Our Mission of Mercy

One author warns us against putting too much in the names that we find in Scripture.

While some have seen great significance in the meaning of “Amittai” (“truth”) and the name “Jonah” (“dove”), we must be careful not to interpret these in a way that goes beyond the book’s obvious intent. (Smith, 1995, p. 224)

Fanciful interpretations are to be avoided. Thank you, B. K. Smith. And yet care must be taken to avoid the other extremes — (1) seeing no meaning in names that have meaning (Genesis 17:9; 21:3-6; Exodus 2:10; Matthew 1:21) and (2) failing to recognize the relationship between names in the text and the clear intent of the original author. With trepidation and respect for the skills of the commentators that issue such words of caution, I submit the following.

The name Jonah (יוֹנָה) means dove. New covenant readers of this book, conditioned by the gospel accounts of Jesus’ anointing (Isaiah 11:2; Matthew 3:16; Luke 3:22; John 1:32), cannot help but to think Spirit when they encounter the word dove. Amittai (אֲמִתַּי), the name of Jonah’s father, means truth. Taken together the names form a word picture that indicates early in the text the role that Jonah has: a spirit of truth. He is a spirit of truth sent by God to a society that needs to be (i) confronted by someone they cannot ignore, (ii) convicted of sin, and (iii) converted away from violence. Insofar as God is willing to communicate His displeasure and declare the inevitable result of continuing in acts of evil, Jonah is God’s kindness, a sober warning, and a missionary of God’s mercy. And it works. Indeed, Jonah’s words will cause the city to repent and thus avoid the wrath of God; in this sense Jonah is successful as an agent of compassion. He foreshadows the compassion ministry of The Spirit of truth (John 14:17; 16:13) who now works in the world convicting it of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment (John 16:8-11).

The dove, the Spirit of Truth, that came and settled on Jesus has now settled on us (Ephesians 1:13). So then, Jesus followers are now carrying the mantle of truth bearers and have become agents of compassion. As the Father sent the Son, so now the Son sends us (John 20:21). We are sent forth to our newer Nineveh to confront with compassion the fallenness of our world and to offer the gracious gift of saving truth through the gospel.

References

Smith, B. K., & Page, F. S. (1995). Amos, Obadiah, Jonah (Vol. 19B). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

In the Aftermath of Chastening Part 2 (Acts 5:12-16)

Continuity of Miraculous Power (Acts 5:12a)

With the conjunction and of and through the apostles hands (δὲ τῶν χειρῶν τῶν ἀποστόλων) of Acts 5:12, the material following the tragedy of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11) is tied to the record of what follows (Acts 5:12-16). In effect, using the coordinating conjunction, Luke tells the reader to look at Acts 5:12-16 in light of what has just happened and to see it as a continuation of the Spirit’s work. Notice the continuity.

Do not miss the fact that the power of the apostle’s anointing continued to be at work with many signs and wonders being done among the people. Do not miss the significance of their continued ability to do miracles.

The same Spirit that was at work in the separation of the liars is still at work in the support of the leaders.

Their credentials as approved men of God and authorities to whom the people must listen were in the many signs and wonders (John 10:38; 14:11). If you were struggling with what had happened, your confidence in the apostles would be restored daily by their godly character and their great ongoing power and willingness to help others free of charge. Through the continuity of miracles through the apostles, Christ was telling the church that He continued to be at work both in and through the apostles and that He approved of the outcome with Ananias and Sapphira.

Continuity of Unified Fellowship (Acts 5:12b)

See their cohesion and oneness; the people continued to be unified as a fellowship. It says that they were all with one accord in Solomon’s Porch. In light of verse 13 the all is certainly a reference to the known congregation prior to the event of Acts 5:1-11. That same group of people, minus two, is still meeting in Solomon’s Portico or colonnade.

Figure 1: Solomon’s Porch Concept Art – Covered area with columns

Thousands of people have come to faith since Pentecost; the outpouring of the Spirit was in a room where a 120 people could meet. There are too many people to meet in the upper room mentioned in Acts 2. The apostles have taken up the practice of Jesus (John 10:23); they go to an open place in the temple to meet with the people in a ministry of teaching and miracles.

Unity remained and the custom of coming together in the temple to hear the word continued. When the Lord cleanses His community, the problem is removed, and the people continue in unity. If a church community disintegrates on account of disobedience, it may be an indicator that the Lord is removing the lampstand (Matthew 5:13-16; Revelation 2:5) of that fellowship. Unity is important and after a tragic event it must be guarded and promoted. Why is unity important?

Unity is an indispensable attribute of fellowships that will be effective as witnesses in their communities (Acts 1:8; John 13:35; 17:21) and in the work for which we were saved (Ephesians 2:10; 4:15-16 Galatians 6:2). The ongoing unity made the Jerusalem fellowship fit for witnessing to the world and the work of building up one another. Prince among preachers, Charles Spurgeon (June 19, 1834 – January 31, 1892), puts the importance of unity in perspective:

Satan always hates Christian fellowship; it is his policy to keep Christians apart. Anything which can divide saints from one another he delights in. He attaches far more importance to godly fellowship than we do. Since union is strength, he does his best to promote separation. (Spurgeon, 1868).

The events of Acts 5:1-11 (chastening or church discipline) and Acts 5:12-16 (continued power and unity) are a lesson for the modern church. We are prone to permit and tacitly promote evil when we do not take an active stand against it in our fellowships. Why? We are fearful that we will lose membership, lose financial stability, and lose our ability to reach the surrounding community. But the truth is that the compromise of not confronting and cutting out willful sinning will grieve the Spirit and hence undermine out witness. We cannot bear fruit if we do not abide in His word. Acts 5:1-16 is telling our churches to not believe the lie of losing the church if we deal with sin. The truth is that we will lose our churches if we don’t deal with willful disobedience.

Evaluate and Embrace or EliminatePeople and things that underscore the importance of unity and undertake the ongoing challenge to protect and promote Christ-centered unity in our churches are of the Spirit and missional in nature. People and things that persistently undermine church unity are demonic and are used by the devil in his dogged determination to destroy men and the mission given the local church. Take inventory church. Evaluate and embrace everything that is found to be in the first category. Eliminate with extreme prejudice everything that falls into the second and everyone that, when confronted, will not repent.

In this regard I am especially qualified to say something. My journey with Jesus has included highs in ministry and times of dealing with disobedience in ways that have been painful, public, and yet absolutely necessary for the health of the fellowship… and my own walk with God. Now I am thankful. In the handling of sin in our fellowships we cannot forget the importance of grace, gentleness, and the goal of restoration. Let nothing be done toward the sinning brother or sister that does not take into account God’s grace toward us in Christ (Ephesians 4:32); recipients of grace must not forget their own history of rebellion and the great grace that brought about their repentance. Gentleness, if possible, should be shown toward those who have failed. Only when the sinning persons demonstrates an unwillingness to repent should fellowship be shut off and interactions be limited to what is absolutely necessary. Finally, we should aim for restoration. That means, although a period of separation or being sidelined is in order, we want to see our brothers and sisters back in fellowship and using their gifts for the glory of God and the good of others. Peter failed. After a time he was restored. The brother in Corinth failed. He needed to be put out for a time. But not permanently. He needed to be restored. Restoration should become part of our stories; otherwise our churches become characterized by the false notion that the members have not messed up and that failure is unforgivable and the end of fellowship — an anti-gospel of sorts.

Questions for Consideration

  1. Is the fear of repercussions preventing your fellowship from confronting sin issues in the congregation?
  2. Does the church have a history of helping a fallen brother or sister get back up?
  3. What message does it send to the surrounding community if the person who fails is sent away permanently?

References

Spurgeon, Charles H. (1868). Lectures to My Students. Marshall, Morgan & Scott.