Tag Holy Spirit

The Ministry of the Spirit in Stephen (Acts 6:8-15)

⁸ And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and signs among the people. ⁹ Then there arose some from what is called the Synagogue of the Freedmen (Cyrenians, Alexandrians, and those from Cilicia and Asia), disputing with Stephen. ¹⁰ And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the Spirit by which he spoke.

The Special Abilities of Stephen (Acts 6:8) — The former mentions of signs and wonders among the people were about work done by the Spirit through the apostles (Acts 2:43; 3:1-9; 4:33; 5:12, 15). This is the first time that we hear of supernatural work being done by the Spirit through people outside of the twelve. Why? That is, (1) why were these abilities formerly only seen in the apostles and (2) what changed?

The signs, miracles, and wonders of the apostles, and Jesus before them, served to certify that they were sent by God (John 3:1-2; Acts 2:22). Think with me on the purpose of such power in the life of the Lord. Jesus pointed to the signs and wonders being done through Him when He encountered detractors. He used them to reinforce His claims when people expressed reservations about receiving a Messiah from Nazareth:

• The Works Were Given to Help Get Over Unbelief (John 10:37-38) — If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.
• The Works Were to Help Deal with Doubt (John 14:11) — Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me, or else believe Me for the sake of the works themselves.

The supernatural works being done through Jesus were aimed at helping people believe in Jesus. Through the works the Father attested to the veracity of the Son’s claims (Acts 2:22). The ministry of Jesus was validated by His miracles.

The ministry of the apostles was also validated by signs, wonders, and miracles (Hebrews 2:3-4). Through supernatural acts Jesus was made more credible. And through similar works the apostles were also validated. And so it is with the new deacons. That is, the signs and wonders serve as validation for deacons Stephen (Acts 6:8) and Philip (Acts 8:5-8). Stephen is now doing great wonders and signs among the people (Acts 6:8). In this way the new deacon is authenticated. Like Jesus and his apostles, the man upon whom the apostles have laid their hands is now being certified by miracles. Through the miracles Stephen is given a platform for promoting faith in Christ. Like Jesus and the apostles, Stephen is using the spotlight created by the miracles for declaring the word of God. And the Holy Spirit is on board with this plan; it is all part of the plan. Stephen is now someone to be regarded as having sound doctrine and speaking the words of life (Titus 1:9; 1 Timothy 3:9). And he was teaching!

The Speech of Stephen (Acts 6:9-10) — The teaching ministry of Stephen was controversial. He was saying things that disturbed both the camps of the Pharisees and the Sadducees. On account of Stephen’s teachings there arose men from five different synagogues disputing with him.

Freedmen were former slaves (or the children of former slaves) who had been emancipated by their owners; if their owners were Roman citizens, their freedmen were enrolled as members of their family. Many Jews who were taken captive to Rome at the time of Pompey’s conquest of Judaea (63 B.C.) were subsequently emancipated and thenceforth had the status of freedmen. (Bruce, 1988, p. 125)

Those who argued with Stephen were Hellenists; they were Greek-speaking Jews that were formerly dispersed among the nations. They have now come back to Jerusalem and gather according to cultural affinities.

In this verse, the term “synagogue” is singular, but Luke named five of them. First, there was the synagogue of the Libertines, a word that means “freedmen.” These were Jews who were once slaves of Rome or sons of Jewish slaves of Rome, but now had been freed. They came from Rome and built their own synagogue. Second, there was the synagogue of the Cyrenians, Jews from North Africa. Third, there was the synagogue of the Alexandrians, Jews from Egypt. The Jerusalem Talmud states that they built their synagogue at their own expense. The Babylonian Talmud tells the story of Rabbi Eliezer Ben Zadok, who acquired from some Alexandrian Jews a building formerly used as a private synagogue[ 148] “and turned it to his own use.”[ 149] Fourth, there was the synagogue of Cilicia, built by Jews who came from Asia Minor or present-day Turkey. The province of Cilicia included the city of Tarsus. Hence, these were people who came from the same region as Paul, and this synagogue of the Cilicians may very well have been his place of worship. That may also mean that he would have been involved in the disputations with Stephen and would have been among those who lost their arguments with him. Finally, there was the synagogue of Asia, meaning other parts of Asia Minor. (Fruchtenbaum, 2020, Kindle Locations 2805-2815)

But in their midst is a Hellenist full of faith and power, performing miracles, and preaching things that sound like blasphemy. They tried to take Stephen on and refute his statements. But he defeated all of them; they were not able to resist the wisdom and the Spirit by which he spoke (Acts 6:10). What is going on? Is Stephen so smart that he can best anyone in an argument? While he was likely intelligent and certainly wise (Acts 6:3), that is not why he has become unbeatable in debate. Stephen, my fellow Jesus follower, is filled with the Spirit. (See the previous post in this series.) His invincible power in verbal combat is actually the outworking of God’s presence in a chosen vessel.

• The Precedent of God’s Presence for His Servant’s Speech (Exodus 4:12; Numbers 11:17) — Between 1,300 and 1,500 years before Jesus, God told a man who was not a capable speaker that he be helped with speaking. What man? Moses. Here below is Moses’ self assessment of his speaking abilities:

O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither before nor since You have spoken to Your servant; but I am slow of speech and slow of tongue. (Exodus 4:10, NKJV)

Figure 1 – Moses protested his calling to lead based on his difficulty speaking.

Do you see it? That is, do you see Moses’ low view of his own speaking abilities? In his own words he was not eloquent. No. Instead he had some problem speaking that made his oration slow in delivery and perhaps pronunciation. Did he stammer? Whatever the problem was, in light of the help he had, it was actually not a problem. In the moment and as needed God would enable Moses to speak. His mouth was aided by the indwelling Spirit in saying what the occasion required. This is God’s response of encouragement and about the help His servant would have in speaking:

Now therefore, go, and I will be with your mouth and teach you what you shall say. (Exodus 4:12, NKJV)

• The Power is Unbeatable (Isaiah 54:17) — Between 700 and 740 years before Christ, Isaiah the prophet will add some clarity to what God will do through to make his spokespersons effective. Isaiah says that dealing successfully with opposition in our response to attacks is our heritage; when the time comes, we do not back down from the difficulty or danger associated with declaring the truth. This will be played out in the text that follows. The weapons formed against Stephen will not prosper.

“No weapon formed against you shall prosper,
And every tongue which rises against you in judgment
You shall condemn.
This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord,
And their righteousness is from Me,”
Says the Lord. (Isaiah 54:17, NKJV)

Further, instead of being condemned, the man of God will speak cutting truth about his accusers (Acts 7:54).

• The Promise of In-the-Moment Provisions of Irresistible Speech (Luke 21:12-15) — Jesus prepared his disciples for the moments when they would need to give an answer to their adversaries. He told them that they would be put on trial for the benefit of His Person and program (Luke 21:12). Jesus said those trials will look, at first glance, like a day of triumph for the enemy. However, it will be your opportunity! The Son of Man says, in effect, “What the devil would use as a time to demean you and discourage you will become a singular time of telling them the truth about who I am” (Luke 21:13); “The setback of being made to stand before your accusers will actually be a setup for you to stand for the Truth” (John 14:6).

What do we do with this? We are not far enough through the narrative of what happens to Stephen to say. Not enough of Luke’s account of the trial of Stephen has been considered. We need more to know how to operate in our day to face opposition? But here are some questions that will help us to think deeply about the text and God’s reasons for wanting us to be filled with the Spirit.

Questions for Group Discussion

1. What is the purpose of exceptional or supernatural work in the life of a believer?
2. Am I ever guilty of taking credit for what God is doing through me for His own purposes?
3. What would God have me do with the attention garnered through great work?
4. Am I preparing to use the platform occasioned by good performance to proclaim the truth about Jesus? Things that can help me to prepare for questions are (1) a time to pray for understanding, (2) a reading plan, and (3) study aimed at learning to explain the truth to others (Ezra 7:10).
5. Do I regard the company of God as sufficient equipping for everything I will face (Joshua 1:9; Matthew 28:20)? In what ways do I discount the value of God’s help? How could I be more positive about the provisions of God (Luke 21:12-15; Philippians 4:8)?

Note: The featured image for this post is of a friend and mentor — Pastor Dave Smith. One thing that Dave has taught me about being effective as a speaker is the importance of reviewing the entire message a few times before presenting. In the photo it is Sunday, 21 March 2021 and Pastor Dave is guest speaking at Communion Chapel.

Introduction

When we receive Jesus we receive pardon, we receive purpose, and we receive the Person of the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13). Once He has come gone are the days of being without power, without counsel, without comfort, without companionship (John 14:15-18). Through the Holy Spirit the Lord keeps His promise to (1) never leave us nor forsake us (Matthew 28:20; Hebrews 13:5) and (2) enable us for amazing acts of service. But with His coming also comes the unresolvable conflict that results from being indwelt by the Spirit of Christ. When the Jesus follower surrenders gladly and becomes Spirit-filled, he also becomes, from the world’s perspective, as irritating as Jesus.

While we should always endeavor to promote peace, love our enemies, and be a blessing to the community – we should not be surprised when living like Jesus brings out unavoidable angst toward us from the world. Some believers, having failed to see or accept this truth, are working in vain to make peace with the world. They have a great zeal for Jesus. But the same believer is terribly wrong in thinking that their white hot faith is compatible with a society that is surrendered to Satan and cold toward Christ. The account in Acts 6:8-8:4, with the focus on Stephen, shows us as much.

The narrative about Stephen constitutes a major turning point in Acts. It ends a series of three trials before the Sanhedrin. The first ended in a warning (4:21), the second in a flogging (5:40), and Stephen’s in his death. (Polhill, 1992, p. 183)

In the few verses under consideration we see the consequence of being Spirit-filled.

Called to Conflict (Acts 6:8)

Luke has presented the Lord and His apostles as having power to perform signs and wonders (Luke 2:40; 4:1,14-15; Acts 2:43; 5:12). Now, for the first time in the records of Luke we are hearing of wonders and signs among the people being done through someone other than the Lord or one His apostles.

[Stephen] was the first other than the apostles to be described as working miracles. (Polhill, 1992, p. 184)

A naive reading of this verse begins to cheer about this new thing: regular people of faith are doing great work. But do not miss the fact that Stephen has already been introduced as a (1) a man full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom (Acts 6:3), (2) man full of faith and the Holy Spirit (Acts 6:5). If you are mindful of his introduction the words of Acts 6:8 seem odd. You might think, “Okay. He was full of the Holy Spirit. It has been said three times. Got it!” But this third mention should make me ask if the author is trying to tell me something through the pattern of words (full of the Holy Spirit) and their rapid repetition (Acts 6:3, 5, 8). What do we find in the writings of Luke?

• Before Jesus’ Temptation in the Wilderness (Luke 4:1) – Jesus is said to be full of the Holy Spirit before He enters terrible conflict with Satan. He is victorious but certainly worn down and needed refreshing (Matthew 4:11).
• Before Jesus Rejection at Home (Luke 4:14-15) – Again Luke relates that the presence and power of the Spirit are pronounced in the man from Nazareth. This is what we are told just before Jesus’ claims cause anger in His hometown synagogue. He is successful in demonstrating the nearness of the kingdom but they try to kill him by throwing Him down over a cliff (Luke 4:28-30).
• Before Peter Preaches to the Sanhedrin (Acts 4:8-12) – These words are used before Peter indicts the court and makes one of the most inflammatory remarks of Scripture – especially to a group that had just murdered the Messiah.

It does not take a Bible sleuth to see that where these words occur in the writings of Luke, we can expect to see conflict that cannot be resolved. The Spirit-filled person was called to it! The story with Stephen is no exception. Indeed, because of the threefold mention of his filling with the Spirit we should expect unprecedented animosity.

References

Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

¹ But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession. ² And he kept back part of the proceeds, his wife also being aware of it, and brought a certain part and laid it at the apostles’ feet. ³ But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? ⁴ While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.” ⁵ Then Ananias, hearing these words, fell down and breathed his last. So great fear came upon all those who heard these things. ⁶ And the young men arose and wrapped him up, carried him out, and buried him. ⁷ Now it was about three hours later when his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. ⁸ And Peter answered her, “Tell me whether you sold the land for so much?” She said, “Yes, for so much.” ⁹ Then Peter said to her, “How is it that you have agreed together to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look, the feet of those who have buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out.” ¹⁰ Then immediately she fell down at his feet and breathed her last. And the young men came in and found her dead, and carrying her out, buried her by her husband. ¹¹ So great fear came upon all the church and upon all who heard these things.

The But of Acts 5:1 antagonizes the message of Acts 4:32-35. Where Barnabas sold his land and brought the entire proceed to the church for its use, Ananias merely claimed to do this. His sin, with Sapphira his wife, was not in keeping back part of the price of the land. Peter makes it clear that he could have done that (Acts 5:4). There would have been no fault in giving only a portion of the sale to the church. In fact, Ananias could have kept the land in his own possession without there being a problem. His contribution was not compulsory (Acts 5:3-4).

Why did he do it? He and his wife wanted to be counted with the highly committed while still keeping a foot in the world. They wanted a positive nickname too. But, with a discernment that was given to him by the Holy Spirit, Peter explains why the plan would not work:

The Seriousness of Not Seeing the Anointing — Ananias failed to acknowledge the Anointing as he acted out his trespass. Even in the presence of continuous expressions of Heaven’s power (Acts 4:33) he made the mistake of regarding men after the flesh and the fellowship as being no more than what he could see. But the men leading the fellowship were anointed by God and able to do and see things above and beyond what is possible for mere mortals. The fellowship before Ananias and Sapphira is not only with the seen but also with the unseen Spirit of the Lord. The fellowship, treated as common and something to be manipulated, was in fact consecrated. That couple was tragically unholy in dealing with a people made holy by the Spirit of Holiness.

In light of all that Ananias had seen in the way of wonders it is amazing and confounding to Peter that he could have been so dull in thinking that his sin would not be seen. How did Ananias arrive at this point? The answer is that Satan had filled his heart to lie to the Holy Spirit (Acts 5:3). Satan had been at work trying to ruin the new creation. Just as in the garden, that serpent of old (Genesis 3:1,4; 2 Corinthians 11:3; Revelation 12:9; 20:2) had been working to (1) deceive people in paradise and (2) ruin relationships. After a while the arch nemesis of God was able to convince Ananias to lie to the Spirit. What could have been worse than bringing Satan’s corrupting influence entry into the new fellowship? Ananias had allowed Satan to furnish the rooms of his heart with worldly intentions.

Doors for Demonic Activity — When we fail to take our thoughts captive (2 Corinthians 10:4-5; Philippians 4:8) and and refuse to rigorously exclude ungodly desires that would take up residence in our hearts we (1) open doors for demonic activity and (2) create conditions conducive to crimes against God and His community (Ephesians 4:25-27; Romans 12:19; James 4:7).

Action Steps — Let us stop lying and speak truth (Zechariah 8:16; Ephesians 4:15, 25; Colossians 3:9).

1. 1. Stop Active Lying – Deceptive statements
   2. Stop Passive Lying – Omissions that mislead

Peter does not punish the man but explains the great foolishness of trying to deceive God; the sin, in this case, is judged by God Himself. Upon hearing these words Ananias dies (Acts 5:5). Sapphira colludes with her husband to mislead the church. But the plan will fail with tragic results. Asked if what she brought was the entire sale price of the land Sapphira, says that it was (Acts 5:8). As in so many Old Testament cases the opportunity to confess was given. Here are ten passages from the Old Testament where God asks a question aimed at prompting confession or self-reflection:

• Genesis 3:9 – After Adam and Eve sinned, God asks Adam, “Where are you?”
• Genesis 4:9 – God asks Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?”
• Genesis 18:13 – “And the Lord said to Abraham, ‘Why did Sarah laugh, saying, ‘Shall I surely bear a child, since I am old?'”
• Genesis 21:17 – God asks Hagar, “What ails you, Hagar?”
• Genesis 32:27 – God asks Jacob, “What is your name?”
• Job 38:4 – God asks Job, “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?”
• 1 Samuel 15:14 – “But Samuel said, ‘What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?'”
• Jonah 4:4 – “Then the Lord said, ‘Is it right for you to be angry?'”
• Jeremiah 2:5 – God asks Israel, “What injustice have your fathers found in Me, that they have gone far from Me?”

These passages are instances where God’s questions are used to initiate introspection, catalyze confession, or to elicit a response that reveals deeper truths about the individuals involved. Sapphira did not make the most of her opportunity. If she had, mercy would have been shown:

He who covers his sins will not prosper, But whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy. (Proverbs 28:13)

Instead she took the opportunity to confirm her decision to test the Spirit of the Lord. What was the test?

The Test of Ananias and Saphira — Can we get away with lying about our giving in order to get a better status in our church community? Will God know?

She also dies and was carried away to be buried with her husband. Although this is bad, consider with me the consequences. Luke says that the result of this rebuke was that great fear came upon all the church and upon all who heard these things (Acts 5:11). The loss of earthly life has produced in the church a profound reverence for the presence of Christ and the position of the apostles. Christ in our midst at communion is serious; by treating it lightly we bring upon ourselves judgement. Christ at work through the leadership of the apostles is serious; by treating them as mere men the meaning of the miracles is missed and the Presence at work in them is disrespected.

Figure 1 – Signs and their Significance in the Opening of Acts

The immediate deaths of this deceptive couple were a sign indicating a spiritual reality – God does not want or tolerate lying in his church. Just as the signs of Pentecost and the fellowship prayer were not going to be repeated, the immediate deaths of liars in the church is not happening today. But the spiritual reality indicated in the narrative is that with God there is a deep displeasure associated with people in the church lying to one another and to Him. Former is unloving. The latter is dumb; He knows all. Today is the day to stop lying and start telling the truth. We should do this out of reverence for the Holy Spirit in our midst, out of caring for concern for the people that are our brother and sisters in the faith, and with the goal of protecting the quality of our witness. The whole idea of lying is from Satan the father of lies; it is what he had done from the beginning (Genesis 3:1-4). The notion should be arrested and rejected. When we fail to do that the suggestion eventually looks reasonable and becomes sin (Genesis 3:6).

Questions for Community Discussion

1. In the verses of Acts 4:32-37 we are given a general description of the character of the new community. How does Luke give us an example of that character?
2. Would you be willing to part ways with your stuff to ensure that the needs of other believers in our fellowship are met? What encouragement did they have (Acts 4:33)?
3. What explains their ability to show this level of generosity (Ephesians 4:17-21; Romans 5:5; 1 John 5:1)?
4. What was the difference between the gift of Barnabas and the gift of Ananias (Acts 4:36-37; 5:1-4)?
5. Is your giving about gratitude toward God and worship or is it about garnering praise, creating a perception of piety, and generating an image of generosity.
6. Does it matter if your presentation of an offering does not line up with the truth (John 4:24)?

7. Do you think that Ananias was saved? Consider the words of 1 Corinthians 5:5 as you formulate an answer.