Tag Peter

On Purpose

Introduction

We make decisions every day about what deserves our time, whom we will trust, and what kind of people we hope to become. In college, those decisions can feel especially urgent. We choose a major, pursue relationships, and prepare for a career. Yet beneath those choices lies a question that reaches further than graduation: Who will have the authority to direct my life?

In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus brings that question into focus. He asks His disciples who they believe He is, calls them to follow Him, and teaches them what following Him requires. As they walk with Him, they discover that His purposes reach into their ambitions, challenge their assumptions about other people, and extend far beyond the boundaries of their familiar world.

Our first message, The Commitment (Matthew 16:13–27), begins with Peter’s confession that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. But Peter soon discovers that confessing Jesus’ identity and accepting Jesus’ direction are not the same thing. The Lord he rightly identifies announces a cross he strongly resists. Jesus then calls every disciple to surrender the right to govern life independently of Him.

Our second message, The Commandment (Matthew 9:1–13), shows us the mercy that must shape that surrendered life. The One who commands us to love God and our neighbor demonstrates His heart toward people burdened by sin and dismissed by others. He forgives, calls Matthew to follow Him, and shares a table with sinners. In His company, we learn to see people as those He came to call and restore.

Our final message, The Commission (Matthew 28:16–20), brings us before the risen Jesus. The disciples gathered there are still imperfect, and some doubt. Yet Jesus entrusts them with making disciples of all nations, grounding their mission in His authority and sustaining it with His presence.

The movement of these messages is from confession to commitment, from commitment to compassion, and from compassion to commission. Together, they show how recognizing who Jesus is reshapes whose purposes we pursue, how we treat people, and what we do with the life He has entrusted to us.

The Great Commitment

The Great Commitment (Matthew 16:13-27)

13 When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, saying, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?” 14 So they said, “Some say John the Baptist, some Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” 15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

18 And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” 20 Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ.

21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day. 22 Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!” 23 But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”

24 Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me. 25 For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. 26 For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 27 For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works.

The Revelation of the Person (Matthew 16:13-17) – We are now nearing the end of Jesus’ endeavor (1) to make fishers of men, (2) to make known the will of God through signs and teaching, and (3) to call the Jews to Himself and the mission of God in the world. By this time His offer of the kingdom has been rejected by the leaders of the people and His attempts to reveal the will of God have been largely misunderstood or ignored by the multitudes. Jesus reveals the state of his efforts through an assessment. Using a few questions he uncovers the great lack of understanding among the masses, the insights of the men he has been mentoring, the reason why some have realized the truth, and who he really is.

When Jesus asks his disciples about the crowds comprehension of his identity, he is not getting the information for Himself. He knows all men and has no need that anyone should testify of what was in man; he is asking for the sake of the disciples. In their answers it becomes clear that the multitudes are not getting it. “Some say you are John the Baptist.” But, by this time John the Baptist is dead. Furthermore this does not make sense when we consider that Jesus and John were contemporaries. Indeed sometimes they were in the same place at the same time. So, how could men say this? The answer is both appalling and simple; they do not get it. Others were saying that Jesus was Elijah. They saw in the ministry of the Son of Man the fulfillment of prophecies saying that Elijah would return before the coming of the Messiah. Jesus, like the Elijah of old, called people to repentance and was mighty in deed. But saying that Jesus is Elijah was to either be ignorant of the message of John the Baptist or to reject it. John said that Jesus was the Son of God and the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Whether they did not know what John had said or missed that Jesus taught with an authority befitting the Christ, they reason is the same. They do not get it.

Finally, some said that Jesus was Jeremiah or one of the prophets (Luke 9:19). Although there were prophecies foretelling a time when Elijah would come to prepare the way before the Christ, nothing in the Law or the Prophets said that Jeremiah was coming back. This theory seems to be the outworking of a misreading of extrabiblical material (2 Maccabees 15:12-16; 2 Maccabees 2:4-8). In any case, what becomes obvious is that there not only are the people not getting it, some are farther from getting it than others.

The question is a catalyst for comprehension and a tool for pushing insights into the heads of his disciples. Jesus wanted his men to marvel at what had not happened in the multitude. He wanted his closest and hand-picked followers to realize that among men there was a range of misunderstanding about His identity. Through the inquiry he instigates seeing that the people cannot see.

And their Rabbi is not done. He wants them to observe another thing, to acknowledge and appreciate the grace of God on their lives, and know why they know what others do not. That there is a significant difference between the disciples and the crowd is already known to Jesus. He wants them to know it as well. Do not miss the But of Matthew 16:15. Through the conjunction the disciples are presented a contrast, an lack likeness, and a dissimilitude. All the disciples are given the question, “But who do you say that I am?”

It should come as no surprise that Peter responded for the rest of the disciples. He was created and called to lead the other men. His nature is to step up, to speak up, and to get out of the boat. That is what he is doing now and will continue to do throughout his life. Hear the answer of the big fisherman: You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. And now comes the assessment and explanation of Peter’s understanding and explanation: Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

If they have considered the answer to the prior question they can readily appreciate what Jesus says about Peter’s understanding. They were supposed to see that the crowds of people from all walks of life were not able to to make sense of what they were seeing in Jesus. But somehow Peter did. Why? The answer is that Peter or Simon Bar-Jonah is blessed. Flesh and blood did not reveal or disclose this to the Galilean. His brain or intellect is not the cause for Peter’s right answer. Smarter people were not getting it. People with a lot more training in the Scriptures and powerful intellects were not able to make sense of Jesus. And neither was Peter. Jesus’ Father who is in heaven had intervened to make it known to Peter what people could not get on their own.

People, without a special work of God, cannot get this on their own! Now, O Disciples, in light of the total and various misunderstandings of the multitude, see that Peter’s perception born out of a blessing from above, a loving act of the Almighty, and a grace that gets for Man what he cannot get for himself.

The Great Confiding (Matthew 16:18-20) — Do you see the conjunction And at the beginning of Matthew 16:18? Having revealed that the disciples are different and that their company has uncommon insight, Jesus goes on to tell them why. What Jesus says next is to be viewed as part of the earlier revelation. He says, And I say to you (singular) in order to unveil more of what Peter has come to comprehend. In particular, Peter’s understanding is presented by Jesus as having purpose in the undertaking of building a community created and called out for God. He says what He says to Peter in front over everyone so that there will be no debate later on about where the big fisherman stands. Jesus has, by the great grace of the Father, appointed Peter to a special position for a special work:

  • you are Peter – Jesus was speaking to the disciples in Aramaic. Although Matthew has made the narrative available to us in Greek, in Aramaic Jesus told Peter that he is Cephas (John 1:41-42). The name Cephas means stone. Simon Bar-Jonah, you are a stone. Although the Galilean fisherman will be unreliable and unable to keep his promises, he will become steadfast and immovable. Jesus speaks Simon Bar-Jonah about his future not his failings.
  • on this rock – There is much debate about the meaning of this rock () . However, because (1) the word changes from petros to petra and (2) because Jesus says that He is continuing from what Peter said earlier, this rock is best understood as Jesus Himself. The context and earlier confession show this to be true.
  • I will build my church – The church is not built on creeds or Peter. It is built on the truth. What truth? Jesus is the Truth upon which His church (ekklesia) is built. Three things are clear. First, the building of the church is being done by Christ; we must never forget that. Although men and women may be used by God to establish discipleship communities, the work is being done by Jesus Himself through them. He receives all the glory. Second, the church is built over time. The local communities that are made by Jesus start small but are being built up by the Lord. Do not despise small beginnings. Even a mustard seed community, if Christ is in it, is growing according to his plan and power. Third, the community of Christ is not of this world. It is created to be eclectic (ekklesia) and non-conformist.
  • the gates of Hades will not prevail against it – The gates of Hades, for these Jewish men is a way of talking about death. They would not have used the word Hades; that is the Greek translation of a the Jewish word Sheol (). Notice how the term is used in the Psalms and by the prophet Isaiah.
Reference Passage excerpt Context and significance
Isaiah 38:10 “I shall go to the gates of Sheol” Hezekiah anticipates dying. The Septuagint renders gates of Sheol as gates of Hades, providing the closest verbal parallel to Matthew 16:18. Gates of Sheol would be the way it would stated in Hebrew.
Job 38:17 “the gates of death” God questions Job about his knowledge of death’s domain, emphasizing the limits of human understanding.
Psalm 9:13 “lift me up from the gates of death” The psalmist identifies God as the One who can rescue him from impending death.
Psalm 107:18–20 “gates of death” Afflicted people approach death, cry to God, and receive His deliverance.

These passages establish death and the realm of the dead as the background of the expression gates of Hades. Isaiah’s Septuagint wording makes the Sheol–Hades connection particularly explicit. Jesus is here alluding to the fact that even His own eminent death will not succeed in stopping this work. The death of the Builder will not stop the building.

Peter is then declared to have special authority in the building program of Jesus: I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Keys are used to open and deny access. Jesus says that Peter will be given special authority in the unseen kingdom of heaven to open doors (whatever you loose) and close doors (whatever you bind). The kingdom is no longer being offered to the nation; they have rejected the offer (). Therefore there is no point in telling people that Jesus is the Christ. So Jesus commanded His disciples that they should tell no one.

The fisherman has learned that his unusual understanding is a gift from the Father. Now he discovers that his privileged understanding carries a purpose: he has been given a place in the work of Christ. Jesus will build His church, death will not defeat His undertaking, and Peter will exercise the authority Jesus entrusts to him under Jesus’ direction. Peter is being called into a life that is unapologetically Christ-centered.

The next revelation will test whether Peter is as willing to follow Christ’s plan as he is to confess Christ’s person.

The Revelation of the Plan and the Problem (Matthew 16:21-23) – Going forward Jesus began to show His disciples things that had formerly only been mentioned in allusions (John 2:19; Matthew 9:15; Matthew 12:39-40). Now He makes them plain to His men and women. (Although the term disciples often means the twelve, sometimes it refers to the larger group of people that were following him. The women were also made aware of what lay ahead. The angel that meets them at the tomb explained that they should not expect the living among the dead because He, as He said, is risen.) What did Jesus show His disciples? Only what the Scriptures had already said concerning the Christ:

What Jesus Was Showing Old Testament Support Connection to Matthew 16:21
He must go to Jerusalem. Zechariah 12:10 — Jerusalem mourns the pierced one. Connects His piercing with Jerusalem; does not explicitly predict the journey.
He must suffer many things. Isaiah 53:3–7 — The Servant suffers rejection, wounds, and oppression for others’ sins. His suffering fulfills God’s saving purpose.
He must suffer through the elders, chief priests, and scribes. Psalm 118:22 — The builders reject God’s chosen cornerstone. Jesus applies this rejection to Israel’s leaders in Matthew 21:42–45.
He must be killed. Isaiah 53:8–9, 12 — The Servant dies and is buried. Daniel 9:26 — The Messiah is cut off. Anticipates His death; Isaiah explains its sin-bearing purpose.
He must be raised. Psalm 16:10 — God’s Holy One escapes abandonment to Sheol and decay. Isaiah 53:10–12 — Life and victory follow the Servant’s death. Peter explicitly applies Psalm 16 to Jesus’ resurrection in Acts 2:25–32.
He must be raised on the third day. Jonah 1:17; 2:10 — Deliverance follows three days inside the fish. Hosea 6:2 — Israel anticipates third-day restoration. Jesus applies Jonah’s pattern to Himself in Matthew 12:40. Hosea provides an indirect parallel.

Peter is prompted by what he has heard and pulls his Rabbi away for a brief word. Once they were away from the group, the Son of Jonah begins to refute the plan and rebuke the Son of God. Do not get caught up in the wrong of Peter’s action; his audacity reveals an underlying problem. The action of rebuking of Jesus is not the sickness; it is merely a symptom. Who corrects Christ? Someone with a wrong view of (1) himself, (2) Christ, and (3) the mission. Peter’s mental preoccupation is with worldly concerns, secular things, and matters that are no more than the ambitions of mere men.

Jesus has recently commended Peter for his confession. Actually he pointed out that Peter has been the recipient of a great grace from God; that is how he came to see that Jesus is the Christ and the Son of God. Now he speaks with emotional contempt for what he is hearing and the heart behind it. Peter does not know it, but he has aligned himself with God’s greatest adversary – Satan. In fact, the man upon whom there is a great calling for good is in this moment and instrument of evil and arch antagonist to the agenda of God through the Christ. Who had tried to thwart the plan of redemption earlier? Satan had (Matthew 4:8-10). Now that serpent of old () was at work through a disciple to deter the Son of Man from the plan to save His people from their sins. There is a lesson in this. And we do well to stop and think on it.

The goals of the godly do not necessarily come from God. They must be examined in light of the revealed will of God to ascertain whether they are contributing to or conflicting with the call of Christ. Peter’s problems are not difficult to see. First, He elevated Himself from disciple to The Director of God’s Son. Second, he prioritized his own preferences above God’s plan.

The Revelation of the Price and Prize (Matthew 16:24-27; John 12:25) – Jesus turns to the disciples to speak a word they all need to hear. Peter’s problem is also theirs. And ours. Although only Peter had the audacity to actually rebuke Jesus, he was not alone in his way of thinking. He is every man that means well but whose mind has not been renewed. He is all of us that have become committed Christ followers but have not fully parted ways with worldly ambitions. Just like Peter we are found trying to manipulate the Messiah, rebuke the Redeemer, and convince the Christ to go with our plan. After all, our plan does some good and avoids inconvenience and suffering while allowing us to have a great time. Such plans promote the planner and demote Jesus Christ to the role of Tonys Stark’s Jarvis. Jesus takes a moment to explain the way it is going to work for anyone who is going to follow Him.

I want to be a Jesus follower! Do you? Jesus says His followers are not able to go around the things that He goes through. He denied Himself worldly pleasures. It is not possible to follow Jesus and indulge my own appetites… especially when they are in conflict with the commandments of God. There has to be an unconditional willingness to surrender my plan, set aside my preference, and take up my cross. Cross? Wait, Roderick. What cross? When did I get my own cross? Read the passage again. Jesus says that His follower has to take up his cross, and follow Me. An indispensable element of following Jesus is the cross. It is a non-negotiable component of coming to Christ. That is what he said. But then, what is my cross. It is likely not a literal wood structure with two beams joined at 90 angles on which you will eventually be hung. (This is not certain. A literal crucifixion is still in view for some Jesus followers.) The cross as a concept is all of the suffering that is inseparable from doing God’s will, all of the persecution from people that comes obedience, and all of the dying daily that happens when what I want dies. Why would I do that? That is, why would I carry a cross? Trying to be happy the world’s way will lead to tragic loss. In the end those who gains all the world has to offer will have rejected the will of God and forfeit their souls.

No worldly gain can compensate for the loss of my soul, and no sacrifice for His sake escapes His notice. Will I spend my life trying to make Jesus serve my ambitions, or surrender my ambitions to follow Jesus?

Questions and Action Items

Questions for Reflection Action Items
Who do I say Jesus is—and does my life agree with my confession? (Matthew 16:13–17) State your answer personally. Identify one area where your choices contradict what you confess about Him.
How am I using what God has revealed and entrusted to me to serve Christ’s purposes? (Matthew 16:18–20) Name one way you can use your time, abilities, or relationships to strengthen His church. Commit to a specific step this week.
Where am I asking Jesus to approve my plan while resisting His revealed will? (Matthew 16:21–23) Bring one ambition, relationship, or decision before God. Examine it in light of Scripture and surrender whatever conflicts with His direction.
What obedience am I avoiding because it will cost me comfort, approval, or opportunity? (Matthew 16:24–25) Identify the cost you have been avoiding. Take one concrete step of obedience within the next seven days.
Am I pursuing something that looks profitable now but will prove worthless when Christ returns? (Matthew 16:26–27) Review one major priority in your calendar or spending. Make a change that reflects the lasting value of faithfulness to Christ.

Before you leave, complete this statement: “Because Jesus is the Christ, I will surrender __________ and take this step of obedience: __________.”

Share that commitment with a trusted believer and ask them to follow up with you this week.

Will I spend my life trying to make Jesus serve my ambitions, or surrender my ambitions to follow Jesus?

The Great Commandment

The Great Commandment (Matthew 9:1-13; Matthew 22:34-40)

9:1 So He got into a boat, crossed over, and came to His own city. 2 Then behold, they brought to Him a paralytic lying on a bed. When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, be of good cheer; your sins are forgiven you.” 3 And at once some of the scribes said within themselves, “This Man blasphemes!” 4 But Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said, “Why do you think evil in your hearts? 5 For which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven you,’ or to say, ‘Arise and walk’? 6 But that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins”—then He said to the paralytic, “Arise, take up your bed, and go to your house.” 7 And he arose and departed to his house. 8 Now when the multitudes saw it, they marveled and glorified God, who had given such power to men.

9 As Jesus passed on from there, He saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax office. And He said to him, “Follow Me.” So he arose and followed Him.

10 Now it happened, as Jesus sat at the table in the house, that behold, many tax collectors and sinners came and sat down with Him and His disciples. 11 And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to His disciples, “Why does your Teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” 12 When Jesus heard that, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. 13 But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice.’ For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”

The Example and Proof (Matthew 9:1-8)

Jesus Makes the Most of His Moments (Matthew 9:1; Mark 2:1-2) — Jesus has recently been asked to leave a place where He has delivered two men from demon-possession (Matthew 8:33-34). What does He do when asked to leave? He leaves. That is, Jesus departed from the country of the Gergesenes, got into a boat, crossed the sea of Galilee, and came to His own city (καὶ ἦλθεν εἰς τὴν ἰδίαν πόλιν).

His own city is no longer Nazareth; Jesus has been ousted from there (Luke 4:16, 28-30). The Son of Man now resides in Capernaum (Mark 2:1). Outside of Nazareth Jesus is regarded favorably and news of His presence in Capernaum draws a crowd. In the crowd are Pharisees and teachers of the law; they have come from the regions of Galilee, Judea, and the city of Jerusalem (Luke 5:17). And the moment is seized; He preached the word to them (Mark 2:2). His time is short and He does not want to waste a second of it. His agency is used to help people; His urgency leads him to use His moments for the long run and with a view toward eternity. Jesus, my fellow followers, is an opportunist; He uses gatherings to advance the understanding of the people that have come to Him in matters of the kingdom of God and living effectively.

Question: Am I like Jesus to the people that come to me? That is, am I using my free will and my limited time to make the most of moments with others? Do I share what I can about the kingdom of God and spiritual truths so that people can live effectively in the service of the Lord and others?

Bringing People to Jesus (Matthew 9:2) — Matthew says, “Look at this, reader! They brought to Jesus a paralytic lying on a bed.” The behold (ἰδού) calls the reader to look at what is being said with the intent of looking seriously and how it matters in two things: (1) the argument of the writer and (2) the application of what is being said to the reader’s life. In Matthew’s attempt to convince the reader that Jesus is the long-awaited Messiah-King, he repeatedly draws attention to the fact that some people came to the conclusion that with Jesus there is hope for people otherwise considered hopeless (the man full of leprosy – Matthew 8:1-4; the Centurion’s servant – Matthew 8:5-13; the woman with the flow of blood – Matthew 9:20-22; Jairus’ seeking help for his daughter – Matthew 9:18-26; two blind men – Matthew 9:27-31; and more). Four men have come to regard their paralyzed friend as having a chance to become well. We learn from Mark that they are not daunted by the fact that they cannot get through the crowd. These uncouth men of faith will not be denied; they tear a whole in the tiling of the roof of the home and let their paralyzed friend down through the hole (Mark 2:3-4; Luke 5:18-19).

Questions: Do I regard my friends as having real hope in Christ? What am I bringing them to? How determined am I to bring them to Jesus? Will I stop trying if it becomes inconvenient?

Jesus, seeing their faith, is moved to deal with the problems of the paralytic. Here is where things get interesting. The healing they are seeking is temporary. Where there is genuine faith Jesus is more concerned with the more serious matter of unforgiven sin. Paralysis as a problem pales compared to the lack of pardon for crimes against God. The wages of sin is death (Romans 3:23). Our value system is often most concerned with the inconvenience of ill health, the setback of sickness, or the pain caused by disease in our body or relationships. But in the economy of God my biggest problem is not failing health but my need for forgiveness and reconciliation to Himself. Failing health is an inevitable consequence of being human in this world; if it is fixed by Jesus… it is going to fail again. But forgiveness and favor with God benefits me now and for all eternity. Jesus came into this world to deal with the biggest problem that man faces – sin (Matthew 1:21). Jesus says that the paralytic can be of good cheer or encouraged because his sins are forgiven him.

The Authority of Jesus (Matthew 9:3; Mark 2:7; Luke 5:21) — Matthew calls to the reader’s attention the inner dialogue of the scribes. And he does it again with behold (ἰδού). (It is unfortunate that the NKJV translates this as at once. ESV and KJV are consistent in this regard and render the underlying text as behold. The NET Bible and NLT do not translate it at all.) By using this word Matthew says that his argument about who Jesus is advanced; it is seen why this helps his argument when we put verse 3 with 4. I believe that the passage should read like this:

3 And behold some of the scribes said within themselves, “This Man blasphemes!”

What did they say to themselves? They said within themselves, “This Man blasphemes!” Matthew would have me to know that the statement of Jesus drew a very critical reaction from religious experts. Why?

Sin is first and foremost against God. Even when it immediately hurts others, it is a work against the God who made the others for Himself. David says as much when he summarily describes his sin against Uriah the Hittite, Bathsheba the wife of Uriah, and the people that he had conscripted to help with his trespass (2 Samuel 12:13).

4 Against You, You only, have I sinned,

And done this evil in Your sight—

That You may be found just when You speak,

And blameless when You judge. (Psalm 51:4)

It stands to reason that forgiveness of sin against God can only be granted by God. That is, it is not logical that someone other than God Himself could grant me forgiveness for the ways that I have wronged God Himself. With this in mind, Jesus’ statement is outrageous. If He is merely a man, this is beyond arrogance. It is blasphemy — a bold disrespect and disregard for who God is and the difference between the domain of man and the domain of God!

6 And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, 7 “Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?” (Mark 2:6-7)

They are not wrong theologically? That is, their rhetorical question is the right one; it points up the fact that a mere man cannot pardon a person for sin against God. The problem is in their failure to realize who Jesus is. He is going to deal with that now.

The Powers of Perception of the King (Matthew 9:4; Psalm 139:2; 1 Samuel 16:7; John 2:23-25) — In their hearts they reacted immediately. In their hearts they reacted critically. In their hearts they started with the assumption that Jesus did not have the authority to forgive sin. This was an outworking of their prior unwillingness to accept the testimony and ministry of John (Matthew 21:23-25). Their failure to receive the full import of what had been said by John (John 1:15,29-34) was now manifest in a way-too-low view of Jesus.

But let us think for a moment on the statement itself. First, we are looking at a bold statement. Second, let us note that it is in the passive voice: your sins are forgiven you. Third, we should take into account that this statement was made by a Jew to other Jews; that means it was said in Hebrew. Putting these three things together

statement: your sins are forgiven you + passive voice + Hebrew

We have a statement that was familiar to the scribes. Fruchtenbaum helps us here:

The Hebrew form of the passive, your sins are forgiven you, is used only in one section of the entire Hebrew Bible: in Leviticus 4-6. The context of these chapters is atonement, as they detail the blood sacrifices necessary for the forgiveness of sins. The statement of forgiveness in a passive voice followed the sacrifice (e.g., Lev. 4:20, 26, 31, 35; 5:10, 13, 16, 18; 6:7). …[T]he Hebrew word for “forgiveness,” salach (סָלַח), is used of God. The passive means that God is doing the forgiving. Being Pharisees, these people knew both the Torah and Hebrew, and they caught the connection He was making. He was claiming the authority that God asserted for Himself in Leviticus 4-6: that by means of blood atonement, God had forgiven their sins. … Yeshua was, therefore, speaking as if He were God. (Fruchtenbaum, 2017, p. 186)

Jesus begins having conversation with His critics about the meditations of their hearts (John 2:23-25; Psalm 19:14).

14 Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart

Be acceptable in Your sight,

O Lord, my strength and my Redeemer. (Psalm 19:14)

The Pharisees started with the assumption that Jesus was sinning. Their theology was correct. Their problem, though, was a small view of Messiah and failure to accept the testimony of John the Baptist (Matthew 21:23-25).

Question: Are there truths or testimonies that I have refused to receive that are making it hard for me to accept what God is showing me?

The Proof of the King (Matthew 9:5-6) — Jesus knows their thoughts and addresses their concern. He does this with an argument a fortiori. That is, he proves His claim that the sins are forgiven by demonstrating something that can be seen. We are apt to separate the say from the fulfillment; that was not the case with the people in this narrative (Ezekiel 12:28; Numbers 23:19). To them the saying and the fulfillment are one and the same. Thus, the easier thing to say, because it is does not require immediate validation, is “Your sins are forgiven you?” So then, Jesus takes on the harder thing as proof that the easier thing has been accomplished. It would have been to them immediate proof that the easier thing to say was true and that the man’s sins were forgiven.

All of this was done that they would “know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins.” By using the phrase Son of Man the Rabbi from Nazareth is claiming to be the figure of Daniel’s prophecy:

13 “I was watching in the night visions,

And behold, One like the Son of Man,

Coming with the clouds of heaven!

He came to the Ancient of Days,

And they brought Him near before Him.

14 Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom,

That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him.

His dominion is an everlasting dominion,

Which shall not pass away,

And His kingdom the one

Which shall not be destroyed.

Daniel 7:13-14, approximately 550 BC

This is not an emphasis of His humanity but His deity; the Son of Man in Daniel’s vision receives worship (Daniel 7:14). When Jesus refers to Himself using this phrase He is claiming to be the enigmatic character that Daniel saw receiving glory, a kingdom, and worship with the approval of the Ancient of Days. Jesus then gives the command to the man to “Arise, take up your bed, and go to your house?”

Who is Going to Fix This Roof (Matthew 9:7) — The man did just as Jesus directed him. He departed to his own house glorifying God (Luke 5:25). We can imagine the looks on the faces of the people as the man, who came in through a whole in the roof with the aid of four men, left through the door carrying his own bed. But let us not miss the meaning of the walking man. His walking was working to advance the more important point – his sins were forgiven.

When the Walk Wins People Over (Matthew 9:8) — Jesus had proven His claim. The paralytic was gone; in his place was a man that could carry his own bed. His walk was winning people over. Thus, they now know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins. This was the conclusion of the multitudes: God had given such power to men.

Question: Do I accept that Jesus has the authority to forgive me and free me from the power of indwelling sin (John 8:36)? Do I regard myself as forgiven of the sins of the past? Or am I still trying to work off my debt? Is my perspective that I am free from the power of sin, or am I living in a stalemate with behaviors and ways of thinking that are contrary to the will of God?

Our walk matters more than we are willing to accept. In our walk we become witnesses to the work of God in our lives. The change in us is a sign that says He saves. (In our walk is evidence that either confirms or denies my convictions about Christ.) A changed walk confirms that I am convinced that I am free from the power of indwelling sin and called to live for Him that died for me. A lack of change indicates either that I am not convinced or that I am not converted. After receiving Christ I will not be sinless; but I should begin sinning less as I learn to walk in my (1) healing, (2) freedom, and (3) what it means to follow Jesus.

The Example and Program (Matthew 9:9)

Calling the Outcast (Matthew 9:9) — Jesus has just finished fixing a man both physically and spiritually. With a word the Son of Man (Matthew 9:6; Daniel 7:13-14) restored a paralytic to wholeness. So well was the man that he walked carrying his bed out of a room that he moments ago had to be lowered into. More importantly, Jesus set the man right with God (Matthew 9:2); that is why He came (Matthew 1:21). It was outlandish and outstanding at the same time. Outlandish that a Man would have the audacity to tell someone that his sins were forgiven. Outstanding that He could actually do it (Matthew 9:6,8). The rabble rousing Rabbi passed on from there (Matthew 9:9). As He does He passes the tax office or place of the toll (τὸ τελώνιον) and notices a man named Matthew sitting there.

Matthew also goes by the name Levi (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27). We commonly refer to him as a publican (from the Latin publicanus) or tax collector. There are two types of publicans. One collects taxes on income. The other collects taxes or tolls on people traveling through ports or official travel routs. Matthew is a tax collector of the sort that collects money on boats going across the lake outside of Herod’s territory or from people going from Damascus to the coast (Robertson, 1933).

Although Matthew is a Jew, he is hated by Jewish society because he is regarded as a sellout and collaborator with the nation’s oppressors — the Romans. Tax collectors had military support in the collection of taxes from the Jews; they had the help of soldiers in making a great living from their Jewish brethren. Everything that a tax collector could collect above what was due was his own.

Tax collectors earned a profit by demanding a higher tax from the people than they had prepaid to the Roman government. This system led to widespread greed and corruption. The tax-collecting profession was saturated with unscrupulous people who overtaxed others to maximize their personal gain. According to Adams, “The toll-collectors were in a profession that was open to dishonesty and oppression of their neighbor” (Adams, The Sinner in Luke). Since the Jews considered themselves victims of Roman oppression, Jewish tax collectors who overtaxed their fellow countrymen were especially despised. Jews viewed such favor for Rome as betrayal and equal to treason against God. Rabbinic sources consistently align Jewish tax collectors with robbers. (Miller, 2016)

The profession, although held in low regard by religious leadership, was not inherently wrong. When tax collectors came to John the Baptist for baptism, the voice in the wilderness did not direct them to abandon their work. They were told to do their work without the wickedness of getting more than what was right:

12 Then tax collectors also came to be baptized, and said to him, “Teacher, what shall we do?” 13 And he said to them, “Collect no more than what is appointed for you.” (Luke 3:12-13)

Notice that Jesus’ call on Matthew was not complicated (Matthew 4:19; 8:22; 19:21; John 1:43; 12:26; 21:22). There is no ceremony and no formalities. Lacking in the call of Jesus, when compared to modern methods of getting people into ministry today, was sophistication or contracts. We have often added too much. The call to follow Jesus was just that – a call to follow Jesus. Faith is all that was required. What kind of faith? The kind that believes that everything is going to be okay when leaving everything behind (Luke 5:28). That kind of faith, beloved.

Let us marvel at Matthew’s response; it is remarkable. Although he was regarded as a wretched human being, given the opportunity, he was ready to leave everything behind to be with Jesus (Luke 5:28).

The call was simple. It was not to a formal membership class, not to a denomination, or an ascetic lifestyle. It was a call by the Savior to Himself. Jesus summoned a sinner that everyone loved to hate into fellowship with Himself. The decision to follow Jesus is first, foremost, and forever a personal call to just Jesus.

𝕋𝕙𝕣𝕖𝕖 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 ℕ𝕖𝕖𝕕𝕖𝕕 𝕥𝕠 𝔹𝕖𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕖 𝕄𝕠𝕣𝕖 𝔼𝕗𝕗𝕖𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕚𝕟 𝔻𝕚𝕤𝕔𝕚𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕤𝕙𝕚𝕡

① Sanctification of the Caller (John 17:9) – The person calling has to be willing to let things go in order to become an effective mentor. In addition to a commitment to a consecrated life (holiness), there must be a willingness to eliminate people and things that distract us from discipleship. The person that is going to call others to Christ, to be maximally effective, must cut away everything that hinders in the work of helping others to walk with Jesus.

② Simplification of the Call (Matthew 4:19; 8:22; 19:21; John 1:43; 12:26; 21:19, 22; Luke 9:59) – The call cannot be complicated. It is not a call to circumcision, a certain style of worship, joining an organization, or accepting a title. Effective discipleship occurs when we focus on calling people to follow Jesus. That is all! When we add other qualifications, although well-meaning, we weigh people down with traditions and man-made religion.

③ Nurture and Nourish the Called (John 21:17; 1 Peter 2:2) – The person being called may have the faith to follow. But they will certainly lack almost everything else. Effective discipleship happens when we are longsuffering like Jesus in nurturing followers into maturity. It is painstaking work that involves discouraging setbacks, conflict, and the need to persevere through big problems. It is spiritual work. Feed them the word and help them see how it relates to the relationship with Jesus.

The Example and Point (Matthew 9:10-13)

The Consequence of Calling the Outcast (Matthew 9:10) — In humility Matthew does not make mention of who owned the house. We have to look at parallel accounts to discover that the dwelling belongs to the tax collector (Mark 2:15; Luke 5:29) and that the feast, a party that included his friends, was thrown by Matthew for Jesus. In his recounting of the event for the reader Matthew calls to the readers attention the kind of people that came and sat down with [Jesus] and His disciples — many tax collectors and sinners (καὶ ἰδοὺ πολλοὶ τελῶναι καὶ ἁμαρτωλοὶ). Look at this, says Matthew. It was shocking to see someone considered to be righteous and a teacher sitting with people hated and not allowed into normal fellowship. They were not at the door but they were sitting down with Jesus and His disciples.

The consequence of calling Matthew matters to us as we attempt to make disciples today. In this particular event is a timeless principle and strategy for reaching those who need Christ most: those who would be good fishers of men must see that the well-loved outcast is a lure for lost men of the same kind.

This was the plan all along: use somebody to reach others.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRgFeZa_I48

The Reaction of the Religious (Matthew 9:11) — Notice the reaction of religious people. They are unable to understand Jesus. He is outside. Of what? Outside of their model of unhealthy ministry, their puritanical focus on rules, and their condescending attitude toward people who need help. They are looking at what Jesus is doing but cannot make sense of it. Why?

Pharisees don’t see. They don’t see the value of people that have lost their way. They don’t grieve over the great tragedy of a soul that rejects God’s right to reign. Pharisees, both then and now, are beset by a blindness that makes that unable to understand the undertaking of showing mercy and kindness in the mission of promoting reconciliation to God.

The Pharisee in you and me is all too ready to be rid of what we don’t like regardless of what God wants.

Answering the Critics (Matthew 9:12) — They put the question to the disciples. Jesus heard (ὁ δὲ ἀκούσας) and put the answer to the critics themselves. He is not running from the question or using intermediaries to answer His critics; Jesus is not afraid of them. He is saying more than one thing with this statement. First, those who are well are the spiritually healthy. Those who are well are those who are walking with God and enjoying fellowship with Him and His people. Jesus did not come to merely high five the holy folk, recline with the righteous, and sing songs with the sanctified.

Jesus indicates His intentions by initiating fellowship with someone that everyone would say is not worth saving. I am here for him… and them!

The Teacher Gives Homework (Matthew 9:13) — What Jesus says next is a rebuke. It is an assignment to learn something about God that they should have already known. He says you are confused about my conduct because you don’t know my concerns, my character, and my call. You cannot make sense of me because you do not know my Father; I look just like Him (John 14:8-9).

  • Knowing Me is More Important than Religious Activity (Hosea 6:6)
  • Saving Them is the Heart of God (Ezekiel 33:11)

Questions and Direction

Question Action Item
Does my love move me toward people in need? (Matthew 9:1–8) Identify someone who needs help. Take one practical step to bring that person into contact with the care and truth of Jesus.
Am I allowing time with Jesus to change how I love? (Matthew 9:9) Set aside time daily to learn from Jesus, then deliberately put His teaching into practice in your relationships.
Who have I treated as someone to avoid rather than someone to love? (Matthew 9:10–13) Invite someone outside your usual circle to a meal or conversation. Listen, show mercy, and look for an opportunity to share Christ.

Jesus is calling me to love ____________________. This week, I will ________________________________________________.

Loving God draws us into fellowship with Jesus; following Jesus draws us toward the people He came to save. The Great Commandment takes visible form when we make room in our lives for people who need His mercy.

The Great Commission

The Great Commission (Matthew 28:16-20)

16 Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had appointed for them. 17 When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted.

18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.

The Team Described (Matthew 28:16-17)

The Task (Matthew 28:19-20)

The Assurance (Matthew 28:20)

Questions and Direction

Question Action Item
Will I bring my doubts to Jesus and still respond to His call? (Matthew 28:16–17) Name a doubt or struggle in prayer. Take your next step of obedience while seeking His help.
Am I helping people become disciples of Jesus? (Matthew 28:18–20) Identify one person you can help follow Jesus. Arrange time to share the gospel or study His teaching together, encouraging obedience and baptism as appropriate.
Where would confidence in His presence change my willingness to go? (Matthew 28:20) Take one step toward a person or place you have avoided, trusting that Jesus goes with you.

Whom will I intentionally help follow Jesus, and what will I do next?

I will help ____________________ follow Jesus. My next step is ________________________________, and I will take it by ____________________.

The risen Jesus sends imperfect followers under His complete authority to make disciples of all nations. We go, baptize, and teach obedience with confidence in His promise: we never go alone.

References

The Weaker Vessel

A young man in our fellowship sent me a question. He asked how I interpret the “weaker vessel” of 1 Peter 3:7. What follows is my response to that young man and others that may ask the same question in the future. I hope and pray that this response is accurate, Christ-centered, and respectful of the women in the faith community. Nothing would be more personally disappointing than to find out that my words were injurious to the faith of others, disrespectful to the fairer sex of the faith community, or misleading with regard to how men should regard and interact with women.

While I am not a Greek scholar, I do read the New Testament (and Septuagint) in its original language for study. This post contains a modicum of references to the words of the text being considered in the language in which it was written. Also, because the author is a Jew and because his audience is Jewish, I have endeavored to consider cultural and historical usages of words related to women, vessels, and weak.

The Meaning of “Vessel”

First, let us notice that the big fisher of men does not call the woman a vessel while treating the man as something superior. The expression, considering the context, assumes that both husband and wife are vessels. Peter is saying that human beings on earth are persons whose lives are carried in frail, physical bodies (Job 4:17-19; Job 14:1-2; Psalm 39:4-5; Psalm 78:39; Psalm 103:14-16; Psalm 144:3-4; Isaiah 40:6-8).

The Meaning of “Weaker”

But now, what does the apostle mean by weaker? In 1 Peter 3:7, weaker is:

ἀσθενεστέρῳ (asthenesterō) — “weaker,” “more frail,” or “having less strength.”

It is the comparative form of ἀσθενής (asthenēs), meaning weak, frail, or lacking strength. This precise form occurs only once in the New Testament, and the underlying adjective appears only here in Peter’s letters. The adjective weaker is comparative: the wife is described as the weaker vessel, not as worthless, incompetent, less intelligent, or spiritually deficient. There is nothing derogatory in the use of the word. (When Peter intends to speak against someone or indicate disdain he is quite capable. See 2 Peter 2:12-22.) After all, Jesus said that everyone in a human body is beset by weakness (Matthew 26:41; Mark 14:38).

But with regard to physical strength, women are weaker. Why do I say this? The scientific evidence strongly supports the idea that, in ordinary physical terms, the average woman is weaker than the average man—especially in upper-body strength, absolute force, power, and heavy-load capacity.

Physical characteristic Men, on average Women, on average Practical interpretation
Total skeletal-muscle mass About 33.0 kg About 21.0 kg Men averaged roughly 57% more skeletal muscle in one large adult sample.
Muscle as percentage of body mass About 38.4% About 30.6% A larger proportion of male body mass is ordinarily available for force production.
Upper-body strength Approximately 100% as the comparison baseline Approximately 50–60% of male strength in commonly studied movements The sex difference is especially pronounced in the shoulders, chest, arms, and grip. One frequently cited study found women about 52% as strong in elbow-flexor strength.
Lower-body strength Approximately 100% as the comparison baseline Approximately 65–75% of male strength in many comparisons The difference is smaller in the legs than in the upper body. One study found women about 66% as strong in knee-extension strength.
Absolute power and speed Generally 10–30% higher in sports dependent on speed, strength, power, or aerobic capacity Generally lower absolute output Men usually have the advantage in sprinting, jumping, throwing, lifting, accelerating, and forceful occupational tasks.
Maximal aerobic capacity, or VO₂ max Commonly about 15–25% higher, even when expressed relative to body weight Commonly about 15–25% lower Men ordinarily sustain a faster absolute pace in running, cycling, rowing, and other oxygen-intensive activities.
Running performance from 100 meters through the marathon Typically about 7–14% faster among comparable high-level competitors Typically about 7–14% slower The male advantage remains fairly consistent across conventional racing distances.
Heavy-load carriage A fixed heavy load generally represents a smaller percentage of body mass and aerobic capacity The same load ordinarily imposes greater relative metabolic demand In a military study involving a 30 kg load over 5 km, women exhibited significantly higher heart-rate and oxygen-consumption demands.
Muscular fatigue resistance at equal relative intensity Often fatigue sooner in sustained, lower-force contractions Often less fatigable, depending on the muscle and task Women frequently sustain submaximal contractions longer when both sexes work at the same percentage of their individual maximum.
Recovery during repeated submaximal work May experience faster performance decline in some repeated protocols Often maintain output more steadily Women’s lower absolute force, greater type-I-fiber representation, and metabolic characteristics can favor repeated-endurance work.
Conventional endurance performance Usually faster because of higher VO₂ max, cardiac output, hemoglobin concentration, and muscle mass Usually slower in absolute time despite some fatigue-resistance advantages Greater fatigue resistance does not ordinarily eliminate the male advantage in speed over standard endurance distances.
Very long running events Usually retain an advantage, but it narrows substantially The performance gap becomes much smaller as distance increases One large analysis estimated the male-to-female performance ratio narrowing from about 1.237 at a 25 km-equivalent effort to approximately 1.031 at 260 km. 
Extreme-distance swimming Not always advantaged Women may equal or sometimes outperform men in certain extreme-distance events Greater buoyancy, fat distribution, pacing, and fatigue resistance may become advantageous in long open-water swimming.
Training response Usually gain more absolute muscle and strength because they begin with greater muscle mass Frequently achieve similar—or occasionally greater—percentage improvements Women being weaker on average does not mean they respond poorly to training. Relative strength and hypertrophy gains are broadly comparable.
Inherent individual variation Wide range Wide range A trained woman may be stronger and more enduring than many untrained men; these figures describe overlapping populations, not every individual.

Table 1: Comparing Physical Strength – Men vs Women

Although Peter would not have had access to our research, he was able to observe the obvious differences in men and women; regarding physical strength, some of the differences are not insignificant. That makes physical strength the most natural component of Peter’s phrase the weaker vessel in 1 Peter 3:7. As a general biological reality, men possess greater average physical strength than women. Peter is acknowledging this difference, particularly in a society where a husband possessed substantially more physical, legal, and economic power than his wife.

That difference does not establish greater human value. A crystal chalice may be more fragile than a metal cup. It is more easily broken; those who would have such a vessel should be made aware and even reminded that its fragility requires greater care and honor. The metal cup sits in the cabinet; the crystal cup is placed in the China cabinet.

Peter is enjoining the person with greater physical power to exercise it gently and knowledgeably.

Digression: Socially Vulnerable

Allow me to digress a bit. Women in the first-century Greco-Roman world were often more socially and economically vulnerable than their husbands and men in general. A wife was also weaker not because she lacked intelligence or character, but because the surrounding social order gave her less power and protection. Peter commands the husband not to exploit that vulnerability. He must protect her, promote her, and provide for her; this is what Christ does for the church.

Ephesians 5:25–29 presents Christ’s care for the church as the pattern for a husband’s care for his wife. His headship is expressed through sacrificial action, not mere position.

Work of Christ Passage Meaning
He provides for her Ephesians 5:29 Christ “nourishes” the church. He sustains, feeds, and supplies what His people need.
He protects and cherishes her Ephesians 5:29 To “cherish” carries the idea of tender care, warmth, and preservation.
He gives Himself for her Ephesians 5:25 His leadership is cruciform—He bears the cost for the good of His bride.
He promotes her cleansing Ephesians 5:26 He sanctifies and cleanses her “with the washing of water by the word.”
He promotes her sanctification Ephesians 5:26–27 His aim is her holiness, maturity, and final glory.
He presents her in splendor Ephesians 5:27 Christ works toward the church’s beauty, purity, and perfected condition.

Table 2: Christ and the Church (Guidance for the Guys)

This means Christ’s relationship to the church is providential, protective, purifying, and perfecting. The husband’s pattern, therefore, is not simply: “I am the head.” It is: “I am responsible to use my strength, resources, words, and life for her good.” So a husband should seek to:

  • Provide what is necessary for the household.
  • Protect his wife from harm and needless exposure.
  • Cherish her with tenderness rather than harshness.
  • Promote her spiritual growth and flourishing.
  • Sacrifice his own comfort for her welfare.

A concise formulation might be:

As Christ provides for, protects, cherishes, cleanses, and sanctifies the church, the husband is called to employ his greater strength and leadership for the temporal and spiritual flourishing of his wife.

Further, it is common knowledge that during pregnancy women are more vulnerable. This would not have been Peter’s main point. But it should not be overlooked. During a pregnancy a woman in the second and third trimesters could not be expected to do the work she could prior. The same upgrades that give her the ability to conceive, bear, and nurture children have rendered her less capable for combat and some types of manual labor.

But now, back to what Peter means with weaker vessel.

Peter Denies Spiritual Inferiority

The controlling phrase is: “being heirs together of the grace of life.” Before God, husband and wife possess the same saving inheritance. The husband is not an heir while the wife merely accompanies him. They are co-heirs. Peter therefore combines difference in strength or vulnerability with equality in dignity, salvation, and inheritance.

The Warning for Handling the Weaker Vessel

The verse is not chiefly telling women what they lack. It is telling husbands how they must behave. Peter does not say, “She is weaker, so be opportunistic and take advantage of the fact that physically and socially you can control her.” He says, in effect:

“Because she is more vulnerable, use your strength and authority to honor her. You will answer to God for how you treat her. She is no less graced by God for salvation than you are.”

The warning that the husband’s prayers may be hindered is remarkably severe. God refuses to separate a man’s spirituality from his treatment of his wife. A husband cannot dishonor his wife and then presume that everything is right between himself and God. I believe that Peter acknowledges unequal strength while commanding equal honor and a serving heart in men that prevents their prayers from being hindered; they are not to take advantage of the situation.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick Barnes, Sr.

Old Habits Die Hard

15:1 And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, “Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” 2 Therefore, when Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and dispute with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem, to the apostles and elders, about this question. (Acts 15:1-2)

The conference of apostles and elders was convened to consider the question of what was required for Gentile salvation (Acts 15:1-2, 5-6). But was that all it was about? No! The news of how the church was changing has come to the attention of believers with a nasty penchant for nationalism, jealousy for their God, and an evil envy (Acts 13:45) toward those who were entering the kingdom without the rigmarole of trying to keep the law.

The push for Gentile circumcision and adopting the Law was a effort in a larger stratagem aimed at hindering the entrance of so many non-Jewish people (Acts 23:13) and forcing a conformity on outsiders. The conformity would make strict Jews feel more comfortable. Especially as it regards the Pharisees, this effort is a remnant tendency from their life before Christ (Matthew 23:13); they had a habit of hindering people as they were endeavoring to enter the kingdom of heaven.

23:13 But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither go in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in. (Matthew 23:13)

Legalists neither lean on saving grace nor allow others to enjoy the gifts of God’s unmatched goodness.

It is still happening today. That is, today there is still an effort to bottleneck the way to God through additional religious requirements, rigid demands decorated as piety, and seemingly sacred rituals. The way to God, though, is just Jesus. What is the way? Again, just Jesus. He is the Way (John 14:6). He is the ladder leading to the Father, the only avenue to the Almighty, and the exclusive means by which we must be saved. Pharisees both then and now are going to keep trying to mess with the message of reconciliation. They had to be stopped then. They have to be stopped now.

Even when the evidence has been mounting the legalist’s habit of hampering others coming to God with rules persists. In the context of the passage we are considering, this is a settled matter that legalists keep bringing up. That is, even though the issue has already been settled through the prior experience of Peter and other Jews with the commander of an Italian regiment, the tendency to try to bring everyone into legalism will not die. It is for many a hard habit to break. Look with me at what had happened before and after the incident recorded in Acts 15:1-2.

  • Acts 10:1 — Cornelius, centurion of the Italian Regiment

  • Acts 10:44–48 — Holy Spirit falls on Gentiles

  • Acts 11:15–18 — Peter recounts the event

  • Acts 15:1–2 — dispute brought to apostles and elders (we are here)

  • Acts 15:7–11 — Peter uses the earlier Gentile conversion as evidence

Later Peter (Acts 15:7-11) will refer back to how God chose that Gentiles should hear the gospel through his mouth, and how God gave them the Holy Spirit without first making them Jews. His references clearly points back to Cornelius and his household. What does this mean? It means that the Jews that came from Jerusalem have already seen that God accepts Gentiles that believe in Christ without circumcision. But they cannot let it go. They are on their own mission to stop the spread of a gospel that does not require circumcision. The mission of the church comes after their own mission to make everyone like themselves.

Both then and now there has to be a Spirit-led focus on the mission of the church. This is what led the Christian Jewish leadership in Jerusalem to write a letter that released Gentiles from circumcision. They saw the stifling effect of demanding adherence to the law on non-Jews who were ready to receive Christ. Serious about serving God well in their traditions, they could also see beyond their preferences and prejudices. They put Christ and His mission of reaching the nations before their own desires for uniformity and cultural comfort. Polhill says it well:

[T]he Jewish Christian leadership showed a concern for the world mission of the church that overshadowed their own special interests. They took a step that was absolutely essential if the Gentile mission was to be a success. To have required circumcision and the Torah would have severely limited the appeal to Gentiles, perhaps even killed it. Yet the Jewish Christians only stood to lose by not requiring Jewish proselyte procedure of the Gentile converts. It was bound to create problems with nonbelieving Jews. That it indeed did so is indicated in a later passage in Acts (21:20–22). If the Jerusalem leadership had only been concerned about the effectiveness of their own witness among the Jews, they would never have taken such a step. That it did so is testimony of their concern for the total mission of the church. Their vision stretched beyond their own bailiwick—indeed, to the ends of the earth. (Polhill, 1992, pp. 337-338)

People who are missional in their thinking are capable of getting out of the way and letting go of their wants. In the love of God that has been poured out into their hearts (Romans 5:5) they have the capacity to both see the truth of how the command to love others applies and then execute. In the early church it is seen in Jewish leaders that are willing to let their Gentile brethren be themselves insofar as it did not displease the Lord Jesus. Instead of bending Scripture to suit their goal of manipulating believers, they bent themselves to accept differences and promote a world with more people following Christ.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

References

Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, pp. 337–338). Broadman & Holman Publishers.

Simon Says, Simon Sees, and Peter Calls It

9 But there was a certain man called Simon, who previously practiced sorcery in the city and astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great, 10 to whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, “This man is the great power of God.” 11 And they heeded him because he had astonished them with his sorceries for a long time. 12 But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized. 13 Then Simon himself also believed; and when he was baptized he continued with Philip, and was amazed, seeing the miracles and signs which were done. 14 Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, 15 who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit. 16 For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17 Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit. 18 And when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money, 19 saying, “Give me this power also, that anyone on whom I lay hands may receive the Holy Spirit.” 20 But Peter said to him, “Your money perish with you, because you thought that the gift of God could be purchased with money! 21 You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. 23 For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity.” 24 Then Simon answered and said, “Pray to the Lord for me, that none of the things which you have spoken may come upon me.” 25 So when they had testified and preached the word of the Lord, they returned to Jerusalem, preaching the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans.

Simon Says (Acts 8:9-12) — The conjunction of 8:9 has is usually translated but (δέ – ESV, KJV, NKJV, ESV); that word is used to introduce this part of the Samaria story as contrast with what was previously said. (In the wider scope this part of the story is still about Peter and the Lord’s work through him. The segue to the importance of Peter’s role in ministry to the Samaritans is through the account of what happened with Philip when he left Jerusalem.) Immediately prior Luke says that there was great joy in that city (Acts 8:8). Now Luke says there were some bad things happening as well; or “but concerning a certain man called Simon what is about to be related is not part of that great joy.” The Simon of this part of the narrative, is described thus:

  • practiced sorcery in the city — Simon Magus was a sorcerer. He used unauthorized means or witchcraft to interact with the spiritual realm for his own purposes. God had forbidden this among the people of Israel (Exodus 22:18; Leviticus 19:26, 31; Leviticus 20:6,7) and cited witchcraft as a reason why he was deposing rulers (2 Kings 21:6) and removing nations (Deuteronomy 18:9-14).

Ungodly spiritual leaders operate in illegitimate spiritual activity. They do not work 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ witchcraft their work 𝑖𝑠 witchcraft — an ungodly means of using the spiritual to obtain and keep control of things and people.

  • astonished the people of Samaria — Through witchcraft Simon did things that were astonishing. How? First, the evil spirits he was working with could give him insights about other people and things that no human could know. (He was receiving information from evil spirits that was mixed with lies in order to become credible. These spirit that provide him information are demons that want to deceive people and want worship and sacrifices that belong only to God [John 10:10]. See Leviticus 17:7; Deuteronomy 32:17; Psalm 106:37; Isaiah 13:21; 1 Samuel 16:14-16. The teachings that are inspired by these spirits are doctrines of demons; See 1 Timothy 4:1.) Second, the evil spirits he worked with could interact with our world in ways that would have made Simon look more powerful than any human could be. Through cooperation with unseen evil spirits Simon could be made to look like he had influence over the spiritual and material world. But the cost was high. His collaboration had facilitated the demon possession of many Samaritans (Acts 8:7). Today sorcery is still taking place. In what ways?
    1. Divination: This is seeking knowledge of the future or the unknown by supernatural means (e.g., tarot cards, crystal balls, astrology, and Ouija boards). Even in Christian circles there a people who constantly seek a word about what lies ahead without clearly indicating that they are seeking it from God. Something, then, dropped in their spirit. References: Deuteronomy 18:10, Ezekiel 21:21
    2. Sorcery and Magic: Practitioners of witchcraft perform rituals and cast spells (runes and incantations) believed to invoke supernatural forces. References: Galatians 5:19-21, Revelation 21:8; Isaiah 47:9, 47:12
    3. Necromancy, Consulting Mediums or Spiritists: Communicating with the dead or attempting to summon spirits of the dead. Seeking guidance or knowledge from those who claim to have contact with spirits or the dead. References: Deuteronomy 18:11, 1 Samuel 28 (The Witch of Endor) References: Leviticus 19:31, Isaiah 8:19
    4. Witchcraft or Casting Spells: Performing rituals or spells to influence people or situations through supernatural means. References: Exodus 22:18, Deuteronomy 18:10
    5. Astrology: Believing that the stars and planets have an influence on human affairs and natural phenomena, often used for guidance. References: Isaiah 47:13-14
    6. Fortune-Telling: Predicting or foreseeing future events, often through palm reading, crystal balls, or other occult practices. References: Acts 16:16
    7. Potion-Making and Use of Charms: Creating and using potions, amulets, or charms believed to have magical properties for healing, harm, or protection. References: Ezekiel 13:18-20
    8. Idolatry and Sacrifices to False Gods: Worshiping idols or making sacrifices to gods other than the God of the Bible, often involving occult rituals. References: 1 Corinthians 10:20-21, Leviticus 20:2-6
  • self proclaimed greatness — As with all false leaders, Simon claimed to be someone great. People taken with his lies believed that he was someone important with God. The belief was broad; the least in the city and people of great influence or importance were all deceived into believing that Simon was from God.
  • they heeded him (obeyed him) saying “This man is the great power of God” — Simon presented himself as an emanation from God; that emanation was called The Great Power of God. This is a gnostic idea. (He is often said to be the father of Gnosticism. Justin Martyr, a church father from Samaria, says that this same Simon was the source of gnostic heresies.) The astonishing things done by Simon were aimed at controlling others. The goal was always to be in power and to have people under his control. Evil spiritual leaders enslave people. Godly spiritual leaders set them free.

Sorcerers bear an uncanny resemblance to their father the devil. In what way? They cannot resist the temptation to self promote (Isaiah 14:12-14; Ezekiel 28:12-17; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Revelation 12:7-9; Matthew 4:8-10); they are unable to stop using the spiritual realm to (1) draw attention to themselves, (2) promote their own agenda, and (3) lead people into bondage. Their messages, although mixed with truth, are poison. The antidote for the venom of these asps is the work of God in the hearts of the deceived. That work accompanies preaching powered by the Holy Spirit.

Simon Sees Part 1: Figuring Out Philip (Acts 8:13) — The believing of Simon would seem to be a good thing. Not so fast. We are hasty and naive when we jump to the conclusion that the mention of faith means salvation. No New Testament writer hits harder than James when he says this:

You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! (James 2:19)

But you will answer, “When [Simon] was baptized he continued with Philip.” With the mention of his faith and baptism was the participle: seeing the miracles and signs which were done. Luke is trying to say something about this magic man’s faith and conversion. A similar thing was said in John’s gospel (John 2:23-3:4).

Judas was with Jesus. And Simon Magus is with Philip. Don’t get too excited by attendance or early participation. People will be present in your ministry for motives outside the mission. And they will ride with you for reasons that are not right.

With the introduction of the gospel, Simon has lost his influence and the means to his affluence. From Simon’s perspective, Philip is a more powerful magician. Simon’s goal is simple: figure out Philip.

Apostolic Approval and Learning (Acts 8:14-17; Luke 9:51-54) — Why was the Spirit not given when the people of Samaria believed and were baptized (Acts 8:12)? Was the preaching of Philip somehow deficient in its description of what is required for salvation (Acts 8:4)? No. Deacon Philip has been trained by the apostles for three years, selected for leadership by the congregation in Jerusalem, and given apostolic approval for ministry. There is no mention made of the need to correct the message that had been delivered by Philip. Peter and John had been sent from Jerusalem when it was heard that the Samaritans had receive the word of God (Acts 8:14); there is no indication that they went with doubts about the quality of teaching. The apostles were sent by the church to provide what was lacking — approval.

Figure 1: The population of the world broken into the categories of Short and Tall.

 

 

Figure 2: The population of the world broken into the categories

of Jew, Part Jew, and Non-Jew or Jew, Samaritan, and Gentile.

The numbers shown here are examples and not to be regarded as

representative of the world in 36 AD.

 

Ministry Validation

The ministry, prior to this point, has been to the Jews. By taking the gospel to the Samaritans the almoner Philip has started a new type of ministry. (It was prefigured by Jesus Himself in the gospel of John. See John 4:1-42. However, it had not been revisited since then.) Philip’s work cannot be given Heaven’s endorsement until the appointed authorities have indicated their approval. In particular, Peter must sanction the work. This was indicated earlier in the ministry of Jesus:

  • Peter Looses (Matthew 16:17-19) – The you (δώσω σοι τὰς κλεῖδας τῆς βασιλείας τῶν οὐρανῶν) of verse 19 is singular; Jesus was not talking to all of the disciples. In context, it is plain that the Lord was talking to Simon (Matthew 16:17-18). The big fisherman was given a new name and then declared to be a large part of the foundation of the church (Ephesians 2:19-20; Revelation 21:14). (Jesus, though, is the chief cornerstone.) Peter, in particular, had a role of spiritual binding and releasing. He did not take this to himself and was not able to confer the ability on anyone else. If Peter has been able to pass the position or authority to approve new ministries to others, the laying on of hands for the seven deacons would have made requesting the Holy Spirit for the Samaritans unnecessary; Philip would have done it. The ministry, with regard to the receiving of the Holy Spirit, is still locked. Simon Peter has the keys (Matthew 16:19). (Some will use these comments to say that I am with a particular denomination or promoting the papacy. I am doing no such thing; these are merely my meager efforts to explain the text to my brothers and sisters.)
  • Peter Leads (Luke 22:31-32; John 21:15-17) – His fall is foretold by Jesus (Luke 22:33-34); so is his restoration (Luke 22:32). Peter is called upon to lead the leaders. When they have all been weakened by the trials of Jesus execution and the betrayal by Judas, Peter will strengthen them (Acts 1:15-26). He feeds his fellow disciples the word of God (Acts 1:16, 20).

In summary, the sending of the apostles was manifold in what it accomplished. The apostles are now seen as being over the Samaritan church as well as the church in Jerusalem. In this way the church is protected from division that was so prominent in the relationship between the Jews and the Samaritans (John 4:9; Luke 9:51-53). Another good outcome of sending the apostles to Samaria to verify the claims was that John’s perspective on Samaritans is further adjusted. Fruchtenbaum says it succinctly:

 

First, so that Samaritan salvation could be authenticated by apostolic authority; and second, because Peter had the keys of the kingdom. John was sent so that the matter could be established by the mouth of two witnesses. Furthermore, this was to be a personal lesson for him, because he and his brother James had wanted the Samaritans destroyed (Lk. 9: 54). (Fruchtenbaum, 2020, Kindle Locations 3454-3456)

 

Upon arriving they found that the new believers had yet to receive the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:15). Why? That is, again, why was the Spirit not given when the people of Samaria received the word of God. The Lord wanted everyone to know that this ministry to Samaritans cannot be deemed valid until His man Peter had used his keys to unlock the door or loose the spiritual blessing of the Holy Spirit to them. The apostles do that by praying for the Samaritans to receive the Holy Spirit. And when their hands were laid on these new believers they received the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:16).

 

Simon Sees Part 2: Getting Control (Acts 8:18-19) — It is the “aha” moment that the magician was waiting for. Philip had received the Spirit by faith. But with the laying on of hands of the apostles he was granted special authority for signs. Now, although the people had already believed in Jesus, with the apostles approval they receive the Holy Spirit. Simon wants power. That is what he says: Give me this power also. He is not interested in people or the kingdom of God; he wants to be someone great again. This power is the means.

Getting to God is not the goal for everyone going to church.

 

Peter Puts it in Perspective (Acts 8:20-23) — Simon’s heart is exposed in his offer to buy power. It is explained in Peter’s comments. Listen as Peter puts Simon’s issues in perspective:

 

  • Simon’s Path – he is on the path to destruction. Peter says that the money can perish with him.
  • Simon Perversion – he has turned the Holy Spirit, grace, and the gift of God into a thing things to be controlled for money. In the mind of the magician the gospel is merely means for manipulating people.
  • Simon’s Problem – he is not a member of the church (part) and has no inheritance in Christ (portion/lot). Why? The reason is given: a heart condition (Jeremiah 17:9).
  • Simon’s motives reveal him to be bitter (Hebrews 12:15) and bound (John 8:36) by iniqity.

 

Simon Says Part 2: You Do It (Acts 8:24) — Notice that Simon does not obey. His response seems like humility. “I do not have a right standing with God and therefore cannot pray. Pray for me.” Rather, it reveals that (1) he was not submitted to leadership, (2) he did not respect God’s right to reign in his life, and (3) was not wanting to be in God’s will. Consider what he wanted Peter to pray for: that none of the things which you have spoken may come upon me. What about forgiveness? He was not after forgiveness. Why? Forgiveness is of no value when there is no desire for fellowship. Simon’s primary concern was avoiding the penalty of sin.

The Grace of God

Even after being exposed as having evil intent the opportunity to get right was offered to Simon. That is grace and mercy. Have you fallen? Are you having a hard time believing that there is hope for you. Call on the Lord who is rich in grace and mercy. Admit wrong motives and confess any attempts to use spiritual things for selfish purposes. If you will draw near to God he will draw near to you.

References

Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum. (2020). Commentary Series: The Book of Acts. Ariel Ministries. Kindle Edition.

End Notes

They had not yet been baptized by the Holy Spirit. He had come upon the Jews, but not yet upon the Samaritans. The reason was that the Messiah had given the keys of the kingdom to Peter, and it was up to Peter to allow any new group into the body. As previously mentioned, in New Testament times, the three main people groups were the Jews, the Samaritans, and the Gentiles. (Fruchtenbaum, 2020, Kindle Locations 3465-3467)

 

The purpose was authentication. For the Jerusalem apostles, it authenticated Samaritan salvation, proving that Samaritans were savable. For the Samaritans, it authenticated apostolic authority, because they received Spirit baptism by the laying on of hands by Jewish apostles from Jerusalem. That meant they were not to set up a separate, rival Samaritan church, as they had set up a separate, rival Samaritan temple. (Fruchtenbaum, 2020, Kindle Locations 3510-3513)

He Met Them Where They Were

Before we excuse ourselves from serving God because of our many flaws, we should remember the people that God used mightily were also flawed. And they were used while still full of faults. (God did not endorse their sin. But He also did not refuse to summon them until they had purified their own lives.) The Lord met them where they were. Consider with me just a few examples:

1) Rahab – This woman is introduced not as a moral example. She is presented to the reader as Canaanite prostitute living in a condemned city (Joshua 2). She is triple marginalized: by occupation, by ethnicity, and by gender. What is striking is that God does not reform Rahab before using her to help others. He first reveals Himself to her. Rahab’s journey begins not with covenant knowledge, but with fear-informed faith. Listen to her:

For the LORD your God,
He is God in heaven above
and on earth beneath.
Joshua 2:11

She does not yet possess Israel’s law, worship, or moral framework. What she possesses is a growing conviction about who God is — and the courage to act on it at great personal risk.

2) Gideon – Although many commentators find fault with this man for his repeated requests for proof, God does not reprimand him. Gideon was raised in a household of idolatry and needed time and mentoring to come out of Canaanized thinking. God met Gideon where he was – fearful, secretly threshing wheat in a wine press, and ignorant of what God could do.

3) Samson – Although he had been given great gifts for helping others, this man would not move to help anyone. He was only motivated by self interests. And so God used Samson’s narcissism to nettle the man into the work that was needed by the people. How? When it seemed like all was in ruins, this egotistical womanizer called out to God. And God met him where he was and gave him the strength to die doing what he was supposed to be doing all along. You will reply, “But, he died!” And I will answer, “On purpose! That is, although he had been distracted and nearly destroyed by his own desires, Samson was now focused on striking a blow against the enemies of God and his own people. Yes, he died. But he died in the purpose that God had given him as God met him where he was.”

4) Peter – After his tragic failures, Peter could not bring himself to say that he had agape (ἀγάπη) love for Jesus. So Jesus met the big fisherman where he was and said that if philia (φιλία – brotherly love) was all that Peter could muster, then let it be demonstrated by feeding Jesus’ sheep.

I could go on. But these are enough to show the truth: God is not waiting for you to get it together so that you can live in a way that pleases Him. He is meeting you where you are. How? Through Jesus Christ. The Father has sent the Son into the world to save us (John 3:16). Christ came here to meet us where we are in the human condition (John 1:14). He went beyond becoming a human being to paying the price of our rebellion against God (1 John 4:10). A life of purpose and living effectively, like Rahab or Gideon or Samson or Peter, begins with acknowledging and accepting who God is and what He has done for us.

Rahab did not know a lot about God. But she accepted that He is sovereign and had a right to reign in her life (Joshua 2:11). Next is admitting our great need (Romans 3:23); it is best if we look to the example of children (Matthew 18:3-4; Matthew 19:14). They know they need help. They are ever mindful of their need for help and the possibility of getting help through a parent or guardian. Acknowledge your need and then receive the Son by faith (John 1:11-12) and begin letting Him teach and care for you (Matthew 11:28-30; John 5:24). Under His teachings you will become a blessing to others… like Rahab, and Gideon, and Peter.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

Counsel on Being Confronted and Criticized (Acts 11:1-18)

1 Now the apostles and brethren who were in Judea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. 2 And when Peter came up to Jerusalem, those of the circumcision contended with him, 3 saying, “You went in to uncircumcised men and ate with them!”

Regarding religious folk and ministry progress, the first act of the circumcision was not to ascribe to God glory for His amazing grace (Acts 11:1). Rather, it was to confront His servant for the audacity to live outside the lines (Acts 11:2-3). Are you following Jesus? Are you being led by the Spirit? Be warned! Some people are going to (1) find and focus on your faults, (2) point out and become preoccupied with perceived problems, and (3) come against you or contend with you for breaking with convention. What should you do?

  1. Be Approachable – Some leaders are above reproach and approach. They cannot be confronted and do not make themselves available for anything but applause and words full of warm sentiments. Oh leader, make yourself available for feedback and accessible to those who will give you constructive criticism. Do not be passive in this regard; be proactive about getting evaluations on your work.
  2. Be Accountable – Peter was able to present the facts supporting his decisions. He also had people who could testify to the veracity of his account. Jesus had mentored him into not going it alone. During the earthly ministry of Jesus the disciples were sent by twos (Mark 6:7; Luke 10:1; Ecclesiastes 4:9, 10). When Peter went out to do something that was not the norm he took people with him. He made his movements and ministry accountable to others for the sake of the gospel. By doing things in the open and with witnesses Peter is able to easily get two or three witnesses so that every word could be established (Deuteronomy 19:15).
  3. Be Patient – Some will need time to see why you are doing things differently. Don’t get riled up over a detractor. Take time to understand what they perceive to be a problem and then patiently help them to understand the vision God has given you and the results that have come out of the work.

Being led by the Spirit of Jesus is going to lead to conflict with the world and more than a few people in the church. Expect it. But also make sure that you are approachable, accountable, and patient.

In His grip by His grace,
Roderick L. Barnes, Sr.

Principles for Effective Ministry with Miracles – Part 2 of 2 (Acts 9:36-43)

Introduction

In Acts 9:32-35 Luke recounts how the message of the gospel was given a greater audience through the miraculous healing of a paralytic named Aeneas in Lydda (Acts 9:32-34). In that small passage we took time to look at two principles that must be honored if miracles are to be used effectively in ministry.

  • The Principle of Right Going – all going must be by people empowered to present the gospel. There must be an anointing that enables the wonder and most importantly the witness for Jesus.
  • The Principle of Right Giving – all glory goes to God. Miracles must be used to make Him known. They are not permanent fixtures of discipleship community but seasonal signs pointing to the Savior.

The miracle was so marvelous that all who dwelt at Lydda and Sharon saw [the healed man] and turned to the Lord (Acts 9:35).  Sharon is not a city but a coastal plain of some 30 miles stretching from Joppa to Caesarea. See Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 — The regions reached by Peter when Aeneas and Tabitha are healed. Sharon is not a city but a coastal plain of about 30 miles.

Luke makes mention of  Sharon as a segue into a new story using the same main character — Peter the apostle. As we consider this next passage we will also encounter a third principle that must be honored if a ministry is going to use miracles effectively: The Principle of Right Getting.

After Aeneas (Acts 9:36-39)

36 At Joppa there was a certain disciple named Tabithaa, which is translated Dorcasb. This woman was full of good works and charitable deedsc which she did. 37 But it happened in those days that she became sick and died.d When they had washed here, they laid her in an upper room. 38 And since Lydda was near Joppa, and the disciples had heard that Peter was there, they sent two men to him, imploring him not to delay in coming to them. 39 Then Peter arose and went with them. When he had come, they brought him to the upper room. And all the widows stood by him weeping, showing the tunics and garments which Dorcas had made while she was with them.

The contrast is stark. Luke takes his reader away from the scene of repentance, revival, and rejuvenated life in Lydda to a scene of tragedy and mourning about 12 miles away in Joppa. (See Figure 1 above.) Where Aeneas has made his bed and is walking in the gracious gift of restored health, Dorcas is dead. Her lifeless form lies on a table or bed surrounded by weeping widows (Acts 9:39).

While we are wanting to get to the principle of effective use of miracles in ministry we must not be so hurried that we miss other truths that, when prayerfully considered, will do much to help us live effectively in the Lord’s service. First, do not overlook the fact that the person upon whom this illness came was a Jesus follower – a disciple. Disease and even Death itself had visited a woman full of good works and charitable deeds. Think on the facts: (1) Dorcas was a disciple. (2) Dorcas was full of good deeds; her hands were neither idle nor involved in evil. (3) Dorcas got sick. (4) Dorcas died. We do well to consider these facts when we suggest that a person’s sickness today is (a) not God’s will because the person is a Christian or (b) that the sickness will be eliminated by casting it out in Jesus’ name.

Let us not corrupt the gospel by promising people a life free from sickness when they receive Jesus. There is no pass on pain for those who have given their lives to Christ. The promise of the gospel is forgiveness for all our failings, eternal and abundant life with purpose, the Lord’s abiding presence, and the privilege of partaking in His sufferings (1 Peter 4:13).

Dorcas had used so much of her time and talent and treasure to help the poor that her passing was the cause of exceedingly great sorrow among the disciples… especially the people she had helped. The second thing we must not miss is that Dorcas is missed so much that the disciples decide to ask for something that has not happened in the recorded history of the church at this point: raising the dead. Do not miss the questions that you should ask yourself:

  • Could it be proven that I have, in serving the Lord, provided help for the poor and made a difference that will be missed?
  • Could anyone gather enough evidence of my good deeds to show that my life was a blessing and not a blight on the community?
  • Would the sum total of my good works warrant a crazy plan to get a busy man to come and raise me from the dead?

Having heard about the healing of Aeneas the disciples sent two men to ask Peter to come immediately. He goes with them and, when he has arrived at the home in Joppa, is taken to the upper room. At this point the widows begin working on Peter. They aim to convince him that Tabitha’s life was worthy of a special work of God through him.

Unprecedented Power Displayed Through Peter (Acts 9:40-42; Mark 5:21-43)

40 But Peter put them all out, and knelt down and prayed. And turning to the body he said, “Tabitha, arise.” And she opened her eyes, and when she saw Peter she sat up. 41 Then he gave her his hand and lifted her up; and when he had called the saints and widows, he presented her alive. 42 And it became known throughout all Joppa, and many believed on the Lord.

Peter has seen a situation like this before. During His master’s ministry there was a little girl that had just died. Her father was a ruler in the community (Matthew 9:23) and their position made his daughter’s death highly visible. Jesus assesses the situation and then puts out the people (Matthew 9:24).

Peter sent them and the other mourners out of the room, as he had seen his Master do before he raised Jairus’s daughter from her deathbed; then he uttered a short sentence in Aramaic, differing only in one letter from Jesus’ words to Jairus’s daughter. Whereas Jesus had said Talitha qum (i) (Mark 5:41), Peter now said Tabitha qum (i))—“Tabitha, get up.”

Bruce, F. F. (1988). The Book of the Acts (p. 199). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

The ministry of Peter to Dorcas and the community was not occasioned by his presence or his preaching. He became effective in helping them only in his willingness to be humbled. Every knee must bow. His words toward the body were imbued with power only after his pleading. Before he could give the command he needed to get the power. Peter follows Jesus’ lead and gives us the following principle for ministry with miracles:

The Principle of Right Getting (Get Down, Get Help)

What the Church needs to-day is not more machinery or better, not new organizations or more and novel methods, but men whom the Holy Ghost can use — men of prayer, men mighty in prayer. The Holy Ghost does not flow through methods, but through men. He does not come on machinery, but on men. He does not anoint plans, but men — men of prayer. (Bounds, Kindle Locations 46-48)

Figure 2 — Time in prayer with Chancellor Barnes on 2024-11-11 at the home of Austin and Aubrey lane during a Compass Young Adults meeting.

The language of the quote above is old. It speaks of prayer in ways that seem to make it the province and power of men. I will not charge E. M. Bounds with being chauvinistic; he spoke in a manner customary of his times. An updated version of the quote would change the word men to people; people of prayer are an indispensable part of a ministry that will be able to use the miraculous for the glory of God and the good of many. Such people take to heart the words of the Lord regarding prayer and make it their business to both be obedient and follow his example.

  • Receiving Requires Prayer and Faith (Matthew 21:22) And whatever things you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive.
  • Some Changes Require Prayer (Mark 9:29) So He said to them, “This kind can come out by nothing but prayer and fasting.”
  • The Ultimate Purpose of the Prayer is the Glorification of the Son (John 14:13-14) And whatever you ask in My name, that I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything in My name, I will do it.
  • Corporate Prayer in Jesus’ Name Has Special Influence with the Father (Matthew 18:19-20) Again I say to you that if two of you agree on earth concerning anything that they ask, it will be done for them by My Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them.

The Persistence of Peter (Acts 9:43)

So it was that he stayed many days in Joppa with Simon, a tanner.

Aeneas has been healed and Dorcas has been raised from the dead. The miracles were used by Peter to occasion faith in Jesus. And now that there are a number of new believers the real work begins – discipleship (Matthew 28:18-20). Peter stays in the region in order to teach the new believers all that Jesus commanded. Beyond the excitement of the miracle is the more mundane work of day-to-day teaching, mentoring, and helping the Jesus followers in their new relationship with the Lord. Unlike the mass revivals of our day where people are reached and then left to the locals for teaching, Peter stays for a hands-on approach to making disciples.

Questions for Community Discussion

  1. Why did the healing of Dorcas cause many to believe? (Acts 9:37, 42)
  2. Why did Peter stay? (Mark 3:14; Matthew 28:18-20)
  3. Peter prayed before he did anything. Why did he do that? (John 15:15)
  4. Does your approach to helping others and discipleship look like Peter’s?
  5. In what ways should your approach to helping people be changed to match the example of Jesus and the apostles?

Footnotes

a Literally in Aramaic her name means Gazelle.

b Dorcas is Greek for Gazelle. It is obvious that Luke wanted to make his work accessible to an audience that was not Jewish.

e The text that follows is from the Mishna Shabbat – a written redaction of the Jewish oral traditions known as the Oral Torah. Mishna Shabbat 23:5 One may perform all the requirements for a corpse [on Shabbat]: [One may] anoint and wash him, provided one does not move a limb. One may move the pillow from under him to place him on the sand so that he will keep [from decomposing]. One may tie his jaw, not so that it rises but so it does not fall. And similarly, [if] a beam has broken one may support it with a bench or boards from a bed, not so that it rises but so it does not fall. One may not close the eyes of a corpse on Shabbat, nor [even] on a week-day while he is [still] expiring. [If] one closes the eyes of a dying person while he is [still] expiring he has shed blood.

References

E.M. Bounds (2015-11-23). Power Through Prayer (Kindle Locations 46-48). Scriptura Press. Kindle Edition.

Principles for Effective Ministry with Miracles – Part 1 of 2 (Acts 9:32-43)

Introduction

The itinerant ministry of Jesus, with all His miracle-working power, was all that His men knew.  In His presence for over three years they were made to see with their own eyes the lifestyle of witness-with-wonders evangelism even before they could understand their Master’s messages. But Jesus took time to make sure that they knew how to use signs properly. “Do what I do” was and is the most effective strategy for educating Jesus followers in evangelism… especially when miracles are involved. Robert Coleman puts it this way:

Amazing as it may seem, all Jesus did to teach these men his way was to draw them close to himself. He was his own school and curriculum. Coleman, Robert E. (2006-04-01). Master Plan of Evangelism, The (pp. 37-38). Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

Through His example they were witnesses to His way of bringing the gospel to the world. Although they did not realize it at the time of their teaching, they were students of the principles that must be honored by anyone that would be effective when using miracles for the King and His kingdom. In the closing of chapter nine we will see that the gospel, advanced using amazing and gracious displays of healing power, is going to move most effectively when (1) there is a right going, when (2) there is a right giving, and when (3) there is a right getting.

Figure 1 – Jesus healed a man that had been born blind and thereby provided evidence for the shocking truths that He has been teaching (John 9:1-11).

Right Going and Giving (Acts 9:32-35)

32 Now it came to pass, as Peter went through all parts of the country, that he also came down to the saints who dwelt in Lydda. 33 There he found a certain man named Aeneas, who had been bedridden eight years and was paralyzed. 34 And Peter said to him, “Aeneas, Jesus the Christ heals you. Arise and make your bed.” Then he arose immediately. 35 So all who dwelt at Lydda and Sharon saw him and turned to the Lord.

Verse 32 picks up after the brief account of Saul’s conversion. It came to pass is Luke’s way of unpacking the how and why of Acts 9:31.

Then the churches throughout all Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified. And walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, they were multiplied. (Acts 9:31, NKJV)

In that verse we hear that the churches had peace and were edified. The peace was twofold. First, it is the work of the Holy Spirit; He metes out a peace that surpasses understanding (Philippians 4:7). Such a peace would be a comfort of the Holy Spirit. Second, it is no doubt a consequence of converting the leading critic — Saul of Tarsus. The one who had waged war with the people of God had become a Jesus follower himself. But how were they edified?

In the New Testament edification is the building up of the commitment and character of saints; it can be the result of teaching or revelation that causes the hearer to be strengthened in their faith and more mature in their service of God (1 Corinthians 14:4, 17). This had been happening in Jerusalem for over two years (AD 33 – 35). Now Peter is bringing the ministry of teaching to the saints dispersed by recent persecution. He is going through all parts of the country teaching. While the ministry of teaching or preaching is not explicitly mentioned, it is implied that Peter is teaching and preaching as he goes. As a shepherd he is going to where the flocks have been moved by recent persecution; when he arrives on the scene he teaches them. This is what he has been called and trained to do:

  • Peter Has Been Trained to Teach (Mark 3:14; Acts 4:13) – Then He appointed twelve, that they might be with Him and that He might send them out to preach,
  • Peter Has Been Charged to Teach (John 21:15-17; Acts 5:19) – He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me?” Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, “Do you love Me?” And he said to Him, “Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You.” Jesus said to him, “Feed My sheep. …”
  • Peter Has Been Changed to Teach (Luke 24:45) – And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures.

The Principle of Right Going: The Mission, Missionary, and Ministry Must be His

The first principle of effective ministry involving miracles is that the person through whom the work is done must have been sent. Carts are placed before horses and woe follows when unconverted people attempt to use Heaven’s power without the permission of Heaven’s Prince. For at least two reasons, if Jesus is not involved, using miracles in ministry will not work. First, the work done will not be rewarded and the workers will not be recognized (Matthew 7:21-23). Second, the hellions being exorcised are able to distinguish between genuine practitioners of the Christian faith and powerless soothsayers. Simply making mention of Jesus’ name will not work when Jesus has no intention of working through the person for His own glory and the good of His own people (Acts 19:11-16). There will be no genuine miracle apart from genuine mission.

Philip the Evangelist, under the leading of the Holy Spirit, has already come through this region preaching in all the cities till he came to Caesarea (Act 8:40). As Peter was serving in Lydda he found a certain man named Aeneas (praiseworthy; praise). Luke tells us that the man had been bedridden eight years.

The healing power present in Peter does not require his voice. His shadow was enough to effect healing. So then, why did he feel it necessary to speak to the man? During his time with Jesus the former fisherman had seen many miracles. On some occasions, preceding the miracle, there were words spoken by Jesus that were aimed at helping the audience understand the meaning of the miracle. When the sense and significance of the miracle were present with the work it became more than a miracle; it became a sign (John 11:41-42).

Figure 2 – On 2025-01-19 a few people from Compass Church went to an assisted living facility to bring the gospel, worship, and encouragement. They went in Jesus’ name.

What Jesus began to do in the flesh he continues to do in the Spirit through surrendered people. He continues to do the work for His own glory and the good of His own people. When miracles are going to be used in ministry the minister must recognize the purpose of the power that runs through him.

The Principle of Right Giving: Give God the Glory

The second principle says that miracles must always make much of God and give more force to the argument for following Jesus. When there is going to be a healing that actually helps the cause of evangelism the evangelist cannot get away from the goal of giving God all the glory. While the miracle may serve to give credibility to the minister and his ministry it must ultimately be used as a means for magnifying the Son of Man, as a platform for promoting Jesus, as a sign pointing toward the Savior, and a reinforcement of the requirement to repent and believe the gospel.

Peter gives the glory away when he says, “Jesus Christ heals you.” He uses the miracle of making a man well to make the Master well known. And the desired effect is achieved:

So all who dwelt at Lydda and Sharon saw him and turned to the Lord. (Acts 9:35)

The So of Acts 9:35 translates a conjunction that ties the action of healing in Jesus’ name (Acts 9:34) to the reaction of surrounding peoples (Acts 9:36-43) at the sight of the restored man. After eight years his muscles would have been atrophied and the neurological framework required to support an activity like making a bed would have to be retrained. But after Jesus heals Aeneas he is in a state like he was before becoming paralyzed. He was a wonder to behold. So great was the transformation that, with the enabling that comes from the Spirit, believing in Jesus was the unanimous response.

Some may ask if it is really necessary to give God the glory. This is a good question. I believe that He should only get the glory for His part in ministry. The opening of Acts makes it clear that Jesus continues to have a part:

The former account I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, until the day in which He was taken up, after He through the Holy Spirit had given commandments to the apostles whom He had chosen, (Acts 1:1-2)

Jesus began his ministry with His men and continued to do ministry through them. The apostle Paul has this to say concerning the ministry of Christ’s ministers:

I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me. (Galatians 2:20)

Questions for Community Discussion

  1. How does Peter ensure that the focus goes to Jesus when Aeneas is healed?
  2. When people comment on how your life has changed since you started following Christ what do you typically say? Are you prepared to share your testimony with others?

In the Aftermath of Chastening Part 1 (Acts 5:12-16)

In the Aftermath of Chastening (Acts 5:12-16)

12 And through the hands of the apostles many signs and wonders were done among the people. And they were all with one accord in Solomon’s Porch. 13 Yet none of the rest dared join them, but the people esteemed them highly. 14 And believers were increasingly added to the Lord, multitudes of both men and women, 15 so that they brought the sick out into the streets and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them. 16 Also a multitude gathered from the surrounding cities to Jerusalem, bringing sick people and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed.

Introduction

What does a congregation do after events like the church discipline displayed with Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11)? You could stop everything and get a consultant / counselor to come in and help everyone deal with the grief and fear that comes with (1) lying to the Spirit and (2) the Spirit’s abrupt removal of the liars. You could lose momentum and eventually have to shut things down. (In the denominations that I have served in such a response would involve contacting the district because the assets of the church actually belong to the denomination.) If you were in the Ananias camp you could convene a clandestine committee to replace Peter. (In light of most recent events, Peter is probably going to know. And may the Lord have mercy on you when you come to church.) Here is what the passage promotes:

1) Regard the church community and its individual members as sacred; do not bring into the bride of Christ worldly ways of getting ahead.

2) Acknowledge the anointing and authority of those appointed to lead. In the case of the apostles, their position and power in God’s work makes lying to them tantamount to lying to the Holy Spirit.

But what does a fellowship do after events like those recorded in Acts 5:1-11? In the writing of Luke we see that some things continue without change and one thing does not remain the same.

Questions for Consideration

  1. Do you interact with your local congregation as a sacred community or something common?
  2. While our local church leaders are not supernaturally able to discern the truth about things on their own, the Spirit can give them insights into things that would not otherwise be known. In your work with your leadership and other Christians are you mindful of the Spirit’s presence?

Missional Living — When the Kingdom Comes (A Couple Brings Corruption) Part 3 (Acts 4:32-5:11)

1 But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession. 2 And he kept back part of the proceeds, his wife also being aware of it, and brought a certain part and laid it at the apostles’ feet. 3 But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? 4 While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.” 5 Then Ananias, hearing these words, fell down and breathed his last. So great fear came upon all those who heard these things. 6 And the young men arose and wrapped him up, carried him out, and buried him. 7 Now it was about three hours later when his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. 8 And Peter answered her, “Tell me whether you sold the land for so much?” She said, “Yes, for so much.” 9 Then Peter said to her, “How is it that you have agreed together to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look, the feet of those who have buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out.” 10 Then immediately she fell down at his feet and breathed her last. And the young men came in and found her dead, and carrying her out, buried her by her husband. 11 So great fear came upon all the church and upon all who heard these things.

The But of Acts 5:1 antagonizes the message of Acts 4:32-35. Where Barnabas sold his land and brought the entire proceed to the church for its use, Ananias merely claimed to do this. His sin, with Sapphira his wife, was not in keeping back part of the price of the land. Peter makes it clear that he could have done that (Acts 5:4). There would have been no fault in giving only a portion of the sale to the church. In fact, Ananias could have kept the land in his own possession without there being a problem. His contribution was not compulsory (Acts 5:3-4).

Why did he do it? He and his wife wanted to be counted with the highly committed while still keeping a foot in the world. They wanted a positive nickname too. But, with a discernment that was given to him by the Holy Spirit, Peter explains why the plan would not work:

The Seriousness of Not Seeing the Anointing — Ananias failed to acknowledge the Anointing as he acted out his trespass. Even in the presence of continuous expressions of Heaven’s power (Acts 4:33) he made the mistake of regarding men after the flesh and the fellowship as being no more than what he could see. But the men leading the fellowship were anointed by God and able to do and see things above and beyond what is possible for mere mortals. The fellowship before Ananias and Sapphira is not only with the seen but also with the unseen Spirit of the Lord. The fellowship, treated as common and something to be manipulated, was in fact consecrated. That couple was tragically unholy in dealing with a people made holy by the Spirit of Holiness.

In light of all that Ananias had seen in the way of wonders it is amazing and confounding to Peter that he could have been so dull in thinking that his sin would not be seen. How did Ananias arrive at this point? The answer is that Satan had filled his heart to lie to the Holy Spirit (Acts 5:3). Satan had been at work trying to ruin the new creation. Just as in the garden, that serpent of old (Genesis 3:1,4; 2 Corinthians 11:3; Revelation 12:9; 20:2) had been working to (1) deceive people in paradise and (2) ruin relationships. After a while the arch nemesis of God was able to convince Ananias to lie to the Spirit. What could have been worse than bringing Satan’s corrupting influence entry into the new fellowship? Ananias had allowed Satan to furnish the rooms of his heart with worldly intentions.

Doors for Demonic Activity — When we fail to take our thoughts captive (2 Corinthians 10:4-5; Philippians 4:8) and and refuse to rigorously exclude ungodly desires that would take up residence in our hearts we (1) open doors for demonic activity and (2) create conditions conducive to crimes against God and His community (Ephesians 4:25-27; Romans 12:19; James 4:7).

Action Steps — Let us stop lying and speak truth (Zechariah 8:16; Ephesians 4:15, 25; Colossians 3:9).

    1. Stop Active Lying – Deceptive statements
    2. Stop Passive Lying – Omissions that mislead

Peter does not punish the man but explains the great foolishness of trying to deceive God; the sin, in this case, is judged by God Himself. Upon hearing these words Ananias dies (Acts 5:5). Sapphira colludes with her husband to mislead the church. But the plan will fail with tragic results. Asked if what she brought was the entire sale price of the land Sapphira, says that it was (Acts 5:8). As in so many Old Testament cases the opportunity to confess was given. Here are ten passages from the Old Testament where God asks a question aimed at prompting confession or self-reflection:

  • Genesis 3:9 – After Adam and Eve sinned, God asks Adam, “Where are you?”
  • Genesis 4:9 – God asks Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?”
  • Genesis 18:13 – “And the Lord said to Abraham, ‘Why did Sarah laugh, saying, ‘Shall I surely bear a child, since I am old?'”
  • Genesis 21:17 – God asks Hagar, “What ails you, Hagar?”
  • Genesis 32:27 – God asks Jacob, “What is your name?”
  • Job 38:4 – God asks Job, “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?”
  • 1 Samuel 15:14 – “But Samuel said, ‘What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?'”
  • Jonah 4:4 – “Then the Lord said, ‘Is it right for you to be angry?'”
  • Jeremiah 2:5 – God asks Israel, “What injustice have your fathers found in Me, that they have gone far from Me?”

These passages are instances where God’s questions are used to initiate introspection, catalyze confession, or to elicit a response that reveals deeper truths about the individuals involved. Sapphira did not make the most of her opportunity. If she had, mercy would have been shown:

He who covers his sins will not prosper, But whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy. (Proverbs 28:13)

Instead she took the opportunity to confirm her decision to test the Spirit of the Lord. What was the test?

The Test of Ananias and Saphira — Can we get away with lying about our giving in order to get a better status in our church community? Will God know?

She also dies and was carried away to be buried with her husband. Although this is bad, consider with me the consequences. Luke says that the result of this rebuke was that great fear came upon all the church and upon all who heard these things (Acts 5:11). The loss of earthly life has produced in the church a profound reverence for the presence of Christ and the position of the apostles. Christ in our midst at communion is serious; by treating it lightly we bring upon ourselves judgement. Christ at work through the leadership of the apostles is serious; by treating them as mere men the meaning of the miracles is missed and the Presence at work in them is disrespected.

Figure 1 – Signs and their Significance in the Opening of Acts

The immediate deaths of this deceptive couple were a sign indicating a spiritual reality – God does not want or tolerate lying in his church. Just as the signs of Pentecost and the fellowship prayer were not going to be repeated, the immediate deaths of liars in the church is not happening today. But the spiritual reality indicated in the narrative is that with God there is a deep displeasure associated with people in the church lying to one another and to Him. Former is unloving. The latter is dumb; He knows all. Today is the day to stop lying and start telling the truth. We should do this out of reverence for the Holy Spirit in our midst, out of caring for concern for the people that are our brother and sisters in the faith, and with the goal of protecting the quality of our witness. The whole idea of lying is from Satan the father of lies; it is what he had done from the beginning (Genesis 3:1-4). The notion should be arrested and rejected. When we fail to do that the suggestion eventually looks reasonable and becomes sin (Genesis 3:6).

Questions for Community Discussion

  1. In the verses of Acts 4:32-37 we are given a general description of the character of the new community. How does Luke give us an example of that character?
  2. Would you be willing to part ways with your stuff to ensure that the needs of other believers in our fellowship are met? What encouragement did they have (Acts 4:33)?
  3. What explains their ability to show this level of generosity (Ephesians 4:17-21; Romans 5:5; 1 John 5:1)?
  4. What was the difference between the gift of Barnabas and the gift of Ananias (Acts 4:36-37; 5:1-4)?
  5. Is your giving about gratitude toward God and worship or is it about garnering praise, creating a perception of piety, and generating an image of generosity.
  6. Does it matter if your presentation of an offering does not line up with the truth (John 4:24)?
  7. Do you think that Ananias was saved? Consider the words of 1 Corinthians 5:5 as you formulate an answer.