 8:17; 19:6). These cases were used to ensure that the recipients had a right regard for the authority of the apostles and their teaching. In other cases (a) the apostles are not present (VR: Ethiopian) or (b) an apostle is present but there is no laying on of hands (Acts 10:44). Let us get from this the message that Jesus surely meant to send to the disciples:

Paul, like the apostles before him, has been given special authority in the church (Galatians 1:1; 2 Corinthians 10:8). His writings are to be regarded as Scripture and as carrying the authority of the Lord’s commands (2 Peter 3:15–16; 1 Corinthians 14:37; 2 Thessalonians 2:15; 3:14). He received the gospel through the revelation of Jesus Christ and instruction concerning the Lord’s Supper from the Lord Himself (Galatians 1:11–12; 1 Corinthians 11:23–26). Jesus confirmed Paul’s authority when the Holy Spirit came upon the disciples after Paul laid hands on them (Acts 19:6). Jesus says concerning His kingdom, “Listen to Paul!”. 

The Kingdom Explained and Seen (Acts 19:8-10)  

From the earliest times in Israel, God was acknowledged as king (cf. Ex. 15:18). His kingship is universal (Ps. 103:19), but is manifested most clearly where men and women recognize it in practice by doing his will. (Bruce, 1988, p. 32)

With the fall of the monarchy and the end of national independence, there arose a new conception of the kingdom of God as destined to be revealed on earth in its fullness at a later date (cf. Dan. 2:44; 7:13–14). It is in the light of this later conception that we should understand the New Testament teaching about the kingdom of God. (Bruce, 1988, p. 32)

Jesus inaugurates the kingdom: it “drew near” with the inception of his public ministry (cf. Mark 1:14–15) and was released in power by his death and exaltation (cf. Mark 9:1). (Bruce, 1988, p. 32)

The things relating to the kingdom of God which form the theme of his postresurrection teaching at the beginning of Acts are identical with “the things relating to the Lord Jesus Christ” which form the theme of Paul’s teaching in Rome at the end of the book (28:31). (Bruce, 1988, p. 32)

At Christ’s first coming the age to come invaded this present age; at his coming in glory the age to come will have altogether superseded this present age. Between the two comings the two ages overlap; the people of Christ live temporally in this present age while spiritually they belong to the heavenly kingdom and enjoy by anticipation the life of the age to come. (Bruce, 1988, p. 33)

The topic of his discussion was the kingdom of God which obviously included the person and work of Christ but also must have anticipated His millennial reign (cf. 1:3, 6). (Toussaint, 1985, p. 410)

The kingdom of God does not come with observation; it is in us. Though us it has become at hand to those that are being presented Christ. In us the kingdom is being experienced as we, in the power of the Spirit, bear the fruits of righteousness, joy, and peace in the midst of a crooked and perverse generations.  

Do not merely look for the kingdom; live under the King. Jesus said His kingdom does not come with observation. Through His Spirit, let His rule shape your life in righteousness, peace, and joy, and keep making Him known to others (Luke 17:20–21; Romans 14:17; Acts 19:8–10).

Conclusion  

Takeaways: Key Questions and Action Items

Key Question	Action Item
Acts 19:1–4: Am I trusting Jesus to save me, or am I only trying to stop doing wrong?	Tell Jesus that you are trusting Him to save you. Ask the Holy Spirit to help you obey Him, and explain to someone why following Jesus means more than trying to be good.
Acts 19:5–7: Do I listen to what Jesus teaches through Paul and put it into practice?	Read one of Paul’s instructions in Ephesians 4:25–32. Choose one way to obey it today, such as speaking truthfully, forgiving someone, or using words that help others.
Acts 19:8–10; Luke 17:20–21: Can people see that Jesus is my King in the way I live, and do I keep telling others about Him?	Ask the Holy Spirit to help you show kindness, do what is right, and make peace at home, school, or work. Tell one person about Jesus this week, even if an earlier conversation was difficult.

Table 2: Takeaways

References

Bruce, F. F. (1988). The Book of the Acts. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26). Broadman & Holman Publishers.

Toussaint, S. D. (1985). Acts. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures (Vol. 2). Victor Books.

The realization that he had been healed moved the foreigner (Luke 17:15). He interrupted his journey to show himself to the priest in order to show himself grateful to the One who would serve as our great High Priest (Hebrews 4:14–16; 5:5–10). At some point en route, this Samaritan recognized that his body had been healed. What did he notice? Luke does not tell us. But we can consider possibilities while acknowledging what the passage leaves unsaid:

• Fullness — We do not know how long he had suffered or what damage his condition had caused. Hansen’s disease, one condition associated with the modern term leprosy, can damage nerves, impair vision, and lead to injuries and tissue loss. Luke does not establish this particular diagnosis or describe missing fingers, toes, or eyesight. Nevertheless, we may wonder: Did the man notice a change in his skin? Did movement become easier? Was something visibly restored? Whatever the evidence, he recognized that he had been healed.
• Feeling — Hansen’s disease can also cause a loss of sensation. Perhaps this man noticed that his hands could feel again. That possibility is an illustration, not a detail supplied by Luke. The certainty is that Jesus had changed his condition, and he knew it.

Whatever it was that he saw—ἰδών (idōn), “having seen” or “when he saw”—he recognized that he had been healed. His healing was not an isolated event. The others had been cleansed as well. Yet Jesus’ questions reveal that only this foreigner returned to give glory to God (Luke 17:17–18). Someone might defend the nine by pointing to Jesus’ command: “Go, show yourselves to the priests” (Luke 17:14). But the Lord’s response makes clear that obedience to that instruction did not make gratitude unnecessary. The Samaritan recognized that the One who had helped him deserved his worship and thanksgiving.

When did you realize that the Lord had answered your prayer? What has changed since Christ began His work in you? Where have you seen His forgiveness, His provision, or His power breaking sin’s hold? And what should it look like when you recognize His handiwork in your own life?

The questions and commentary of Jesus reveal the heart of the Father. Jesus said that whoever has seen Him has seen the Father (John 14:9). In the assessment of the Son, we see the Father’s desire for worshipers who worship in spirit and truth (John 4:23–24). We are reminded of David, who danced before the Lord with all his might and refused to let concern for his royal dignity silence his rejoicing (2 Samuel 6:14, 20–22).

What, then, should we do when we recognize the Lord’s mercy?

• Go Back (Luke 17:15) — Turn your attention from the gift to the One who graciously gave it. Make time to draw near to Jesus and acknowledge His help.
• Glorify Openly (Luke 17:15) — Let your words make God’s goodness known to those around you. Be ready to testify about what He has done in your life. Your testimony can encourage others to seek Him. Those who come to God must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who diligently seek Him (Hebrews 11:6).
• Get Low (Luke 17:16) — Humble yourself before Jesus, remembering that His mercy—not your merit—has helped you. Let your posture and your choices express your dependence on Him.
• Give Thanks (Luke 17:16) — Name what He has done and personally thank Him for it. Do not let His kindness become so familiar that it goes unacknowledged.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

     ¹⁸ So Paul still remained a good while. Then he took leave of the brethren and sailed for Syria, and Priscilla and Aquila were with him. He had his hair cut off at Cenchrea, for he had taken a vow. ¹⁹ And he came to Ephesus, and left them there; but he himself entered the synagogue and reasoned with the Jews. ²⁰ When they asked him to stay a longer time with them, he did not consent, ²¹ but took leave of them, saying, “I must by all means keep this coming feast in Jerusalem; but I will return again to you, God willing.” And he sailed from Ephesus.

     ²² And when he had landed at Caesarea, and gone up and greeted the church, he went down to Antioch. ²³ After he had spent some time there, he departed and went over the region of Galatia and Phrygia in order, strengthening all the disciples.

     ²⁴ Now a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man and mighty in the Scriptures, came to Ephesus. ²⁵ This man had been instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in spirit, he spoke and taught accurately the things of the Lord, though he knew only the baptism of John. ²⁶ So he began to speak boldly in the synagogue. When Aquila and Priscilla heard him, they took him aside and explained to him the way of God more accurately. ²⁷ And when he desired to cross to Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him; and when he arrived, he greatly helped those who had believed through grace; ²⁸ for he vigorously refuted the Jews publicly, showing from the Scriptures that Jesus is the Christ.

Headed Home (Acts 18:18-21) —

• Priscilla is listed before Aquila in Acts 18:18. If we use the Nestle Aland United Bible Society (NU) text, she is also listed first in Acts 18:26. The Textus Receptus, a sixteenth-century printed Greek text based primarily on a relatively limited group of later Byzantine manuscripts, has Aquila listed first. Luke says, in effect, the wife and husband accompanied Paul. Later in Acts 18:26, if we use NU as a basis for translation (NIV, NASB, NLT, CSB, HCSB, ESV, NRSVue, LEB, NIrV), he says that the wife and husband heard the preaching of Apollos and then took him aside to explain the way of God more accurately. NKJV and KJV read “Aquila and Priscilla.”
• The term brethren in Acts 18:18, as a way of referring to the people being left behind, indicates that some of the people in Corinth have become Christ followers; they are now regarded as family in Christ.
• In the text it says that Paul sailed for Syria. It took me a while to realize that Syria is the region that includes Antioch, Damascus, and Caesarea. By saying that Paul sailed for Syria, Luke is saying that the apostle is homebound.

• Cenchrea (or Cenchreae) was Corinth’s eastern seaport on the Saronic Gulf, in the Roman province of Achaia. Luke’s reference to Paul’s haircut functions as a parenthetical explanation: before sailing, Paul had his hair cut because he had taken a vow (Acts 18:18). The association between a vow and uncut hair recalls the Nazirite regulations of Numbers 6:1–21. However, the prescribed completion of the Nazirite vow involved offerings and shaving at the sanctuary (Numbers 6:13–20, especially verse 18). Paul’s cutting of his hair occurred at Cenchrea. While we should exercise caution in identifying the precise nature of his vow, in the context of the ministry in Corinth and in proximity to the earlier promises of the Lord, we may infer. Infer what? The Lord had promised Paul His presence and protection in Corinth (Acts 18:9–10); we may infer that Paul’s vow expressed gratitude for that assurance or a special dedication to the work entrusted to him. Its connection with his departure makes such a reading possible and even likely.

This was probably not a formal Nazirite vow, which could not properly be undertaken outside the Holy Land, but a private vow, the fulfilment of which was an act of thanksgiving—possibly for the divine promise of verse 10, which had been confirmed by his preservation from harm throughout his Corinthian ministry. (Bruce, 1988, p. 355)

• Paul is en route to Jerusalem; he is determined to keep the coming feast. On his way he stops in the city of Ephesus and goes into the synagogue. Paul’s stated principle was that the gospel is “for the Jew first and also for the Greek” (Romans 1:16). His missionary practice reflected that priority: upon entering a city, he ordinarily began by proclaiming Christ in the synagogue (Acts 13:5, 14–16, 46; 14:1; 17:1–2, 10, 17; 18:4). We see this pattern again in Acts 18:19, when he enters the synagogue at Ephesus and reasons with the Jews. But more than a principle is at work; there is a guiding Presence. The Holy Spirit directs Paul’s missionary work (Acts 16:6–10). The apostle is spiritual or Spirit-led. Christ lives in him (Romans 8:14; Galatians 2:20). Paul’s practice of going to the Jews first reflects the priority expressed in Jesus’ own ministry: “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:5–6; 15:24). He continues to press on that priority as He lives through Paul.
• The Apostle Paul Has Left the Building – The Jews of the synagogue asked Paul to stay; but he would not consent (Acts 18:20). He had to make it to the coming feast. The feast is unspecified; Paul could have been trying to get back to Jerusalem for Passover. Because the words “I must be all means keep this coming feast in Jerusalem” are absent from the NU text, the identity of the feast should not carry interpretive weight. What matters is that the apostle to the Gentiles has left Ephesus after only reaching out to the Jews. In the absence of this great man of God, how is the ministry going to work?

Return to Worship in Jerusalem, Report in Antioch, and then Back to Work (Acts 18:22-23) — Luke and the Gospel writers commonly describe travelers as going up to Jerusalem (Luke 2:42; 19:28; Acts 11:2; 15:2) and down from Jerusalem to other places (Luke 10:30; Acts 8:5; 15:30). This convention helps explain Luke’s compressed account in Acts 18:22: after landing at Caesarea, Paul went up and greeted the church, indicating a visit to the fellowship in Jerusalem. He then left Jerusalem and is described as having gone down to Antioch. At last, the apostle is back where he began his second missionary journey (Acts 15:35–41).

There was much to share about what had taken place. We can imagine that, in the midst of much teaching, he related the high points of the journey:

Location	Scripture	Paul’s Account
Antioch in Syria	Acts 15:36–41	I proposed revisiting the churches. After Barnabas and I disagreed over taking John Mark, I chose Silas and departed. We traveled through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.
Derbe and Lystra	Acts 16:1–5	I recruited Timothy to accompany us. As we traveled, we delivered the Jerusalem council’s decisions and strengthened the churches.
Troas	Acts 16:6–10	The Holy Spirit prevented us from preaching in Asia and entering Bithynia. At Troas, I received a vision of a Macedonian man asking for help. We concluded that God had called us to preach in Macedonia.
Samothrace and Neapolis	Acts 16:11–12	We sailed from Troas through Samothrace to Neapolis, then traveled inland to Philippi.
Philippi	Acts 16:13–40	We proclaimed the message, and Lydia believed and welcomed us into her home. I commanded a spirit of divination to leave an enslaved girl. Silas and I were beaten and imprisoned, but God opened the prison doors. The jailer and his household believed. After learning that we were Roman citizens, the magistrates came and asked us to leave.
Amphipolis and Apollonia	Acts 17:1	We passed through these cities on our way to Thessalonica.
Thessalonica	Acts 17:1–9	I reasoned from the Scriptures in the synagogue on three Sabbaths, explaining that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead. Some Jews and many Greeks believed, but our opponents attacked Jason’s house. The believers sent us away by night.
Berea	Acts 17:10–14	We entered the synagogue, where our hearers received the message eagerly and examined the Scriptures daily. Many believed. When opponents came from Thessalonica and stirred up trouble, the believers sent me away, while Silas and Timothy remained.
Athens	Acts 17:15–34	Distressed by the city’s idolatry, I reasoned in the synagogue and marketplace. I also addressed the Areopagus, proclaiming the Creator, calling for repentance, and declaring the resurrection. Some mocked, others wanted to hear more, and some believed.
Corinth	Acts 18:1–17	I worked with Aquila and Priscilla and reasoned in the synagogue. After opposition, I taught next door in the house of Justus. Crispus and many Corinthians believed. The Lord encouraged me to keep speaking, and I remained eighteen months teaching God’s word. When my opponents brought me before Gallio, he dismissed their accusation.
Cenchrea	Acts 18:18	I had my hair cut because of a vow. Accompanied by Priscilla and Aquila, I sailed toward Syria.
Ephesus	Acts 18:19–21	I entered the synagogue and reasoned with the Jews. Although they asked me to stay longer, I declined, promising to return if God willed. I departed, leaving Priscilla and Aquila there.
Caesarea	Acts 18:22	I landed at Caesarea and continued inland.
Jerusalem	Acts 18:22	I went up and greeted the church.
Antioch in Syria	Acts 18:22	I went down to Antioch, returning to the church from which I had departed on this journey.

Paul is an apostle (ἀπόστολος, apostolos) — one sent. He has been called to go. And so, after returning to Antioch and spending time with his sending church, he departs again. Where does he go? Through the regions of Galatia and Phrygia, strengthening (ἐπιστηρίζων, epistērizōn) all the disciples (Acts 18:23), including those in churches established during his first missionary journey.

Paul goes back to the people that have heard and believed, to churches that were previously planted, and to saints he has not seen in a while. His ministry is more than decisions and baptisms. He is engaged in the larger and longsuffering work of leading people to faith, helping them hold on to their commitment, and promoting growth. He is actually headed toward Ephesus (Acts 19:1); he said that he would return them them if God was willing (Acts 18:21). A more direct route to the Ephesians would have been to sail from Antioch to Ephesus. But the man of God is not finished with the work that was begun on his first missionary journey.

He returned to his former fields and further ministered to the churches there. A journey to Ephesus by sea would have been much easier. The foot journey from Antioch to Ephesus was well in excess of 1,000 miles. Paul set a notable example of the importance of continued nurture of new converts. (Polhill, 1992, 395-396)

When I examine my life in the light of this passage a question is raised: Is there anyone that the Lord used me to bring to Him that I should now visit to strengthen?

Apollos Message – Excellent but Incomplete (Acts 18:24-25) — Luke now returns to Ephesus to describe what happened after Paul’s departure. Priscilla and Aquila had remained there, and in the synagogue they heard a dynamic speaker—Apollos. An Alexandrian-born Jew, he was eloquent (λόγιος, logios) and mighty in the Scriptures (δυνατὸς ἐν ταῖς γραφαῖς, dynatos en tais graphais). When Apollos began to expound the scriptures there, the couple heard him and were greatly impressed by the learning and skill which he devoted to the defense of what he knew about the gospel gospel.

For all gospel preachers, calling people to repentance is a major part of the presentation (Jews – Acts 2:38; 319; 5:31; Gentiles – 11:18; 17:30; Everyone – 20:21; Luke 24:47). But it is not enough to appeal for change. There must be the good news of forgiveness and favor through faith in Christ, the better baptism of the Holy Spirit for those that receive Jesus, the joy of new community, and the mission of living for Jesus – Abundant Life. Advice: Preach the gospel, the whole gospel, and nothing but the gospel.

Marriage and Ministry Advice (Acts 18:26-28) — However, as they listened, they became aware of some gaps in his knowledge: he knew only the baptism of John. To be sure, Apollos was accurate in what he preached; but he was also incomplete. So they took their brother aside to help him. Out of public view they set forth “the way of God” to him more accurately. The investment of the apostle Paul was beginning to show a return; their time with Paul had culminated in their ability to teach others. This is the aim of discipleship. And we should appreciate and imitate their approach to dealing with deficiency. Bruce says it well:

But Priscilla and Aquila’s procedure was admirable: how much better it is to give such private help to a teacher whose understanding of his subject is deficient than to correct or denounce him publicly! (Bruce, 1988, p. 360)

They may have been left with a commission. Luke does not say whether or not Paul enjoined them to continue his work. Whether the apostle did or not, the mission of helping with evangelism and discipleship was theirs. Why? Because they are people surrendered to Jesus (Matthew 28:18-20); with or without Paul they have a calling to do what they can to make disciples. And together, the bride and groom cast a vision for every marriage comprised of Jesus followers. In them the goal of God for creating the first couple is clearly seen. Priscilla and Aquila collaborate as Christ followers for the glory of God, for the good of His people, and specifically in the cause of Christ. Their marriage matters because it becomes a means for making the message known. Here is what they are saying to us:

Marriage is more than a sacred symbol of Christ and His Church. It is union with purpose: the gospel is illustrated when husband and wife collaborate to glorify God and do good for others.
Advice: Make our marriage accessible to the community. Collaborate to help to deal with deficiencies.

And then what must we say about Apollos? Look at what the passage says:

• Eloquent or Learned: LOGIOS (λόγιος) — The Greek adjective logios can describe an accomplished speaker or a learned, educated person. In Acts 18:24, Luke presents Apollos as someone gifted in communication and intellectual engagement. This is the only occurrence of logios in the Greek New Testament.
• Mighty or Capable: DYNATOS (δυνατός) — The phrase dynatos ōn en tais graphais (δυνατὸς ὢν ἐν ταῖς γραφαῖς) means “being mighty in the Scriptures.” Apollos was not merely polished in speech; he was capable of understanding, reasoning from, and defending the Scriptures. In Acts 18:28 he powerfully demonstrated from the Scriptures that Jesus is the Christ.
• Teachable Teacher: HUMILITY — Acts 18:25–26 says Apollos taught accurately concerning Jesus but knew only the baptism of John. His instruction was therefore incomplete. Priscilla and Aquila took him aside and explained the way of God more accurately. The narrative portrays him as receptive to further instruction, despite his considerable abilities. The passage does not explicitly detail everything he knew or did not know about the Holy Spirit, so we should avoid overstating that point.

Apollos had the eloquence to communicate effectively, the scriptural competence to argue convincingly, and the humility to be taught more accurately. The teacher is still teachable and so his ministry can increase.
Advice: Be open to input. Don’t wait for correction; ask for feedback.

Questions for Consideration and Action Items

Section	Question for Consideration	Action Item
Headed Home (Acts 18:18–21)	Am I submitting my plans to God’s will while making the most of present opportunities to speak about Jesus?	Bring one upcoming decision before the Lord in prayer. Identify someone you can speak with about Christ while you await His direction.
Return to Worship, Report, and Work (Acts 18:22–23)	Who has come to faith through my influence but still needs my encouragement and help to grow?	Contact that person this week. Arrange a time to listen, pray together, and study a passage that addresses their present needs.
Apollos’s Message—Excellent but Incomplete (Acts 18:24–25)	When I speak about following Jesus, do I explain both the call to repentance and the good news of forgiveness through faith in Him?	Practice a brief gospel explanation that includes repentance, Christ’s death and resurrection, forgiveness through faith, and the call to follow Him.
Marriage and Ministry Advice (Acts 18:26–28)	How are we using our marriage—or our partnerships with other believers—to make Christ known and strengthen His people?	With your spouse or a fellow believer, choose one person or couple to encourage, welcome into your home, or help understand Scripture more accurately.
A Teachable Teacher (Acts 18:26–28)	Am I humble enough to receive correction, and gracious enough to offer it privately when someone needs help?	Ask a mature believer to identify one area where your understanding or ministry could improve. Receive the feedback without defending yourself and act on what is sound.

References

Bruce, F. F. (1988). The Book of the Acts (p. 355). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, pp. 395–396). Broadman & Holman Publishers.

 

 

1 Introduction

The Jesus follower faces a growing need for biblical guidance in dealing with the occult. Why? Because the occult is being aggressively pushed into our lives. It is smuggled in via movies, music, television, video games, and social media. In each of these outlets the occult is increasingly present as witchcraft/divination, communication with the dead, and other practices expressly forbidden in Scripture. In our culture these activities are depicted as harmless entertainment, paths to self-discovery, socially normal, or sources of power.Here are a few examples of how the occult is already being promoted in our culture:

Type	Title	How it involves the occult
Movie	Hocus Pocus	Features witches brought back from the dead, spellcasting, and supernatural powers within a comedic Halloween adventure. (movies.disney.com)
Movie	Practical Magic	Centers on sisters who practice witchcraft, including love spells and curses. Connects their magical abilities with family, sisterhood, and personal empowerment. (people.com)
Movie	Harry Potter film series	Centers on students learning witchcraft and wizardry, including spellcasting, potions, and divination. Its fictional world presents magical powers as abilities employed by both heroes and villains.
Music	“Voodoo”—Godsmack	The music video depicts witches performing a ritual with swords and features witchcraft practitioner Laurie Cabot and members of her coven. (en.wikipedia.org)
Music	“willow”—Taylor Swift	Performances feature cloaks, glowing orbs, and choreography evoking a gathering of witches. Swift described the staging as “a very witchy performance.” These theatrical elements do not establish that an actual spiritual ritual occurred. (people.com)
Television	Chilling Adventures of Sabrina	Combines teenage life with witchcraft, spells, demons, and a family connection to the Church of Night. Netflix explicitly describes the series as involving the occult and witchcraft. (media.netflix.com)
Television	American Horror Story: Coven	Centers on a community of witches, making witchcraft and supernatural power central to its characters and storyline. (www.fxnetworks.com)
Television	That’s So Raven	Centers on a teenager who experiences psychic visions of the future and acts on them. The series presents psychic foreknowledge within everyday teenage life with comedic flair. While the character Raven does not deliberately consult spirits to obtain her visions, the actress Raven-Symone does (Ng, 2023). Specifically, she said: She believes in psychics and thinks people can access information through energy fields. She experiences what she describes as visions, involving scenes in another dimension. She has been in contact with “spirit guides” since age seven, and described meditation as helping those guides assist her.
Social media	TikTok—WitchTok	Hosts communities sharing spell tutorials, tarot readings, and instruction in contemporary witchcraft. Viewers can move from watching content to attempting the practices themselves. (www.wired.com)
Social media	Instagram—witchcraft and tarot accounts	Some accounts promote tarot readings, spellcasting, and witchcraft instruction alongside lifestyle content. The concern involves these particular accounts and activities. (linktr.ee)
Annual event	Halloween—occult observances	Some celebrations incorporate fortune-telling, divination, or rituals associated with Samhain. Participation in these practices should be distinguished from wearing costumes or distributing candy. (en.wikipedia.org)
Annual event	Día de los Muertos—Day of the Dead	Some observances include offerings intended to welcome returning spirits of deceased relatives. Seeking interaction with departed spirits should be distinguished from remembering and honoring deceased loved ones. (americanhistory.si.edu)

Table 1: Occult Themes and Practices in Contemporary Media and Observances

As these practices become increasingly acceptable in our social circles, believers are being asked to endorse them, engage in them, and ignore the fact that God says these activities are paths to serious problems involving ancient evils.

But how close are you to the occult? Some of us are closer than we realize. In fact, after reading this book, you may come to see that you are actively involved. The company socials, school events, and some of our family traditions are lightly laced or heavily laden with spiritual activities that God has said we are to avoid.

But why? That is, to what end does God ask us not to be involved in the occult? What is wrong with a little magic? Because He cares and He knows that these seemingly light hearted and empowering activities are actually gateways to ungodly living and invitations to spirits no one in their right mind wants to have in their life.

He cares and that is why, through the words of the Bible, God discloses do and don’ts of spiritual activities. The don’ts are not Divine attempts to kill innocent joys, prevent prosperity, eliminate other avenues to enlightenment, and suppress self discovery. God’s prohibitions are expressions of His complete knowledge about the true nature of things and His love for His people (Deuteronomy 18:9–14). It is His care or love for people that moved Him to speak through various prophets against the occult. He wanted people then and now to know that nothing good will come from engaging the spiritual realm without Him.

This book is about helping the reader develop discernment about forbidden spiritual activities being promoted and practiced all around us. How will we get that discernment? Through prayerful consideration of what the Bible says about the occult and using that counsel to assess what we are seeing and being offered.

Through discernment the Jesus follower recognizes what can be accepted and even used for reaching people with God’s gospel of salvation, what must be watched carefully and tested, and what must be vigorously rejected. This study seeks to equip believers to understand the occult, recognize why God forbids involvement, and respond faithfully to a world that is commending to us ways of getting ahead using the spiritual realm without God.

God’s people are to get spiritual guidance for life through approved sources, to be satisfied in His provisions when dealing with difficulties and pursuing success, and to worship Him alone.

2 Understanding the Occult and God’s Prohibition

This chapter will equip the reader to recognize the occult and understand God’s prohibition on involvement. We will define occult practices and, through an examination of Deuteronomy 18:9–14, learn to identify contemporary expressions of the occult happening around us.

We will also learn to distinguish actual occult activity from stage illusions, fictional portrayals, harmless objects, and helpful practices. The questions guiding this part of our learning will be: What does this activity involve? What does it claim to accomplish? And does participation conflict with God’s revealed will?

Chapter Objectives

• Define the occult and recognize its practices.
• Examine Deuteronomy 18:9–14 to identify prohibited practices and their contemporary expressions.
• Distinguish occult involvement from stage illusions, fictional portrayals, and helpful practices.

2.1 What is the occult? (Deuteronomy 18:9-14)

9 “When you come into the land which the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominations of those nations. 10 There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, 11 or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. 12 For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord, and because of these abominations the Lord your God drives them out from before you. 13 You shall be blameless before the Lord your God. 14 For these nations which you will dispossess listened to soothsayers and diviners; but as for you, the Lord your God has not appointed such for you.

In this passage Moses is nearing the end of his time as leader of Israel. Soon the nation will be led by his assistant Joshua the son of Nun (). Under Joshua’s leadership Israel will begin to enter and take the land that has been promised. When the entering and taking starts to happen, the people of the nation of Israel are not to continue in the hated activities of the nations being dispossessed (Deuteronomy 18:14). God calls the activities that were being practiced by the nations being thrown out abominations. What are the abominations? They are detestable things.

2.1.1 Child Sacrifice

Hebrew: מַעֲבִיר בְּנוֹ־וּבִתּוֹ בָּאֵשׁ, maʿavir beno uvitto baʾesh

Description: Making one’s son or daughter pass through fire (Deuteronomy 18:10) is a way of describing an ancient practice of sacrificing a child to a false god in order to gain favor with that illegitimate deity. In the case mentioned in the passage above, the son or daughter would be given to the god as a burn offering. The wider biblical context speaks forcefully against the practice of sacrificing children to other gods (Leviticus 18:21; Deuteronomy 12:31; Jeremiah 7:31; 19:5; 32:35; Ezekiel 16:20-21).

Contemporary example: Consider a person who kills a child as a ritual offering in the belief that a spirit will grant wealth, protection, or success. We may be quick to say that this is not a modern day practice. Not true. This is still taking place in other countries and the United States.

Documented case	What the evidence establishes
Uganda, 2024 killing; 2026 conviction	Eleven-year-old Oliver Namanda was killed in Kiboga District. Daily Monitor reports that Madina Nakyeyune was convicted of murder, human sacrifice, and aggravated child trafficking and sentenced to 32 years. The court relied on circumstantial evidence, including DNA analysis and police tracking. A co-defendant was acquitted. (Wandera, 2026)
Uganda, Supreme Court case decided in 2017	The Ugandan prosecution service’s case resource describes a toddler supplied to a ritual practitioner for sacrifice in a transaction involving promised money. The case concerned aggravated trafficking in children. (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, 2017)
Elyse Pahler, 15—California, 1995	Three teenage boys killed Pahler in what investigators described as a planned sacrifice to Satan, believing it would improve their musical abilities. All three pleaded no contest to first-degree murder and received sentences of 25 or 26 years to life (Fountain, 2025).
Chase, Hunter, and Clayton Doerman, ages 3, 4, and 7—Ohio, 2023	Their father, Chad Doerman, killed them and pleaded guilty in 2024. Police-interview footage released in 2026 shows him claiming that he acted “for God” and discussing sacrifice and a supposed divine test. His statements establish his claimed justification, rather than a judicial finding of an occult motive (LeBus & Harry, 2026).

Table 2: Documented Child Killings Involving Sacrificial Motives or Claims

You will say these are isolated cases. However, when we kill unborn children in order to make ourselves more suitable for a career or to prevent the inconvenience of an unwanted pregnancy, we are practicing child sacrifice — an abomination to the Lord. They offered their children to Molech; we offer our children to Career, Material Gain, and Convenience.

Child Sacrifice — offering a child’s life to a deity or spiritual power in an attempt to obtain favor, protection, prosperity, or some other desired benefit. Its practitioners treat the child’s death as an offering through which they hope to secure spiritual assistance or personal advantage. This practice is occult because it seeks benefits from the spiritual realm through an act God expressly forbids. Children bear His image; they are persons to be protected, not offerings to be exchanged for a better life. Scripture describes the sacrifice of children to false gods as sacrificing them to demons and condemns it as the shedding of innocent blood (Leviticus 18:21; Deuteronomy 12:31; Psalm 106:37–38; Jeremiah 19:5).

2.1.2 Witchcraft / Divination

Hebrew: קֹסֵם קְסָמִים, qosem qesamim

Description: Practicing divination: seeking hidden knowledge or guidance through forbidden spiritual methods. The NKJV renders this broad expression witchcraft (Numbers 22:7; Joshua 13:22; Ezekiel 21:21–23).

Contemporary examples: In our world this can be seen in using astrology, Tarot Cards, Ouija boards, and other things to get insights for living. The contemporary example occurs when someone considers consulting a Tarot reader before deciding whether to marry, change jobs, or move. The cards are treated as a source of hidden spiritual guidance rather than as ordinary illustrations. Instead of seeking guidance from God the person using the Ouija board, astrology, Enneagram, or Tarot card is after helpful insight without acknowledging the source of wisdom. But what are these things?

Item or practice	Description and modern use
Tarot Cards	Illustrated cards interpreted as revealing hidden information, future possibilities, or guidance for decisions and relationships. Tarot originated as a card game in fifteenth-century Europe. Its systematic use for occult divination developed in late eighteenth-century France and became increasingly popular during the nineteenth century. (www.themorgan.org)
Ouija Boards	Boards displaying letters, numbers, and words such as “yes” and “no.” Participants rest their fingers on a movable pointer, called a planchette, and interpret its movements as messages, often attributed to spirits or deceased people. Modern talking boards emerged during the 1880s; commercial Ouija production began in 1890, followed by a U.S. patent in 1891. Companies: Hasbro owns the Ouija trademark and has marketed its own editions; Winning Moves Games produces the Classic and Salem editions. Retailers: Classic Ouija boards are listed through Walmart.com, Michaels.com (online only), and Winning Moves’ own website. Local store inventory varies. (guides.loc.gov)
Astrology and Horoscopes	The interpretation of celestial positions and movements as indications of personality, compatibility, future events, or appropriate times for decisions. Astrology is ancient, but its familiar mass-market form—newspaper and magazine horoscopes organized around birth signs—became popular during the 1930s. R. H. Naylor’s 1930 horoscope for Princess Margaret helped launch the modern newspaper astrology column. (www.newyorker.com)
Enneagram	A nine-type personality system used for self-understanding, relationships, and, in some settings, spiritual guidance. Modern Use: G. I. Gurdjieff introduced the symbol into his esoteric teaching in the early twentieth century; Oscar Ichazo developed the personality system in the 1960s, and Claudio Naranjo expanded and disseminated it in the 1970s. Occult Connections: Mitchell Pacwa’s historical critique links its development to Gurdjieff’s occult numerology and Ichazo’s claimed guidance from spiritual entities, including “Metatron” and an interior master called the “Green Qu’Tub.” The Enneagram Institute independently acknowledges the system’s modern development and mystical influences. (Pacwa, 2009; The Enneagram Institute, n.d.).

Table 3: Tools and Practices Used to Seek Hidden Knowledge or Guidance

Because it is used so often in Christian circles, you may be surprised to see the Enneagram in Table 3. But look at where it came from. Claudio Naranjo, a principal developer of the Enneagram’s personality descriptions, stated:

“Much of what is now in the Enneagram literature came to me by automatic writing.” (Naranjo, n.d.)

The Enneagram’s origins raise concerns beyond its association with mysticism. Claudio Naranjo attributed much of its personality literature to “automatic writing,” a practice historically associated with spiritualist mediumship and purported messages from spirits. This connects its development with a method also found in the world of séances and spirit communication, rather than simply with conventional personality research.^[1]

The biggest problems with the Enneagram are (1) its occult origins and (2) the authority people give it. People use it to discover who they are and decide how they should live. When its personality categories become the controlling explanation of their identity and the deciding voice in their choices, it functions as a sovereign guide and sage counselor in a life that should be directed by God and His revealed word (Proverbs 3:5–6; Psalm 119:105; Colossians 2:8–10).

So then, what is witchcraft or divination? Here below I have a definition for you.

Witchcraft or divination — seeking hidden knowledge or guidance through forbidden spiritual methods. Its practitioners use tools such as Tarot cards, Ouija boards, and astrology to obtain information that promises an advantage in daily life or insight into what lies ahead. These tools and the techniques for using them are occult because, in forbidden attempts to get information from the spiritual realm, they facilitate (1) the entry of demons into the lives of people that use them, (2) possession of the body or parts of the body used in the practices, and (3) deceptions aimed at (i) distracting people from trusting Jesus and (ii) destroying lives (Acts 16:16-18; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; John 10:10).

2.1.3 Soothsaying and Omen Interpretation

Hebrew: מְעוֹנֵן, meʿonen (soothsaying); מְנַחֵשׁ, menaḥesh (omen interpretation)

Description: These related practices seek hidden information or guidance through occult observation and the interpretation of signs. Soothsaying claims to discern hidden information or future events (Leviticus 19:26; 2 Kings 21:6; Isaiah 2:6; Micah 5:12). Omen interpretation reads events or signs as supernatural indications of hidden realities or future outcomes (Genesis 44:5, 15; Leviticus 19:26; 2 Kings 17:17). The terms are considered together here because their functions overlap.

Both soothsaying (claiming the ability discern hidden information or future events) and omen interpretation (treating events or signs as supernatural messages) seek knowledge that promises an advantage in daily life or insight into what lies ahead. These practices are occult because they pursue spiritual guidance through means God has forbidden. The information obtained through these occult practices may be accurate, but the sources are not good. Their practitioners direct people to trust predictions and signs rather than Jesus and His revealed word.

Contemporary examples: Consider someone paying for a psychic forecast and arranging important decisions around its predictions. Another example is treating the appearance of a bird or a repeated number as a supernatural instruction to accept an offer or end a relationship. In both cases, the person treats the prediction or sign as a source of hidden knowledge and gives it authority to direct a decision.

2.1.4 Sorcery and Spell Conjuring

Hebrew: מְכַשֵּׁף, mekhashshef (sorcerer); חֹבֵר חָבֶר, ḥover ḥaver (spell conjurer)

Description: These related practices seek to produce effects or influence people and circumstances through magical arts. A sorcerer practices such arts to obtain supernatural results (Exodus 7:11; 22:18; 2 Chronicles 33:6; Malachi 3:5). An example of sorcery is seen in the conflict between Team Moses and Team Pharoah. God gives Aaron, the brother and speaker for Moses, the miracle of turning an ordinary wooden rod into a serpent. The power to make this happen came from the Lord. In the conflict between Team Moses and Team Pharoah, the magicians show that they can do the same thing. Through their enchantments their rods became serpents on the ground.

8 Then the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying, 9 “When Pharaoh speaks to you, saying, ‘Show a miracle for yourselves,’ then you shall say to Aaron, ‘Take your rod and cast it before Pharaoh, and let it become a serpent.’ ” 10 So Moses and Aaron went in to Pharaoh, and they did so, just as the Lord commanded. And Aaron cast down his rod before Pharaoh and before his servants, and it became a serpent. 11 But Pharaoh also called the wise men and the sorcerers; so the magicians of Egypt, they also did in like manner with their enchantments. Exodus 7:8–11 (NKJV)

The work of Aaron was a miracle (Exodus 7:10); the power to do this supernatural work came from God and was approved. When the seemingly identical work is done by the magicians, the reader is beholding sorcery. The transformation of their rods into serpents was also supernatural. But it was accomplished through means (enchantments) not approved by God (Exodus 7:11).

A spell conjurer casts spells or employs enchantments intended to exert magical influence (Psalm 58:4–5; Isaiah 47:9, 12). The terms sorcerer and spell conjurer are considered together here because spell casting is closely related to the broader practice of sorcery, while retaining the distinction between the two Hebrew expressions.

Sorcery and Spell Conjuring — manipulation of people and things to achieve otherwise unlikely or supernatural outcomes. These practices are occult because they achieve their ends using power and processes that have not been approved by God to gain or keep controlling influence (2 Thessalonians 2:9-10; Revelation 16:13-14; 19:20).

Contemporary examples: Consider someone purchasing a ritual service advertised as able to compel affection, harm a rival, or secure prosperity through supernatural power. Another example is repeating an incantation over a charm, believing the spoken formula will bind another person or provide supernatural protection. Both involve trusting magical practices to influence people or circumstances.

2.1.5 Medium, Spiritist, and Caller of the Dead

These three related terms describe seeking counsel through claimed communication with spirits. Their meanings overlap, but each highlights an aspect of the practice.

• Medium: A person who claims to act as an intermediary between people and spirits. The Hebrew phrase שֹׁאֵל אוֹב, shoʾel ʾov, emphasizes consulting a spirit or medium for information or assistance (Leviticus 19:31; 20:6; 1 Samuel 28:7–8; 1 Chronicles 10:13–14).
• Spiritist: A practitioner associated with a spirit or with claimed supernatural knowledge. The Hebrew term יִדְּעֹנִי, yiddeʿoni, is closely associated with mediumship; its precise distinction from “medium” is uncertain (Leviticus 19:31; 20:27; 2 Kings 23:24; Isaiah 8:19).
• Caller of the Dead: One who seeks information or assistance from the dead—a necromancer. The Hebrew expression דֹרֵשׁ אֶל־הַמֵּתִים, doresh ʾel-hammetim, identifies the dead as those being consulted (1 Samuel 28:8–19; Isaiah 8:19; 1 Chronicles 10:13–14).

To get an idea of what a medium is we should consider an example from Scripture. The story that serves is from an episode in the life of Israel’s first human monarch – King Saul. The king is going into battle with a nation called the Philistines and is feeling unsure of his chances. In fact, when Saul saw the Philistine army, he was afraid. The LORD did not answer his inquiries, so Saul sought a medium; previously he had expelled mediums and spiritists from the land. Disguising himself, he asked the woman at En Dor to bring up someone he would name (1 Samuel 28:5–8).

5 When Saul saw the army of the Philistines, he was afraid, and his heart trembled greatly. 6 And when Saul inquired of the Lord, the Lord did not answer him, either by dreams or by Urim or by the prophets. 7 Then Saul said to his servants, “Find me a woman who is a medium, that I may go to her and inquire of her.” And his servants said to him, “In fact, there is a woman who is a medium at En Dor.” 8 So Saul disguised himself and put on other clothes, and he went, and two men with him; and they came to the woman by night. And he said, “Please conduct a séance for me, and bring up for me the one I shall name to you.” 1 Samuel 28:5–8

This passage illustrates a medium’s claimed role as an intermediary between the living and the dead. Saul’s request also exposes the temptation behind consulting one: fear and the desire for guidance can move a person to seek through forbidden spiritual sources what God has chosen not to disclose.

Medium, Spiritist, Caller of the Dead — getting counsel through communication with beings that are (1) allegedly people that have previously passed away, (2) angels that want to provide helpful insights, or (3) other types of spirits. The medium, spiritist, or caller of the dead works in league with lying entities that promise intel that can be used for human endeavors (1 Kings 22:21–23; John 8:44; 2 Corinthians 11:14–15; 1 Timothy 4:1).

The passages in this definition address lying spirits, Satan’s character as a liar, his disguise as an angel of light, and deceiving spirits, respectively.

Contemporary examples: Consider someone consulting a channeler who claims to receive instructions from a spirit guide. The client asks the spirit, through the practitioner, for direction about family, work, or the future. Another example is seeking a practitioner who claims that a familiar spirit supplies otherwise inaccessible information.

The Familiar Spirit
John MacArthur connects mediumship and occult information with demonic activity. The familiar spirit, in his sermon, is what we would call a familiar spirit (MacArthur, 1973).

Got Questions Ministries directly defines familiar spirits as spirits associated with occult practitioners and identifies them with deceptive demonic guides (Got Questions Ministries, 2026).

Both involve turning to claimed spirit communication for knowledge or guidance.

Consider someone attending a séance or using a Ouija board to ask a deceased relative for advice. The defining feature is the attempt to obtain communication or assistance from the dead.

These contemporary examples are illustrative scenarios. Some practices overlap; the central question is whether a person seeks spiritual knowledge, power, protection, or contact through means God forbids.

The person that does these things becomes an abomination himself (Deuteronomy 18:12; Matthew 16:23; Mark 8:33). Let that sink in. Continued practice of activities that God detests causes the actor to become detestable. On account of the practice of things that disgust God, the people in the land were being driven out and replaced by Israel. These detestable activities are the occult. Both then and now they are ways of trying to win in life by leveraging the spiritual realm without God’s approval.

2.2 The Guidance God Provides (Deuteronomy 18:15-20)

15 “The Lord your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, 16 according to all you desired of the Lord your God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, ‘Let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God, nor let me see this great fire anymore, lest I die.’ 17 “And the Lord said to me: ‘What they have spoken is good. 18 I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. 19 And it shall be that whoever will not hear My words, which He speaks in My name, I will require it of him. 20 But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die.’

2.2.1 The Prophet Like Moses (Deuteronomy 18:15)

When it comes to bringing God’s will to the people, Moses introduced something new. What did he introduce? Face-to-face revelation. No riddles or dark sayings were used when God talked with Moses (Numbers 12:8). But, was it really new? The composer of Moses’ epitaph says as much: Moses was the prophet of (1) face-to-face learning and (2) through whom God performed both wonders and signs (Deuteronomy 34:10–11). (Merril, 1994, p. 273). With these things in mind, Jesus is to be seen as the Prophet like Moses.^[2]

Point to establish	Scripture references and significance
Jesus had seen the Father.	John 6:46 — Jesus explicitly states that the One who is from God has seen the Father. John 1:18 — The Son uniquely reveals the Father, whom no one else has seen.
The Father revealed all things to Jesus.	John 5:20 — The Father loves the Son and shows Him all things that He Himself does. Matthew 11:27; Luke 10:22 — All things have been delivered to Jesus by His Father; the Son uniquely knows and reveals Him. John 8:28; 12:49–50 — Jesus teaches and speaks according to the Father’s instruction.
Jesus’ signs and wonders authenticated His authority.	Mark 2:1–12, especially vv. 10–12 — Jesus heals the paralytic to demonstrate His authority to forgive sins. John 5:36; 10:37–38 — His works testify that the Father sent Him. Acts 2:22 — God attested Jesus through miracles, wonders, and signs. John 20:30–31 — The recorded signs support belief that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.

Table 4: Scripture Supporting Jesus’ Revelation and Authority

But Jesus does not merely bring a word from God. He is the Word (John 1:1-3). Truth that would be sought through the occult is brought through the Prophet. But he is not just bringing truth. He is the Truth (John 14:6).

In Christ the need for the occult is cut off. Rather than using unapproved ways of getting the truth for succeeding in life, in Christ I have it all: the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

2.2.2 Easier to Hear (Deuteronomy 18:16-18)

Israel’s need for a mediator became clear at Horeb (Sinai), where the people, terrified by God’s voice and the mountain burning with fire, pleaded with Moses to approach God on their behalf and bring His word to them (Deuteronomy 5:22–31; Exodus 20:18–21). Thompson (1974, p. 234) explains that this incident helps define the prophet’s role in Israel, while Merrill (1994, p. 273) emphasizes their need for someone who could approach God and communicate His revelation to them. This need finds its fullest answer in Jesus Christ, the one Mediator between God and humanity, who gave Himself to secure our redemption (1 Timothy 2:5–6; Hebrews 9:15). Having shared our humanity and suffered temptation, Jesus became a merciful and faithful High Priest who understands our weaknesses and helps those who are tempted; through Him, we may therefore approach God’s throne with confidence to receive mercy and grace (Hebrews 2:14–18; 4:14–16).

The occult counterfeits what I have in Christ. In Christ the need for mediums and familiar spirits is eliminated. We have in Him the Mediator who brings us to the Father of spirits, and we have the Spirit of God who guides us in His truth. We no longer need anyone to call up the dead for counsel: our risen Savior lives to intercede for us, and through Him we may approach God directly for mercy, grace, and help (John 16:13–14; 1 Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 4:14–16; 7:25).

God defined the prophetic role as receiving His words and faithfully communicating them to His people. The prophet like Moses would speak what God entrusted to him, rather than a message of his own invention (Merrill, 1994, p. 273). Jesus perfectly fulfilled this role: His teaching came from the Father, who directed both what He should say and how He should speak.

Point to establish	Supporting Scripture
Jesus spoke what the Father entrusted to Him.	John 7:16 — His teaching came from the One who sent Him. John 8:28 — He spoke as the Father taught Him. John 12:49–50 — The Father commanded what He should say and speak. John 14:10, 24 — His words came from the Father.
Jesus withheld further teaching when His disciples were not ready to receive it.	John 16:12–15 — Jesus had more to say, but His disciples could not yet bear it. The Spirit would subsequently guide them into truth. This passage identifies their readiness as the reason for withholding that teaching.
Isaiah portrays the Servant as taught by God through attentive listening each morning.	Isaiah 50:4–5 — The Lord gives His Servant an instructed tongue and awakens His ear morning by morning. Christians understand this Servant passage as fulfilled in Jesus.
Jesus sought solitary communion with the Father early in the morning.	Mark 1:35 — Jesus rose before daylight and prayed in a solitary place. Luke 5:16; 6:12 — He regularly withdrew to pray and sometimes prayed throughout the night. These passages establish His prayer life; they do not explicitly say that each morning’s teaching was dictated during prayer.

Table 5: Jesus’ Teaching from the Father and Life of Prayer

2.2.3 Test Spiritual Claims by the Truth About Christ

1 John 4:1–6. Explain false prophets and the Christ-centered test. Avoid reducing discernment to intuition or unusual feelings.

2.2.4 Seek God Rather Than the Dead

Isaiah 8:19–22. Explain the spiritual crisis, the appeal of mediums, and the summons to measure guidance by God’s revealed instruction. Isaiah 8:19–20 provides a particularly strong organizing question: Why seek the dead when God invites His people to seek Him?

2.2.5 A Sign Does Not Establish God’s Approval

Deuteronomy 13:1–5. Explain why an impressive sign cannot authorize departure from allegiance to God. Distinguish Israel’s covenant penalties from the church’s response today.

2.3 The Takeaway Questions and Actions

Takeaway question	Action	Supporting Scripture
Whose words are shaping my identity and daily choices?	Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly: read, remember, and apply His teaching.	Colossians 3:16; John 8:31–32
Where do I turn when I am afraid or uncertain?	Seek God through prayer and His revealed word; bring a specific concern to Him rather than consulting forbidden spiritual sources.	Proverbs 3:5–6; James 1:5; Isaiah 8:19–20
Am I relying on a medium or spirit guide for what I have in Christ?	Approach the Father through Jesus, our Mediator, trusting His intercession and seeking mercy, grace, and help.	1 Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 4:14–16; 7:25
Do I test spiritual claims by their agreement with God’s truth?	Evaluate predictions, experiences, and teachers by Scripture and their testimony about Jesus; refuse guidance that draws you away from Him.	Deuteronomy 13:1–4; 1 John 4:1–3
What response do Christ’s words require of me?	Identify one command of Jesus you need to obey and take a concrete step of obedience today.	Deuteronomy 18:18–19; John 12:48–50; James 1:22
Is there an occult practice I need to leave, or a neighbor I need to help?	End participation, seek pastoral support, and offer others a gracious explanation of your hope in Christ.	Acts 19:18–20; 2 Timothy 2:24–26; 1 Peter 3:15

Table 6: Takeaway Questions and Actions

3 Why does God forbid involvement (1 Corinthians 10:14-22)

This chapter will equip the reader to understand why God forbids involvement in occult practices and how allegiance to Christ determines when we can and cannot participate in cultural practices. Through an examination of 1 Corinthians 10:14–33, we will learn why participation in idolatrous worship is incompatible with fellowship with Christ and distinguish that participation from ordinary contact with our neighbors.

We will also consider what it means to walk as children of light and apply biblical principles of conscience, Christian liberty, and love to decisions about Halloween. The questions guiding this part of our learning will be: Does this activity involve something God forbids? Does it please the Lord? And how will my participation affect my conscience, other people, and my witness for Christ?

Chapter Objectives

• Examine 1 Corinthians 10:14–33 to explain why idolatrous participation conflicts with allegiance to Christ.
• Apply Ephesians 5:8–17 to discern what pleases the Lord and refuse fellowship with works of darkness.
• Use Romans 14:1–6, 13–23 to evaluate Halloween activities with conscience and love, distinguishing disputable matters from practices Scripture expressly forbids.

14 Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge for yourselves what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread. 18 Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? 19 What am I saying then? That an idol is anything, or what is offered to idols is anything? 20 Rather, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to demons and not to God, and I do not want you to have fellowship with demons. 21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons. 22 Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than He? 23 All things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful; all things are lawful for me, but not all things edify. 24 Let no one seek his own, but each one the other’s well-being. 25 Eat whatever is sold in the meat market, asking no questions for conscience’ sake; 26 for “the earth is the Lord’s, and all its fullness.” 27 If any of those who do not believe invites you to dinner, and you desire to go, eat whatever is set before you, asking no question for conscience’ sake. 28 But if anyone says to you, “This was offered to idols,” do not eat it for the sake of the one who told you, and for conscience’ sake; for “the earth is the Lord’s, and all its fullness.” 29 “Conscience,” I say, not your own, but that of the other. For why is my liberty judged by another man’s conscience? 30 But if I partake with thanks, why am I evil spoken of for the food over which I give thanks? 31 Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. 32 Give no offense, either to the Jews or to the Greeks or to the church of God, 33 just as I also please all men in all things, not seeking my own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved.

Time	Content	Method
0–4	God requires exclusive allegiance. Participation can involve fellowship incompatible with allegiance to Christ. Explain 1 Corinthians 10 in its context of idolatrous worship.	Isaiah 8:19-20; 1 Corinthians 10:14–22
4–9	Apply 1 Corinthians 10:14–33, Ephesians 5:8–11, and Romans 14:1–6, 13–23. Christian liberty never authorizes idolatry; conscience and neighbor-love also matter.	Bible study
9–14	Spiritual claims and impressive experiences must be tested against God’s revealed truth.	Deuteronomy 13:1–4; 1 John 4:1–3
	Session Break
14–20	Evaluate three situations: an invitation to a séance; ordinary neighborhood candy distribution; a party that includes a psychic reading.	Group cases
20–30	Draft a household plan: boundaries, children’s questions, hospitality, alternatives, and a gracious explanation to others.	Individual worksheet

Table 7: Teaching Plan for Understanding God’s Prohibition

3.1 Participation Expresses Fellowship and Allegiance

3.1.1 The Lord’s Table

The Lord’s Table is a sacred gathering of believers to remember and be stirred up to live effectively in His service. Jesus Himself is present in this gathering in a special way to help in the goal of being reminded of God’s amazing grace toward sinners through Christ (Luke 22:19–20; 1 Corinthians 10:16), renewed in devotion to doing the will of the Son (2 Corinthians 5:14–15), and preaching the gospel daily among ourselves (1 Corinthians 11:26; Hebrews 3:13). This supper cannot be treated as a mere ritual or means to a meal; treating it this way brings judgment upon the believer. A self-examination is to be done before the elements are taken so that unconfessed sin or unresolved matters can be handled first (1 Corinthians 11:27–32; cf. Matthew 5:23–24; 1 John 1:9).

Paul distinguishes participation in idolatrous worship from ordinary association with unbelievers. He prohibits sharing in an idolatrous sacrificial meal (1 Corinthians 10:14–22), yet permits eating at an unbeliever’s home, subject to considerations of conscience and what the meal communicates (10:27–29). Likewise, separating from idolaters does not require withdrawing from everyone who practices idolatry (5:9–10).

3.1.2 Pagan Sacrificial Meals

Satan and his demons intentionally counterfeit the work of Christ (2 Corinthians 11:13–15). Just as there is a special meal shared by Jesus and His followers, there were rituals in Old Testament times through which people offered sacrifices to the demons they served (Deuteronomy 32:16–17; Psalm 106:37–38). In New Testament times, believers sometimes faced invitations or pressure to join pagan sacrificial meals, in which food was offered in idolatrous worship. Scripture identifies these sacrifices as offerings to demons and forbids believers from participating in their worship (1 Corinthians 8:10; 10:19–22; Revelation 2:14, 20).

3.1.3 Paul’s Warning

Those who ate of Israel’s sacrifices participated in the altar (1 Corinthians 10:18). Paul appeals to this familiar practice to explain that eating a sacrificial meal establishes fellowship with the worship it represents. In the same way, those who participate in meals offered to demons enter into fellowship with demons (1 Corinthians 10:19–20). This cannot be. The believer belongs to a holy priesthood that offers spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2:5, 9); the same person must not participate in the worship of demons. We cannot partake of the Lord’s table and the table of demons (1 Corinthians 10:21–22).

When I eat what was offered in the ritual that I attended I am acting as a priest. In principle, when I attend events where people practice the occult I am committing two crimes: (1) endorsement – by my presence I promote the practice of what God prohibits and (2) engagement – by eating at a table of demon worship I am engaged in demon-honoring activity.

3.2 Walk as Children of Light

Ephesians 5:8–17. Explain conduct consistent with belonging to Christ, discerning what pleases Him, and refusing fellowship with works of darkness.

3.2.1 Conduct Consistent for Christ Followers (Ephesians 5:8-9)

Both Paul and Peter say that life prior to Christ was a life of darkness or disobedience (Ephesians 2:1–3; 5:8; 1 Peter 1:14; 2:9). We now belong to God as His children and have received a new nature through His work in us (John 1:12–13; Ephesians 4:24; 2 Peter 1:4); our walk should reflect that new nature (Ephesians 4:22–24; 5:8). This inward change should become apparent in our conduct; it involved new birth (1 Peter 1:3, 23), washing (1 Corinthians 6:11), and regeneration (Titus 3:5). If I am born of the Holy Spirit (John 3:5–8), who produces righteousness in us (Romans 8:4–13) and is the Spirit of truth (John 16:13), I should begin to bear resemblance to that same Spirit in a life of goodness, righteousness, and truth (Ephesians 5:8–9).

How is that going to happen?

3.2.2 Determine What Pleases God (Ephesians 5:10, 17)

We are often found reaching for a rule to regulate us, a law to help us remain legal, and a clearly stated commandment to control our conduct. But that is not what God is wanting from us. Look at what Paul says in Ephesians and notice that the verbs about discovering God’s will are participles (VR). They describe an ongoing activity that goes with what I do. As the situations change the word of God, which is living and active (VR), is being used by the Spirit to help me in the ongoing work of figuring out what to do (Ephesians 2:10, 17) and how to teach it to others (Ezra 7:10).

3.2.3 Refusing Fellowship with Works of Darkness (Ephesians 5:11)

Some offers of fellowship, based on the activities involved, must be refused (Ephesians 5:7–11; 1 Corinthians 10:20–22). In refusing, we are not assuming responsibility for judging those outside the church. Paul asks what business he has judging outsiders and explains that God judges them (1 Corinthians 5:12–13). At the same time, there can be no justification for becoming conformed to the world (Romans 12:2). Occult practices cannot be common ground between believers and unbelievers; they belong to the works of the devil that Jesus came to destroy (Deuteronomy 18:10–12; 1 John 3:8). Our new life in Christ should be evident in transformed thinking, holy conduct, and love expressed through good works (Ephesians 4:22–24; 1 Peter 1:14–16; John 13:34–35; Titus 2:11–14).

3.3 Handling Halloween With Conscience and Love

Romans 14:1–6, 13–23. Explain disputable matters, personal accountability, and concern for another believer. Explain why this passage cannot authorize practices Scripture expressly forbids.

3.3.1 Discussing the Disputable

Some things that I could do are not expressly prohibited or promoted by God. It is a judgement call for someone who has learned to look at things through the light of the Scriptures (Acts 10:17; Ephesians 2:10, 17). One person may be convinced that they cannot do such things; they regard it as sin. What should I do when I find myself in fellowship with someone who cannot take part in something because they believe it to be occult or otherwise immoral… when it isn’t? Welcome them into your community so they can be converted to your way of thinking? No! Receiving a fellow believer in order to reform them is wrong.

3.3.2 Harmless Costumes and Concern for Others

Scripture does not directly address witch costumes, but when dressing as a witch celebrates or presents occult practice as harmless, these three biblical principles support calling it an endorsement:

1. Celebration – It celebrates an identity associated with practices God condemns. God expressly forbids witchcraft, sorcery, and consulting the dead (Deuteronomy 18:10–12). Presenting those practices as attractive or desirable conflicts with the command to abhor evil and cling to good (Romans 12:9).
2. Normalization – It can normalize what believers are called to expose. Paul commands believers to have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead to expose them (Ephesians 5:8–11). Making witchcraft an appealing form of entertainment can communicate acceptance and obscure its spiritual seriousness.
3. Encouragement – It can encourage others to become involved. Our example can embolden others to participate in practices their consciences recognize as wrong (1 Corinthians 8:9–13). A believer’s costume may communicate that occult involvement is compatible with following Christ, despite Paul’s prohibition against fellowship with demons (1 Corinthians 10:20–22).

Here below are reasons why I may refrain from an activity that is not sin for me.

1. Love places another believer’s spiritual welfare above my freedom. Having the right to do something does not mean exercising that right will build others up. Mature believers seek their neighbor’s good and willingly limit their liberty when its exercise could harm someone else (1 Corinthians 8:1, 9; 10:23–24).
2. My example can encourage someone to violate his conscience. Paul warns that a believer’s apparent freedom can embolden another person to participate despite believing the activity is wrong. Leading someone into that kind of sin wounds a brother for whom Christ died and sins against Christ Himself (1 Corinthians 8:10–12; Romans 14:23).
3. Pursuing peace and spiritual growth is more important than exercising a personal right. Paul urges believers to avoid placing stumbling blocks before one another and to pursue what builds others up. He willingly forgoes otherwise permissible activities when they cause a brother to stumble (Romans 14:13, 19–21; 1 Corinthians 8:13).

3.4 The Takeaway Questions and Actions

Takeaway question	Action	Supporting Scripture
Would this activity express fellowship with Christ or participation in worship God forbids?	Find out what the event actually involves. Refuse occult rituals and sacrificial meals that involve fellowship with demons; explain your allegiance to Christ graciously.	1 Corinthians 10:14–22; Ephesians 5:11
Does my conduct reflect my new life in Christ and what pleases Him?	Evaluate the activity and what your presence or costume communicates. Reject what celebrates evil; choose conduct marked by goodness, righteousness, and truth.	Ephesians 5:8–11, 17; Romans 12:2, 9
Can I participate with a clear conscience before the Lord?	Distinguish forbidden practices from disputable matters. Do not participate while believing it is wrong, or pressure another believer to violate his conscience.	Romans 14:1–6, 12, 22–23
Could exercising my freedom lead another believer to stumble?	Consider whether your example could encourage occult involvement or conduct against conscience. Willingly decline even a permissible Halloween activity when love requires it; seek your brother’s good and spiritual growth.	1 Corinthians 8:9–13; 10:23–24; Romans 14:13, 19–21

Table 6: Takeaway Questions and Actions

Between-session assignment: Read Acts 19:11–20. Write a private response to: Where am I tempted to seek certainty, comfort, or control apart from God? No public disclosure of past involvement is required.

4 Following Christ and Engaging Our Neighbors

4.1 How should a Jesus follower respond? (Acts 19:11-20)

11 Now God worked unusual miracles by the hands of Paul, 12 so that even handkerchiefs or aprons were brought from his body to the sick, and the diseases left them and the evil spirits went out of them. 13 Then some of the itinerant Jewish exorcists took it upon themselves to call the name of the Lord Jesus over those who had evil spirits, saying, “We exorcise you by the Jesus whom Paul preaches.” 14 Also there were seven sons of Sceva, a Jewish chief priest, who did so. 15 And the evil spirit answered and said, “Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are you?” 16 Then the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, overpowered them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded. 17 This became known both to all Jews and Greeks dwelling in Ephesus; and fear fell on them all, and the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified. 18 And many who had believed came confessing and telling their deeds. 19 Also, many of those who had practiced magic brought their books together and burned them in the sight of all. And they counted up the value of them, and it totaled fifty thousand pieces of silver. 20 So the word of the Lord grew mightily and prevailed.

Primary teaching passage: Acts 19:11–20. Focus: Christ’s authority and changed practices. Other passages in this block serve as supporting references.

Time	Content	Method
0–3	Recall the previous session’s central principles.	Retrieval questions
3–10	Study Acts 19:11–20: Christ’s authority, the misuse of Jesus’ name, confession, and costly separation from former practices.	Guided Bible study
10–15	Stand firm through truth, righteousness, faith, Scripture, and prayer. Emphasize Christ’s victory and dependence on Him.	Ephesians 6:10–18; Colossians 2:13–15
15–20	Respond to someone involved: listen, clarify their beliefs, explain your allegiance to Jesus, decline participation, and offer gospel hope.	Demonstration and paired practice
20–23	Address personal involvement: stop the practice, confess to God, remove materials used for it, and seek pastoral support and ongoing discipleship.	Practical guidance
23–25	Two-question scenario check.	iSpring assessment

Table 8: Teaching Plan for Responding to Occult Involvement

4.1.1 Jesus’ Name Is Not an Incantation

Acts 19:11–17. Distinguish God’s extraordinary work through Paul from the exorcists’ attempt to employ Jesus’ name as a technique.

4.1.2 Repentance Produces Costly Separation

Acts 19:18–20. Explain confession, destruction of magical books, the financial cost, and the growth of the Lord’s word.

4.1.3 Stand in the Victory of Christ

Colossians 2:13–15; Ephesians 6:10–18. Explain Christ’s triumph and dependence on Him through truth, righteousness, faith, salvation, Scripture, and prayer.

4.1.4 Correct Others With Gentleness

2 Timothy 2:24–26. Explain the Lord’s servant’s conduct, God’s granting of repentance, and hope of release from deception.

Acts 19 supplies a useful narrative center: Jesus’ name is not an incantation, and turning to Him changes people’s practices. The account culminates in the growth of the Lord’s word. Bible Gateway

Pastoral guardrails to teach:

• Treat people with dignity; speak with gentleness rather than ridicule.
• Avoid demonstrations of occult practices and sensational accounts.
• Do not assume every unusual experience, illness, or emotional struggle is demonic.
• Direct distressed participants toward appropriate pastoral care; medical or mental-health concerns also deserve qualified care.
• Keep the focus on following Christ rather than developing a fascination with evil.

5 Dealing with Cultural Practices

5.1 Halloween Decision

1. Participation: Does this involve divination, spirit contact, spells, or religious devotion contrary to Christ?
2. Message: What does the activity celebrate, normalize, or invite me to enjoy?
3. Conscience: Can I participate with a clear conscience before God?
4. Influence: How might this affect my children, another believer, or my Christian witness?
5. Neighbor-love: How can I show kindness while maintaining faithful boundaries?

Teach clearly that Romans 14 concerns disputable matters; it does not turn explicitly forbidden practices into personal preferences. Families may reach different conclusions about ordinary costumes, candy, and neighborhood gatherings while sharing the same refusal to participate in occult practices.

5.2 Dia De Los Muertos

6 Assessment Tools and Resources

6.1 Assessment Plan

Use short questions that measure understanding and application.

Assessment	Purpose	Suggested question
Opening diagnostic	Expose misconceptions	“Is a practice spiritually safe simply because someone reports that it works?”
Session 1 quiz	Check biblical understanding	Match divination, mediumship, and sorcery with brief descriptions.
Session 2 scenario check	Practice compassionate boundaries	“A friend offers you a tarot reading. Which response combines a clear refusal with an invitation to further conversation?”
Final assessment	Test transfer to everyday life	Distinguish an explicitly prohibited practice from a matter requiring further discernment.

Table 10: Assessments and Suggested Questions

Suggested scoring: An 80% target on scored quizzes, with retries and explanatory feedback tied to Scripture. Use multiple-choice, matching, and scenario questions. Keep personal reflection questions ungraded and private.

6.2 Resources Participants Take Home

Provide a compact participant packet containing:

Resource	Contents
Guided class notes	Definitions, four teaching blocks, key conclusions, and space for questions.
Scripture reference sheet	Passages grouped under prohibition, discernment, Christ’s victory, Christian conduct, and conscience.
Halloween decision guide	The five questions above, three scenarios, and a household planning worksheet.
Pastoral response guide	Steps for leaving occult practices and a church contact for confidential conversation.
Further-reading list	Two accessible books with brief descriptions and links.

Table 11: Resources for Participants

Core Scripture references

• God’s prohibition and guidance: Deuteronomy 18:9–15; Leviticus 19:31; Isaiah 8:19–20.
• Testing spiritual claims: Deuteronomy 13:1–4; 1 John 4:1–3.
• Christ’s authority and changed allegiance: Colossians 2:13–15; Acts 19:11–20.
• Standing firm: Ephesians 6:10–18; James 4:7–8.
• Conduct and witness: 1 Corinthians 10:14–33; Ephesians 5:8–11; 2 Timothy 2:24–26.
• Conscience and consideration: Romans 14:1–6, 13–23.

6.3 Suggested books

• John Harker, Ouija Board Nightmares: The Complete Collection. This book does much to explain the origins of this device and the consequences of using it. The book does much to show that Ouija Boards are not toys and cause users to become prey to evil entities. Shadow Hills Publishing
• David Powlison, Safe and Sound: Standing Firm in Spiritual Battles. My first choice for participant reading, with its pastoral emphasis on standing firm in Christ.
• Chip Ingram, The Invisible War. A supplementary resource on Satan, demons, and spiritual warfare; his ministry also provides a related teaching series.

Review supplementary resources against Compass’s teaching before assigning selections; the Bible should remain the class’s governing authority.

7 Glossary

Term	Definition
Abomination	Something God regards as detestable because it violates His holiness and revealed will.
Astrology	A form of divination that interprets the positions and movements of celestial bodies as sources of hidden knowledge or guidance about personality, relationships, or future events.
Automatic writing	Writing produced with little conscious direction, sometimes claimed to convey messages from spirits or other unseen sources. When used to receive spirit messages, it functions as a form of mediumship.
Channeling	A form of mediumship in which someone claims to receive or communicate messages from a spirit or other spiritual entity.
Child sacrifice	The ritual offering of a child’s life to a deity or spiritual power to obtain favor, protection, prosperity, or another desired benefit.
Christian liberty	The believer’s freedom in Christ, exercised within God’s commands and with love and consideration for others.
Conscience	A person’s inward moral judgment concerning right and wrong, which needs instruction from God’s Word.
Demons	Evil spiritual beings opposed to God who seek to deceive people and resist His purposes.
Discernment	The ability to distinguish truth from error and evaluate beliefs, practices, and spiritual claims by God’s revealed truth.
Divination	Seeking hidden knowledge, predictions, or guidance through spiritual methods God forbids. Its distinguishing aim is to obtain information; sorcery seeks to produce effects, while mediumship seeks communication with spirits. These practices can overlap.
Enchantment	A spoken formula or magical practice intended to produce supernatural effects. As an instrument of sorcery, it seeks to influence people or circumstances.
Enneagram	A nine-type personality system used for self-understanding and, in some settings, spiritual guidance. This book examines its spiritual influences and the authority people give it in defining identity and directing decisions.
Familiar spirit	A spirit believed to attend or assist an occult practitioner, especially by supplying hidden information. The term identifies the supposed spiritual associate; the human intermediary is a medium or spiritist.
Idolatry	Giving worship, devotion, or ultimate allegiance to someone or something other than the true God.
Medium	A person who claims to serve as an intermediary between people and spirits. Mediumship concerns spirit communication; when that communication specifically seeks the dead, it is also necromancy.
Necromancy	Attempting to communicate with the dead to obtain information, guidance, or assistance. It is distinguished from broader spirit communication by its intended contact with deceased people.
Occult	Practices that seek hidden spiritual knowledge, supernatural effects, or contact with spirits through means God forbids. These aims include divination, sorcery, and mediumship, respectively.
Omen interpretation	A form of divination that treats events, objects, or unusual occurrences as supernatural signs revealing hidden information or directing decisions.
Ouija board	A board marked with letters, numbers, and words, used with a movable pointer to obtain messages attributed to spirits. Its use for spirit communication is mediumistic; seeking answers from the dead is necromantic.
Séance	A gathering intended to establish communication with spirits, usually through a medium. When participants seek contact with deceased people, the practice is necromancy.
Soothsaying	A form of divination in which a practitioner claims to disclose hidden information or predict future events. It overlaps with omen interpretation but does not necessarily involve reading external signs.
Sorcery	The use of magical arts to seek supernatural effects or influence people and circumstances. Its distinguishing aim is to produce an outcome, such as protection, harm, or compelled affection.
Spiritual warfare	The believer’s struggle against spiritual evil through dependence on Christ, truth, righteousness, faith, Scripture, and prayer.
Tarot cards	Illustrated cards used in divination to seek hidden information, predictions, or guidance. Their divinatory use does not necessarily include a claim of direct spirit communication.
Witchcraft	A broad term whose meaning varies with context, encompassing practices such as divination and spellcasting. In the NKJV rendering of Deuteronomy 18:10 discussed in this book, it translates a Hebrew expression referring specifically to divination.

8 Appendices

8.1 Open Promoters of the Occult

8.1.1 Laurie Cabot (Witchcraft Teacher and Author)

8.1.2 Fiona Horne (Singer and Author)

8.1.3 Gabriela Herstik (Author and Lifestyle Writer)

8.1.4 Silver RavenWolf (Wiccan Author)

8.1.5 Damien Echols (Author and Ceremonial Magic Teacher)

8.1.6 Rachel True (Actress and Tarot Author)

8.1.7 Princess Nokia (Rapper and Singer)

8.1.8 Azealia Banks (Rapper and Singer)

8.1.9 Sully Erna (Godsmack Lead Singer)

8.1.10 Kirk White (Vermont State Representative and Wiccan Author)

8.1.11 Ricky Williams (Former NFL Running Back and Astrologer)

8.2 The Occult in Music

8.2.1 Brujas (Princess Nokia, 1992 Deluxe)

8.2.2 Witch’s Rune (S. J. Tucker, Blessings)

8.2.3 Wytches (Inkubus Sukkubus, Wytches)

8.2.4 I Am a Witch (Twin Temple, Satan’s a Woman / I Am a Witch — Single)

8.2.5 Satan’s a Woman (Twin Temple, Satan’s a Woman / I Am a Witch — Single)

8.2.6 Let’s Have a Satanic Orgy (Twin Temple, Let’s Have a Satanic Orgy — Single)

8.2.7 Year Zero (Ghost, Infestissumam)

8.2.8 Ritual (Ghost, Opus Eponymous)

8.2.9 Voodoo (Godsmack, Godsmack)

8.2.10 The Ballad of the Witches (Agatha All Along – Cast, Agatha All Along: Vol. 1 (Episodes 1–5) [Original Soundtrack])

8.3 The Occult in Literature for Children and Youth

8.3.1 Teen Witch: Wicca for a New Generation (Silver RavenWolf)

8.3.2 Teen Magick (Fiona Horne)

8.3.3 The Teen Spell Book: Magick for Young Witches (Jamie Wood)

8.3.4 Elements of Witchcraft: Natural Magick for Teens (Ellen Dugan)

8.3.5 The Teen Witches’ Guide to Spells (Xanna Eve Chown)

8.3.6 The Teen Witches’ Guide to Spells & Charms (Claire Philip)

8.3.7 The Teen Witches’ Guide to Divination (Claire Philip)

8.3.8 The Teen Witches’ Guide to Tarot (Claire Philip)

8.3.9 The Teen Witches’ Guide to Palm Reading (Xanna Eve Chown)

8.3.10 The Teen Witches’ Guide to Astrology (Xanna Eve Chown and Marion Williamson)

8.3.11 How to Be a Witch (Gabrielle Balkan and Shana Gozansky)

Ages 3–6. Introduces children to contemporary witch identity and seeks to dispel stereotypes about real witches. www.penguinrandomhouse.com

8.3.12 Diary of an Accidental Witch (Perdita Cargill and Honor Cargill)

Ages 6–9. Fictional adventures presenting witch school and learning magic as humorous and appealing. PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books

8.3.13 Clever Little Witch (Muon Thi Van)

Ages 4–6. A fantasy picture book featuring a young witch attempting to transform her baby brother through spellcasting. Simon & Schuster

8.3.14 Heidi Heckelbeck Might Be Afraid of the Dark (Wanda Coven)

Ages 5–9. Features a sympathetic young witch facing an ordinary childhood fear; it is fiction, rather than instruction in occult practice.

9 References

Fountain, M. (2025, August 13). Elyse Pahler murder case: Here’s a timeline of the 1995 satanic killing in SLO County. The Tribune. https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/crime/article252167488.html

Got Questions Ministries. (2026, January 22). What are familiar spirits? GotQuestions.org. https://www.gotquestions.org/familiar-spirits.html

LeBus, M., & Harry, B. (2026, August 19). Chad Doerman says he killed his 3 sons ‘for God’ in newly released Clermont County sheriff’s video. FOX19 NOW. https://www.fox19.com/2026/08/19/ohio-father-says-he-killed-his-3-sons-god-newly-released-video/

MacArthur, J. (1973, January 14). Demons and Magic [Sermon]. Grace to You. https://www.gty.org/sermons/1218/demons-and-magic

Merrill, E. H. (1994). Deuteronomy. Broadman & Holman Publishers.

Naranjo, C. (n.d.). Claudio Naranjo—Seeker after Truth [Interview by Iain McNay; transcript]. Conscious TV. https://conscious.tv/text/49.htm

Ng, K. (2023, July 25). Raven Symone claims she can see ‘psychic’ visions like her Disney character. The Independent. https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/raven-symone-psychic-visions-disney-b2381292.html

Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. (2017, October 6). Rwalinda v Uganda [Criminal Appeal No. 03 of 2015). TIPMAP Uganda. https://www.tipmap.ug/uganda-law-library/tag/Ritual%2Bkilling

Thompson, J. A. (1974). Deuteronomy: An Introduction and Commentary. InterVarsity Press.

Wandera, D. (2026, September 11). Kiboga witchdoctor Madina Nakyeyune convicted of human sacrifice. Daily Monitor. https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/kiboga-witchdoctor-madina-nakyeyune-convicted-of-human-sacrifice-5591332

Page of 33

[1] Did Naranjo contact spirits and use automatic writing to flesh out the Enneagram? Naranjo’s student Katherine Fauvre disputes that interpretation, saying he used the phrase metaphorically for spontaneous associations informed by his psychiatric training.

[2] The end of the book Malachi begins a long period of silence. Prophecy would cease for 400 years. There would not be another prophet until John the Baptist. In the later times of the nation of Israel, especially during the quiet period, this passage (Deuteronomy 18:15-20) came to be viewed as referring to an individual. In this view the Prophet who would be raised up became a key personality in the Messianic age and was sometimes identified as the Messiah himself (cf. John 1:21, 45; 6:14; 7:40; Acts 3:20–22; 7:37, etc.). (Thompson, 1974, p. 234)

 

The Promise Keeper (Acts 18:10-13)

Previously in Missional Living…

⁹ Now the Lord spoke to Paul in the night by a vision, “Do not be afraid, but speak, and do not keep silent; ¹⁰ for I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city.” ¹¹ And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.

¹² When Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews with one accord rose up against Paul and brought him to the judgment seat, ¹³ saying, “This fellow persuades men to worship God contrary to the law.”

The Prophecy of Persecution Being Fulfilled (Acts 18:12-13) — The persuades (ἀναπείθω, ) of 18:13 has a negative connotation.

ἀναπείθω 1 aor. pass. ἀνεπείσθην (s. πείθω; Hdt. et al.; ins, pap, LXX) to move someone to do something by persuasion, induce. With an improper objective in mind… ἀ. τοὺς ἀνθρώπους incites people Ac 18:13. (Arndt et al, 2000, 3rd ed. pp. 69-70)

It is being said that Paul entices people away from the approved association of Judaism (collegium licitum) into a collegium illicitum. In this scene the sayings of Jesus have become true. Which sayings? Jesus said:

Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake (Matthew 5:11).

He also warned that His followers would be brought before governors and rulers “for My sake” (Matthew 10:17–18).

¹⁷ But beware of men, for they will deliver you up to councils and scourge you in their synagogues. ¹⁸ You will be brought before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles. (Matthew 10:17-18)

That is precisely what happens to Paul. The Jews of the city unified for a common purpose – persecute Paul and prevent further persuasive preaching about Jesus of Nazareth; with one accord they rose up against Paul (Acts 18:12). He is likely seized by his enemies as he was doing what Jesus told him to do (Acts 18:9-11). They brought the preacher before Gallio, the Roman proconsul, accusing him of persuading people to worship God contrary to the law.

Their charge reframes gospel ministry as criminal and rebellious activity. They are not merely disagreeing with Paul’s theology; they are falsely portraying the kingdom’s messenger as an evildoer. And, as Jesus predicted, the opposition arises from the synagogue—from Jewish leaders who reject Christ—though we should not generalize this to every Jew, since Crispus and others believed.

In Acts 18:12-23 we see the prophecies concerning Jesus followers and Paul in particular being fulfilled. With the prophecy is the truth about how I should regard myself in that moment: blessed. There is also the warning concerning men: beware. On account of the ministry the Jesus follower will be harshly treated and handed over to officials for condemnation. But God will make it an opportunity for testimony. Give me a summary statement for this. It has to be very concise.

When betrayed and beaten for being a witness, believe Jesus and say “I am blessed.” And when ministry begins making a difference, beware; men will by any means necessary move to make it stop.

¹⁴ And when Paul was about to open his mouth, Gallio said to the Jews, “If it were a matter of wrongdoing or wicked crimes, O Jews, there would be reason why I should bear with you. ¹⁵ But if it is a question of words and names and your own law, look to it yourselves; for I do not want to be a judge of such matters.” ¹⁶ And he drove them from the judgment seat. ¹⁷ Then all the Greeks took Sosthenes, the ruler of the synagogue, and beat him before the judgment seat. But Gallio took no notice of these things.

The Promise of Protection Being Kept (Acts 18:14-17) — The apostle to the Gentiles is ready to do the thing. After all, Jesus had said that His followers would be brought before governors and “kings as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles” (Matthew 10:18). Paul is now present before the Gentiles is their formal place of adjudicating civil matters; he can make the most of this moment and be a witness to them. aul now stands before Gallio, the proconsul of Achaia, in the formal setting where civil matters are adjudicated. This is precisely the kind of moment in which he might bear witness to Gentiles.

Jesus had also promised that when His followers were brought before rulers, they should not worry about how or what they would speak, because the Spirit would speak through them (Matthew 10:19–20). Paul is prepared to give a reason for the hope that is in him (1 Peter 3:15) and to testify concerning the truth of his ministry.

Emboldened by the vision he had received from Christ (Acts 18:9-10) and encouraged by the continued fruitfulness of his ministry, Paul is ready to present his response to the accusations. He is ready to do the thing. But Jesus has other plans.

There were Roman laws against proselytizing of Roman citizens by foreign cults, but Gallio obviously did not take the charge in this sense. He saw it for what it was—an internal dispute within the Jewish community—their interpretations of “words” (the Scriptures?), of “names” (Jesus as Messiah?), of “law” (the Torah). (Polhill, 1992, p. 388)

Gallio’s refusal to judge the matter exposes the accusation as religious hostility disguised as a legal complaint. Paul is being persecuted precisely as Jesus said His kingdom citizens would: falsely accused, opposed by religious authorities, and brought before civil rulers for the sake of Christ’s name. Also see the promise being kept: ⁹ Now the Lord spoke to Paul in the night by a vision, “Do not be afraid, but speak, and do not keep silent; ¹⁰ for I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city.” Acts 18:9-10

Notice that the endeavor to stop the ministry has been stopped, that the effort to prevent Paul’s preaching has been prevented, and that the persecutors are being persecuted. Why? A promise is being kept. No weapon formed against him will prosper.

Questions and Action Items

Question	Action Item
When I am mistreated for bearing witness to Jesus, will I remember that I am blessed?	Memorize Matthew 5:11 and respond to opposition with faith rather than retaliation.
Where must I beware of people who may oppose or hinder gospel ministry?	Identify one source of opposition and ask God for wisdom to respond with courage and discretion.
How can God use opposition against me as an opportunity for testimony?	Prepare a brief explanation of your faith and be ready to share it when an opportunity arises.
Do I trust Christ to keep His promise when opposition arises?	Write down one promise of Jesus—such as Matthew 10:18–20—and pray it back to Him when fear or resistance appears.
Where have I already seen Christ keep His word in my ministry?	Record one specific instance of His protection, provision, or guidance, and use it to strengthen your faith for the next challenge.

 

References

Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000). In A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed., pp. 69–70). University of Chicago Press.

Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 388). Broadman & Holman Publishers.